Skip to content

Side-by-side comparison · Presentations & Docs

Gamma vs GPT for Work vs Quadratic

Everything that matters when choosing between them, in one place: our rating, what each can do, what they cost, and the trade-offs.

Best overall

Gamma

4.5

Free to start

GPT for Work

4.2

From $25/mo

Quadratic

4.0

From $18/user/mo

Comparing 3 tools, the maximum.

At a glance

Best overallEasiest to use

Pick it if: Anyone who dreads building slides and would rather start from a finished draft than a blank template.

Pick it if: Marketers, ecommerce teams and operations staff who do the same text job across hundreds of spreadsheet rows.

Pick it if: Analysts, finance staff and founders who outgrow Excel and want AI to write the analysis in a sheet they can check.

Overview

AttributeGammaGPT for WorkQuadratic
In one linePaste an outline and get a well-designed deck, doc or web page in minutes.AI functions and bulk AI jobs inside Google Sheets and Excel, plus Docs and Word.A spreadsheet where AI writes the formulas, Python and SQL to analyse your data.
Pricing modelFreemiumPaidFreemium
Starting priceFree$25/mo$18/user/mo
Free plan Yes No Yes
Works with Claude Code Yes Yes Yes

Rating breakdown

Our scores out of 5. The higher bar in each row is highlighted.

AttributeGammaGPT for WorkQuadratic
Overall rating4.5Winner4.24.0
Ease of useHow quickly someone non-technical gets value from it.
5.0
4.0
3.5
FeaturesHow completely it covers its own job, and how well the pieces fit together.
4.5
4.5
4.5
Output qualityHow good the results are before you fix them.
4.5
4.0
4.0
Value for moneyWhat you get for the price, including the free plan.
4.0
4.0
4.0
Speed & reliabilityHow fast it is and how often it falls over.
4.5
4.5
4.0

Feature comparison

A tick means it does this today. A dash means we haven't checked.

AttributeGammaGPT for WorkQuadratic
Access & platform
Free plan Yes No Yes
Mobile app Yes– No
Desktop app No– No
Browser extension No––
API access Yes Yes Yes
Teams & business
Team workspace Yes Yes Yes
Enterprise plan or SSO Yes Yes Yes
Connects to other apps Yes Yes Yes
Open source or self-hosted No No Yes
AI abilities
Works with your files Yes Yes Yes
Understands images–––
Makes images Yes No No
Makes video No No No
Writes code No– Yes
Runs agents or automations Yes Yes Yes
Learns your brand or style Yes––
Works in many languages Yes Yes–
Capabilities score11/ 177/ 179/ 17

Pricing

Plans as listed on each vendor's site when we last checked. Confirm before you buy.

AttributeGammaGPT for WorkQuadratic
Plans

Free

Free

Testing whether the output suits you.

StandardOur pick

$25/mo

One person running bulk jobs.

Personal

Free

Trying it out or light personal analysis.

PlusOur pick

See website

Individuals who make a few decks a month.

Business

$45/seat/mo

Teams sharing a budget.

ProOur pick

$18/user/mo billed yearly

Individuals and small teams doing regular analysis.

Pro

See website

People who present weekly or want analytics and the API.

Enterprise

Custom

Large organisations.

Business

$36/user/mo billed yearly

Teams that lean on the AI every day.

Ultra

See website

Heavy users running Gamma all day.

Enterprise

Custom

Larger companies with security and hosting rules.

Business

See website

Companies that need admin controls and single sign-on.

Which plan to pickUse the free credits to make two or three decks and judge the output. If you'll keep using it, Plus is the sensible step because it removes the badge and refreshes credits monthly. Only move to Pro if you want the API, custom domains or viewer analytics.Standard covers most individuals; watch the usage dashboard on your first big job. Move to Business when several people need it or you want to run it on your own AI account.Start on the free Personal plan with a real data set. If you use it every week, Pro is enough for most people; move to Business only if you keep running out of AI credits. Monthly billing costs about 10% more than the yearly prices shown.

