Side-by-side comparison · Presentations & Docs
Gamma vs GPT for Work vs Presentations.AI
Everything that matters when choosing between them, in one place: our rating, what each can do, what they cost, and the trade-offs.
Comparing 3 tools, the maximum.
At a glance
Pick it if: Anyone who dreads building slides and would rather start from a finished draft than a blank template.
Pick it if: Marketers, ecommerce teams and operations staff who do the same text job across hundreds of spreadsheet rows.
Pick it if: Sales teams, founders and marketers who make business decks often and want them on brand without a designer.
Overview
| Attribute | Gamma | GPT for Work | Presentations.AI |
|---|---|---|---|
| In one line | Paste an outline and get a well-designed deck, doc or web page in minutes. | AI functions and bulk AI jobs inside Google Sheets and Excel, plus Docs and Word. | Makes on-brand slide decks from a prompt or document, and tracks who views them. |
| Pricing model | Freemium | Paid | Freemium |
| Starting price | Free | $25/mo | $0 |
| Free plan | Yes | No | Yes |
| Works with Claude Code | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Rating breakdown
Our scores out of 5. The higher bar in each row is highlighted.
| Attribute | Gamma | GPT for Work | Presentations.AI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.5Winner | 4.2 | 3.6 |
| Ease of useHow quickly someone non-technical gets value from it. | 5.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| FeaturesHow completely it covers its own job, and how well the pieces fit together. | 4.5 | 4.5 | 3.5 |
| Output qualityHow good the results are before you fix them. | 4.5 | 4.0 | 3.5 |
| Value for moneyWhat you get for the price, including the free plan. | 4.0 | 4.0 | 3.0 |
| Speed & reliabilityHow fast it is and how often it falls over. | 4.5 | 4.5 | 4.0 |
Feature comparison
A tick means it does this today. A dash means we haven't checked.
| Attribute | Gamma | GPT for Work | Presentations.AI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Access & platform | |||
| Free plan | Yes | No | Yes |
| Mobile app | Yes | – | No |
| Desktop app | No | – | No |
| Browser extension | No | – | Yes |
| API access | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Teams & business | |||
| Team workspace | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Enterprise plan or SSO | Yes | Yes | – |
| Connects to other apps | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Open source or self-hosted | No | No | No |
| AI abilities | |||
| Works with your files | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Understands images | – | – | – |
| Makes images | Yes | No | Yes |
| Makes video | No | No | No |
| Writes code | No | – | No |
| Runs agents or automations | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Learns your brand or style | Yes | – | Yes |
| Works in many languages | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Capabilities score | 11/ 17 | 7/ 17 | 10/ 17 |
Pricing
Plans as listed on each vendor's site when we last checked. Confirm before you buy.
| Attribute | Gamma | GPT for Work | Presentations.AI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Plans | Free Free Testing whether the output suits you. | StandardOur pick $25/mo One person running bulk jobs. | Starter $0 Trying a deck or two. |
PlusOur pick See website Individuals who make a few decks a month. | Business $45/seat/mo Teams sharing a budget. | ProOur pick $20/mo billed yearly ($240) People who present regularly. | |
Pro See website People who present weekly or want analytics and the API. | Enterprise Custom Large organisations. | Gold $100/mo billed yearly ($1,200) Teams where decks win or lose deals. | |
Ultra See website Heavy users running Gamma all day. | |||
Business See website Companies that need admin controls and single sign-on. | |||
| Which plan to pick | Use the free credits to make two or three decks and judge the output. If you'll keep using it, Plus is the sensible step because it removes the badge and refreshes credits monthly. Only move to Pro if you want the API, custom domains or viewer analytics. | Standard covers most individuals; watch the usage dashboard on your first big job. Move to Business when several people need it or you want to run it on your own AI account. | Make one real deck on Starter. If it beats your current process, Pro covers most people. Gold only makes sense for teams that need custom templates and a shared knowledge base. Compare it with Gamma before paying for a year. |
Key features
| Attribute | Gamma | GPT for Work | Presentations.AI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standout features |
|
|
|
Pros and cons
| Attribute | Gamma | GPT for Work | Presentations.AI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pros |
|
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
|
Who each one is for
| Attribute | Gamma | GPT for Work | Presentations.AI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best for |
|
|
|
| You'll find it used by |
|
|
|
Questions people ask
Which is better, Gamma, GPT for Work or Presentations.AI?
Gamma scores highest overall in our ratings (Gamma 4.5/5, GPT for Work 4.2/5 and Presentations.AI 3.6/5). Gamma is best for pitch decks from notes and internal updates and proposals. GPT for Work is best for Bulk AI jobs across spreadsheet rows and categorising and tagging data. Presentations.AI is best for sales and pitch decks and turning a document into slides.
Which is cheaper, Gamma, GPT for Work or Presentations.AI?
Gamma: It's free to use. GPT for Work: There's no free plan. Paid plans start at $25/mo. Presentations.AI: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at $0.
Which is easier to use, Gamma, GPT for Work or Presentations.AI?
Gamma rates highest for ease of use in our scores. Anyone who dreads building slides and would rather start from a finished draft than a blank template.
How we compare
Ratings are our own, from using each tool, across ease of use, features, output quality, value for money, speed & reliability.
Swap in another tool
More tools from Presentations & Docs in the library.
