Skip to content

Side-by-side comparison · Presentations & Docs

Claude Docs & Slides vs Gamma vs GPT for Work

Everything that matters when choosing between them, in one place: our rating, what each can do, what they cost, and the trade-offs.

Claude Docs & Slides

4.0

From $20/mo

Best overall

Gamma

4.5

Free to start

GPT for Work

4.2

From $25/mo

Comparing 3 tools, the maximum.

At a glance

Best value

Pick it if: Anyone who already uses Claude and wants the report or deck at the end of the chat, ready to share.

Best overallEasiest to use

Pick it if: Anyone who dreads building slides and would rather start from a finished draft than a blank template.

Pick it if: Marketers, ecommerce teams and operations staff who do the same text job across hundreds of spreadsheet rows.

Gamma scores highest overall, but Claude Docs & Slides gives you more for your money. Which one is right comes down to what you value most.

Overview

AttributeClaude Docs & SlidesGammaGPT for Work
In one lineAsk Claude for a document or deck, then edit, share and export it without leaving chat.Paste an outline and get a well-designed deck, doc or web page in minutes.AI functions and bulk AI jobs inside Google Sheets and Excel, plus Docs and Word.
Pricing modelFreemiumFreemiumPaid
Starting price$20/moFree$25/mo
Free plan Yes Yes No
Works with Claude Code Yes Yes Yes

Rating breakdown

Our scores out of 5. The higher bar in each row is highlighted.

AttributeClaude Docs & SlidesGammaGPT for Work
Overall rating4.04.5Winner4.2
Ease of useHow quickly someone non-technical gets value from it.
4.5
5.0
4.0
FeaturesHow completely it covers its own job, and how well the pieces fit together.
3.5
4.5
4.5
Output qualityHow good the results are before you fix them.
4.0
4.5
4.0
Value for moneyWhat you get for the price, including the free plan.
4.5
4.0
4.0
Speed & reliabilityHow fast it is and how often it falls over.
3.5
4.5
4.5

Feature comparison

A tick means it does this today. A dash means we haven't checked.

AttributeClaude Docs & SlidesGammaGPT for Work
Access & platform
Free plan Yes Yes No
Mobile app Yes Yes–
Desktop app Yes No–
Browser extension No No–
API access– Yes Yes
Teams & business
Team workspace Yes Yes Yes
Enterprise plan or SSO Yes Yes Yes
Connects to other apps Yes Yes Yes
Open source or self-hosted No No No
AI abilities
Works with your files Yes Yes Yes
Understands images Yes––
Makes images No Yes No
Makes video No No No
Writes code Yes No–
Runs agents or automations Yes Yes Yes
Learns your brand or style Yes Yes–
Works in many languages Yes Yes Yes
Capabilities score12/ 1711/ 177/ 17

Pricing

Plans as listed on each vendor's site when we last checked. Confirm before you buy.

AttributeClaude Docs & SlidesGammaGPT for Work
Plans

Free

Free

Trying a document or deck.

Free

Free

Testing whether the output suits you.

StandardOur pick

$25/mo

One person running bulk jobs.

ProOur pick

$20/mo, or $17/mo billed yearly

Anyone making documents or decks most weeks.

PlusOur pick

See website

Individuals who make a few decks a month.

Business

$45/seat/mo

Teams sharing a budget.

Max

From $100/mo

Heavy users who hit Pro limits.

Pro

See website

People who present weekly or want analytics and the API.

Enterprise

Custom

Large organisations.

Team

$25/seat/mo, or $20/seat/mo billed yearly

Businesses sharing documents across a team.

Ultra

See website

Heavy users running Gamma all day.

Enterprise

From $20/seat/mo billed yearly, plus usage

Larger organisations needing admin control.

Business

See website

Companies that need admin controls and single sign-on.

Which plan to pickIf you already pay for Claude, you have it. Try it on Free first, and move to Pro once you're making more than the odd document, because decks use up a Free allowance fast. Team makes sense when colleagues need to open and comment on the same documents.Use the free credits to make two or three decks and judge the output. If you'll keep using it, Plus is the sensible step because it removes the badge and refreshes credits monthly. Only move to Pro if you want the API, custom domains or viewer analytics.Standard covers most individuals; watch the usage dashboard on your first big job. Move to Business when several people need it or you want to run it on your own AI account.

