Skip to content

Side-by-side comparison · Presentations & Docs

Gamma vs GPT for Work vs Pitch

Everything that matters when choosing between them, in one place: our rating, what each can do, what they cost, and the trade-offs.

Best overall

Gamma

4.5

Free to start

GPT for Work

4.2

From $25/mo

Pitch

4.0

From €10/mo

Comparing 3 tools, the maximum.

At a glance

Best overallEasiest to use

Pick it if: Anyone who dreads building slides and would rather start from a finished draft than a blank template.

Pick it if: Marketers, ecommerce teams and operations staff who do the same text job across hundreds of spreadsheet rows.

Pick it if: Startups and sales teams who build decks together and want to know what happens after they send them.

Overview

AttributeGammaGPT for WorkPitch
In one linePaste an outline and get a well-designed deck, doc or web page in minutes.AI functions and bulk AI jobs inside Google Sheets and Excel, plus Docs and Word.Collaborative deck builder for teams, with AI drafts, shared templates and view tracking.
Pricing modelFreemiumPaidFreemium
Starting priceFree$25/mo€10/mo
Free plan Yes No Yes
Works with Claude Code Yes Yes No

Rating breakdown

Our scores out of 5. The higher bar in each row is highlighted.

AttributeGammaGPT for WorkPitch
Overall rating4.5Winner4.24.0
Ease of useHow quickly someone non-technical gets value from it.
5.0
4.0
4.0
FeaturesHow completely it covers its own job, and how well the pieces fit together.
4.5
4.5
4.0
Output qualityHow good the results are before you fix them.
4.5
4.0
4.0
Value for moneyWhat you get for the price, including the free plan.
4.0
4.0
4.0
Speed & reliabilityHow fast it is and how often it falls over.
4.5
4.5
4.0

Feature comparison

A tick means it does this today. A dash means we haven't checked.

AttributeGammaGPT for WorkPitch
Access & platform
Free plan Yes No Yes
Mobile app Yes– Yes
Desktop app No– Yes
Browser extension No– No
API access Yes Yes No
Teams & business
Team workspace Yes Yes Yes
Enterprise plan or SSO Yes Yes Yes
Connects to other apps Yes Yes Yes
Open source or self-hosted No No No
AI abilities
Works with your files Yes Yes Yes
Understands images–––
Makes images Yes No Yes
Makes video No No No
Writes code No– No
Runs agents or automations Yes Yes No
Learns your brand or style Yes– Yes
Works in many languages Yes Yes Yes
Capabilities score11/ 177/ 1710/ 17

Pricing

Plans as listed on each vendor's site when we last checked. Confirm before you buy.

AttributeGammaGPT for WorkPitch
Plans

Free

Free

Testing whether the output suits you.

StandardOur pick

$25/mo

One person running bulk jobs.

Free

Free

Individuals and teams of up to five trying it out.

PlusOur pick

See website

Individuals who make a few decks a month.

Business

$45/seat/mo

Teams sharing a budget.

PlusOur pick

€10/mo billed yearly

One person who sends decks to clients.

Pro

See website

People who present weekly or want analytics and the API.

Enterprise

Custom

Large organisations.

Team

€15/seat/mo billed yearly

Small teams building decks together.

Ultra

See website

Heavy users running Gamma all day.

Business

€20/seat/mo billed yearly

Larger teams sending lots of decks.

Business

See website

Companies that need admin controls and single sign-on.

Enterprise

Custom

Companies of 30 or more seats with security needs.

Which plan to pickUse the free credits to make two or three decks and judge the output. If you'll keep using it, Plus is the sensible step because it removes the badge and refreshes credits monthly. Only move to Pro if you want the API, custom domains or viewer analytics.Standard covers most individuals; watch the usage dashboard on your first big job. Move to Business when several people need it or you want to run it on your own AI account.Start on Free, which is enough to decide if the editor suits you. A solo consultant should move to Plus for clean PowerPoint exports. A sales team of three or more should go straight to Team for the shared credits and viewer tracking.

Key features

AttributeGammaGPT for WorkPitch
Standout features
  • Generate from anything
  • Cards, not slides
  • Gamma Agent
  • Themes and brand kit
  • Export anywhere
  • API and connectors
  • AI formulas
  • Bulk tools
  • Spreadsheet agent
  • Choice of models
  • Autosheet MCP
  • Live collaboration
  • AI first drafts
  • Custom templates
  • Pitch rooms and advanced links
  • Exports
  • Desktop and mobile apps

Pros and cons

AttributeGammaGPT for WorkPitch
Pros
  • Fastest route from notes to a presentable deck
  • Designs look polished without any design skill
  • One file works as a deck, document or web page
  • The agent makes rewrites and restyles painless
  • API and connectors mean it fits into automated workflows
  • Fast bulk processing on very large sheets
  • Choice of AI models, including Claude
  • Works where your data already is
  • Clear usage reporting and spending limits
  • Well rated, long-running company
  • Best collaboration features in the category
  • Templates and brand controls that non-designers can follow
  • Viewer analytics tell you what happens after you hit send
  • Free plan is enough for small teams to work in
  • Desktop apps and a clean, fast editor
Cons
  • Free credits are a one-off, so the free plan runs out
  • Hard to keep strictly on brand across many decks
  • Credits drain quickly if you regenerate images often
  • Exports to PowerPoint don't always keep the layout intact
  • Token-based billing makes big jobs on top models hard to predict
  • No ongoing free plan
  • Results across thousands of rows need spot-checking
  • Each plan covers either the Sheets or the Excel add-on, not both
  • AI credits are modest and the free batch never renews
  • Free plan exports carry Pitch branding and skip PowerPoint
  • Pricing is in euros, so your bill moves with the exchange rate
  • Fewer AI design flourishes than Gamma, so drafts need more hands-on work

Who each one is for

AttributeGammaGPT for WorkPitch
Best for
  • Pitch decks from notes
  • Internal updates and proposals
  • Turning a document into slides
  • Simple one-page websites
  • Bulk AI jobs across spreadsheet rows
  • Categorising and tagging data
  • Product descriptions and translations
  • Teams that want to choose their AI model
  • Fundraising and sales decks
  • Collaborative editing
  • Tracking who viewed a deck
  • Branded team templates
You'll find it used by
  • Founders
  • Marketers
  • Consultants
  • Sales teams
  • Educators
  • Marketers
  • Ecommerce teams
  • Operations staff
  • Sales ops
  • Consultants
  • Startups
  • Sales teams
  • Agencies
  • Marketers

Questions people ask

Which is better, Gamma, GPT for Work or Pitch?

Gamma scores highest overall in our ratings (Gamma 4.5/5, GPT for Work 4.2/5 and Pitch 4.0/5). Gamma is best for pitch decks from notes and internal updates and proposals. GPT for Work is best for Bulk AI jobs across spreadsheet rows and categorising and tagging data. Pitch is best for fundraising and sales decks and collaborative editing.

Which is cheaper, Gamma, GPT for Work or Pitch?

Gamma: It's free to use. GPT for Work: There's no free plan. Paid plans start at $25/mo. Pitch: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at €10/mo.

Which is easier to use, Gamma, GPT for Work or Pitch?

Gamma rates highest for ease of use in our scores. Anyone who dreads building slides and would rather start from a finished draft than a blank template.

How we compare

Ratings are our own, from using each tool, across ease of use, features, output quality, value for money, speed & reliability.

Swap in another tool

More tools from Presentations & Docs in the library.