Key features

AttributeGammaGPT for WorkQuadratic
Standout features
  • Generate from anything
  • Cards, not slides
  • Gamma Agent
  • Themes and brand kit
  • Export anywhere
  • API and connectors
  • AI formulas
  • Bulk tools
  • Spreadsheet agent
  • Choice of models
  • Autosheet MCP
  • AI analyst
  • Code in any cell
  • Database and app connections
  • Large files
  • PDF extraction
  • MCP and API

Pros and cons

AttributeGammaGPT for WorkQuadratic
Pros
  • Fastest route from notes to a presentable deck
  • Designs look polished without any design skill
  • One file works as a deck, document or web page
  • The agent makes rewrites and restyles painless
  • API and connectors mean it fits into automated workflows
  • Fast bulk processing on very large sheets
  • Choice of AI models, including Claude
  • Works where your data already is
  • Clear usage reporting and spending limits
  • Well rated, long-running company
  • Every AI answer stays as formulas or code you can check and edit
  • Python, SQL, JavaScript and formulas in one grid
  • Direct database connections, no exporting CSVs
  • Handles much larger data sets than Excel or Google Sheets
  • Useful free plan and fair entry price
  • MCP server and API, so Claude can work with your sheets
Cons
  • Free credits are a one-off, so the free plan runs out
  • Hard to keep strictly on brand across many decks
  • Credits drain quickly if you regenerate images often
  • Exports to PowerPoint don't always keep the layout intact
  • Token-based billing makes big jobs on top models hard to predict
  • No ongoing free plan
  • Results across thousands of rows need spot-checking
  • Each plan covers either the Sheets or the Excel add-on, not both
  • Much more useful if you can read some Python or SQL
  • Overkill if you only need help with the odd formula
  • AI credits run out quickly for heavy users
  • Small community, so fewer templates and tutorials than Excel or Sheets
  • Few independent reviews yet, as it is a newer product

Who each one is for

AttributeGammaGPT for WorkQuadratic
Best for
  • Pitch decks from notes
  • Internal updates and proposals
  • Turning a document into slides
  • Simple one-page websites
  • Bulk AI jobs across spreadsheet rows
  • Categorising and tagging data
  • Product descriptions and translations
  • Teams that want to choose their AI model
  • Asking questions of large data sets in plain English
  • Pulling live data from a company database
  • Python and SQL analysis without a separate notebook
  • Extracting tables from PDFs into a sheet
  • Auditable reports and models
You'll find it used by
  • Founders
  • Marketers
  • Consultants
  • Sales teams
  • Educators
  • Marketers
  • Ecommerce teams
  • Operations staff
  • Sales ops
  • Consultants
  • Data analysts
  • Finance teams
  • Founders
  • Operations managers
  • Researchers

Questions people ask

Which is better, Gamma, GPT for Work or Quadratic?

Gamma scores highest overall in our ratings (Gamma 4.5/5, GPT for Work 4.2/5 and Quadratic 4.0/5). Gamma is best for pitch decks from notes and internal updates and proposals. GPT for Work is best for Bulk AI jobs across spreadsheet rows and categorising and tagging data. Quadratic is best for asking questions of large data sets in plain English and pulling live data from a company database.

Which is cheaper, Gamma, GPT for Work or Quadratic?

Gamma: It's free to use. GPT for Work: There's no free plan. Paid plans start at $25/mo. Quadratic: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at $18/user/mo.

Which is easier to use, Gamma, GPT for Work or Quadratic?

Gamma rates highest for ease of use in our scores. Anyone who dreads building slides and would rather start from a finished draft than a blank template.

How we compare

Ratings are our own, from using each tool, across ease of use, features, output quality, value for money, speed & reliability.

Swap in another tool

More tools from Presentations & Docs in the library.