Skip to content

Side-by-side comparison · Coding & Dev Tools

Cursor vs Qodo vs Zed

Everything that matters when choosing between them, in one place: our rating, what each can do, what they cost, and the trade-offs.

Cursor

3.9

From $8/mo

Qodo

3.7

From From $30/mo in pooled credits

Best overall

Zed

4.3

From $10/mo

Comparing 3 tools, the maximum.

At a glance

Pick it if: Developers and curious beginners who want AI help but still want a visual editor.

Qodo3.7

Pick it if: Software teams who want every pull request checked for bugs and against their coding standards before a person reviews it.

Zed4.3
Best overallBest value

Pick it if: Developers who want a fast editor and already pay for Claude or another AI provider.

Overview

AttributeCursorQodoZed
In one lineA code editor with AI built in, for people who want to watch every change happen.AI code review that checks every pull request against your team's rules before merge.A fast, free, open-source code editor that runs Claude Code and other AI agents inside it.
Pricing modelFreemiumPaidOpen source
Starting price$8/moFrom $30/mo in pooled credits$10/mo
Free plan Yes No Yes
Works with Claude Code No Yes Yes

Rating breakdown

Our scores out of 5. The higher bar in each row is highlighted.

AttributeCursorQodoZed
Overall rating3.93.74.3Winner
Ease of useHow quickly someone non-technical gets value from it.
4.0
4.0
3.5
FeaturesHow completely it covers its own job, and how well the pieces fit together.
4.5
4.0
4.0
Output qualityHow good the results are before you fix them.
4.0
3.5
4.0
Value for moneyWhat you get for the price, including the free plan.
3.0
3.0
5.0
Speed & reliabilityHow fast it is and how often it falls over.
4.0
4.0
5.0

Feature comparison

A tick means it does this today. A dash means we haven't checked.

AttributeCursorQodoZed
Access & platform
Free plan Yes No Yes
Mobile app Yes– No
Desktop app Yes– Yes
Browser extension No– No
API access–––
Teams & business
Team workspace Yes Yes Yes
Enterprise plan or SSO Yes Yes No
Connects to other apps Yes Yes Yes
Open source or self-hosted No Yes Yes
AI abilities
Works with your files Yes– Yes
Understands images Yes– Yes
Makes images No No No
Makes video No No No
Writes code Yes Yes Yes
Runs agents or automations Yes Yes Yes
Learns your brand or style Yes– Yes
Works in many languages Yes– Yes
Capabilities score12/ 176/ 1711/ 17

Pricing

Plans as listed on each vendor's site when we last checked. Confirm before you buy.

AttributeCursorQodoZed
Plans

Free

Free

Trying the editor and a few agent runs.

Free trial

Free for 14 days

Testing it on your own repositories.

PersonalOur pick

Free

Almost everyone.

Plus

$8/mo

Light users who are happy with Grok models only.

Pro TeamOur pick

From $30/mo in pooled credits

Teams of up to 30 developers.

Pro

$10/mo

People who want Zed's hosted AI without managing keys.

PremiumOur pick

$30/mo

Most developers, especially if you want Claude alongside Grok.

Enterprise

Custom

Larger organisations with security requirements.

Business

$30/seat/mo

Teams that need spending and access controls.

Super or Ultra

$100/mo or $200/mo

Heavy daily agent users.

Legacy Pro

$20/mo

Existing subscribers only. New customers can't buy it.

Teams

From $30/user/mo

Companies that need admin controls and SSO.

Which plan to pickIf you are on the old $20 Pro plan and it covers what you use, stay put; switching is permanent. New customers should skip Plus unless they are happy with Grok. Premium is the realistic starting point if you want Claude, and budget for the extra usage billing on top of the $30. Large companies can ask about a custom Enterprise plan.Run the 14-day trial on a busy repository and see how many credits a normal week uses before you pick a credit pack. Talk to sales only if you need SSO or on-premise hosting.Personal. If you have Claude Pro, run Claude Code inside Zed and you are done. Pro only makes sense if you want Zed's built-in assistant and edit predictions without setting up API keys.

Key features

AttributeCursorQodoZed
Standout features
  • Tab autocomplete
  • Agent mode
  • Chat with your codebase
  • Cloud agents and automations
  • Rules
  • Built on VS Code
  • Multi-agent pull request review
  • Rules and skills
  • Codebase context
  • Review in the IDE
  • CLI for coding agents
  • Built for speed
  • External agents inside the editor
  • Bring your own keys
  • Edit predictions
  • Real-time collaboration
  • Open source

Pros and cons

AttributeCursorQodoZed
Pros
  • The clearest view of what an AI is doing to your code
  • Autocomplete is still the best in the category
  • Feels familiar instantly if you have used VS Code
  • Cloud agents and code review on the mid plans
  • Reviews use context from the wider codebase, not just the diff
  • Custom rules applied across every repository
  • Supports all the major Git platforms
  • Enterprise hosting options, including on-premise
  • Noticeably faster than VS Code and Cursor
  • Free, open source, and no charge for running your own agents
  • Clean agent panel that shows exactly what changed
  • Built-in real-time collaboration
Cons
  • Cheap plans only give you Grok models
  • Claude usage is billed on top of the subscription at API prices, so the real cost is hard to predict
  • OpenAI models are due to leave Cursor, which narrows the model choice
  • You now buy it bundled with Grok and X Premium, whether you want them or not
  • Agent runs are less thorough than Claude Code on big tasks
  • No free plan any more, only a 14-day trial
  • Credit-based pricing makes cost per review uneven and harder to budget
  • Some comments are noise until you tune your rules
  • Product and plan names have changed several times, which makes older reviews confusing
  • Smaller extension library than VS Code or Cursor
  • Less hand-holding for beginners; it assumes you know your way around an editor
  • Business plan has no SSO yet, which rules it out for some companies
  • Its own hosted AI is basic compared with the agents you can bring

Who each one is for

AttributeCursorQodoZed
Best for
  • Editing with AI autocomplete
  • Learning by watching changes happen
  • Multi-file changes in agent mode
  • Developers who like VS Code
  • Automatic first-pass pull request reviews
  • Enforcing team coding rules across repositories
  • Checking AI-written code before merge
  • Spotting missing tests and edge cases
  • Companies needing on-premise or single-tenant hosting
  • Running Claude Code inside an editor
  • Speed on big projects
  • Using your own AI subscription
  • Pairing with teammates in real time
You'll find it used by
  • Developers
  • Startup teams
  • Students
  • Technical founders
  • Software teams
  • Engineering managers
  • Tech leads
  • Enterprise development teams
  • Developers
  • Claude Code users
  • Open source fans
  • Small teams

Questions people ask

Which is better, Cursor, Qodo or Zed?

Zed scores highest overall in our ratings (Cursor 3.9/5, Qodo 3.7/5 and Zed 4.3/5). Cursor is best for editing with AI autocomplete and learning by watching changes happen. Qodo is best for automatic first-pass pull request reviews and enforcing team coding rules across repositories. Zed is best for Running Claude Code inside an editor and speed on big projects.

Which is cheaper, Cursor, Qodo or Zed?

Cursor: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at $8/mo. Qodo: There's no free plan. Paid plans start at From $30/mo in pooled credits. Zed: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at $10/mo.

How we compare

Ratings are our own, from using each tool, across ease of use, features, output quality, value for money, speed & reliability.

Swap in another tool

More tools from Coding & Dev Tools in the library.