Key features

AttributeClaude Docs & SlidesGammaGPT for Work
Standout features
  • Made in the chat
  • Built from your sources
  • Share and comment
  • Tables, charts and diagrams
  • Present or export
  • Scheduled reports
  • Generate from anything
  • Cards, not slides
  • Gamma Agent
  • Themes and brand kit
  • Export anywhere
  • API and connectors
  • AI formulas
  • Bulk tools
  • Spreadsheet agent
  • Choice of models
  • Autosheet MCP

Pros and cons

AttributeClaude Docs & SlidesGammaGPT for Work
Pros
  • No extra subscription if you already use Claude, and Free can try it
  • The document or deck comes out of the same chat that did the research
  • Edit directly or by asking, without copying text into another app
  • Exports to the formats clients and colleagues already use
  • Report and deck stay consistent because they come from one conversation
  • Fastest route from notes to a presentable deck
  • Designs look polished without any design skill
  • One file works as a deck, document or web page
  • The agent makes rewrites and restyles painless
  • API and connectors mean it fits into automated workflows
  • Fast bulk processing on very large sheets
  • Choice of AI models, including Claude
  • Works where your data already is
  • Clear usage reporting and spending limits
  • Well rated, long-running company
Cons
  • No brand templates in Slides, so decks look generic next to Claude Design or Gamma
  • Rewriting a long doc eats your Claude usage limits quickly, especially on Free and Pro
  • Rough edges on complex formatting, and co-editing and version history are lighter than Google Docs
  • Decks are starting to look recognisably "made by Claude" to clients
  • Sometimes makes a Claude Doc when you wanted a plain Word file, and docs don't flow back into Project knowledge
  • Free credits are a one-off, so the free plan runs out
  • Hard to keep strictly on brand across many decks
  • Credits drain quickly if you regenerate images often
  • Exports to PowerPoint don't always keep the layout intact
  • Token-based billing makes big jobs on top models hard to predict
  • No ongoing free plan
  • Results across thousands of rows need spot-checking
  • Each plan covers either the Sheets or the Excel add-on, not both

Who each one is for

AttributeClaude Docs & SlidesGammaGPT for Work
Best for
  • Reports and proposals from research
  • Quick internal decks
  • Weekly reports on a schedule
  • SOPs and how-to guides
  • Turning a document into slides
  • Pitch decks from notes
  • Internal updates and proposals
  • Turning a document into slides
  • Simple one-page websites
  • Bulk AI jobs across spreadsheet rows
  • Categorising and tagging data
  • Product descriptions and translations
  • Teams that want to choose their AI model
You'll find it used by
  • Founders
  • Consultants
  • Operations managers
  • Marketers
  • Founders
  • Marketers
  • Consultants
  • Sales teams
  • Educators
  • Marketers
  • Ecommerce teams
  • Operations staff
  • Sales ops
  • Consultants

Questions people ask

Which is better, Claude Docs & Slides, Gamma or GPT for Work?

Gamma scores highest overall in our ratings (Claude Docs & Slides 4.0/5, Gamma 4.5/5 and GPT for Work 4.2/5). Claude Docs & Slides is best for reports and proposals from research and quick internal decks. Gamma is best for pitch decks from notes and internal updates and proposals. GPT for Work is best for Bulk AI jobs across spreadsheet rows and categorising and tagging data.

Which is cheaper, Claude Docs & Slides, Gamma or GPT for Work?

Claude Docs & Slides: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at $20/mo. Gamma: It's free to use. GPT for Work: There's no free plan. Paid plans start at $25/mo.

Which is easier to use, Claude Docs & Slides, Gamma or GPT for Work?

Gamma rates highest for ease of use in our scores. Anyone who dreads building slides and would rather start from a finished draft than a blank template.

How we compare

Ratings are our own, from using each tool, across ease of use, features, output quality, value for money, speed & reliability.

Swap in another tool

More tools from Presentations & Docs in the library.