Qodo

Qodo (formerly CodiumAI) reviews code. When someone opens a pull request on GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket or Azure DevOps, several AI agents read the change against the rest of your codebase and your team's written rules, then leave comments on bugs, missing tests, security problems and rule breaks. Developers can run the same review in VS Code, JetBrains or Visual Studio before they push, and a CLI lets coding agents like Claude Code check their own work.

Pick it when your team is shipping more AI-written code than people can carefully review, and you want consistent standards enforced across many repositories. CodeRabbit, already in the library, is the main alternative: it has a free plan and is easier to start with, while Qodo leans harder into custom rules, cross-repository context and enterprise hosting options. Qodo started out known for writing unit tests, but its current product is centred on review.

The catch: there is no free plan any more, only a 14-day trial, and the team plan is sold as pooled credits where bigger pull requests cost more, so you have to watch usage. Like every AI reviewer, it raises some comments that aren't worth acting on, and it takes tuning of your rules to cut the noise.

• Software teams
• Engineering managers
• Tech leads
• Enterprise development teams

Software teams who want every pull request checked for bugs and against their coding standards before a person reviews it.

• Multi-agent pull request review

  Several agents check each change for bugs, security issues, missing tests and rule breaks, and comment inline.

• Rules and skills

  Write your team's standards once and have every review check against them, across all repositories.

• Codebase context

  Reviews look at related code in other files and repositories, not just the lines that changed.

• Review in the IDE

  Run the same review in VS Code, JetBrains or Visual Studio before you open a pull request.

• CLI for coding agents

  Lets agents like Claude Code run Qodo's checks on the code they've just written.

• Free trial

  Free for 14 days

  Testing it on your own repositories.

  • Full reviews during the trial
  • No credit card needed
• Our pick

  Pro Team

  From $30/mo in pooled credits

  Teams of up to 30 developers.

  • Pull request reviews, priced by credits shared across the team
  • Unlimited rules, Git and IDE integrations
  • Dashboard and analytics
  • You set the cap on extra spend

• Enterprise

  Custom

  Larger organisations with security requirements.

  • SSO, audit logs and bring-your-own-key
  • Single-tenant or on-premise hosting
  • Self-learning rules and Gerrit support
  • Priority support and a success manager

Prices in USD unless noted, checked 22 October 2026. Vendors change plans often, so confirm on their site before you buy.

Ways Qodo can slot into your week.

1. 1

   First-pass review

   Let Qodo comment on every pull request so senior developers only look at what matters.

2. 2

   Guardrails for AI-written code

   Check code from Copilot, Cursor or Claude Code against your rules before it reaches main.

3. 3

   Consistent standards

   Write naming, security and testing rules once and have them enforced in every repository.

It plugs into the Git platform and IDEs you already use and sits after your coding assistant: the assistant writes, Qodo reviews, a person approves.

The closest alternatives to Qodo in the library, best rated first.

• 

  Claude Code

  4.4

  Best for building features end to end

  Compare with Qodo
• 

  Zed

  4.3

  Best for Running Claude Code inside an editor

  Compare with Qodo
• 

  OpenAI Codex

  4.2

  Best for background tasks in the cloud

  Compare with Qodo
• 

  Warp

  4.1

  Best for A nicer home for Claude Code

  Compare with Qodo