Side-by-side comparison · Coding & Dev Tools
Cursor vs OpenAI Codex vs Qodo
Everything that matters when choosing between them, in one place: our rating, what each can do, what they cost, and the trade-offs.
Comparing 3 tools, the maximum.
At a glance
Pick it if: Developers and curious beginners who want AI help but still want a visual editor.
Pick it if: ChatGPT subscribers who want a coding agent without paying for a second subscription.
Pick it if: Software teams who want every pull request checked for bugs and against their coding standards before a person reviews it.
Overview
| Attribute | Cursor | OpenAI Codex | Qodo |
|---|---|---|---|
| In one line | A code editor with AI built in, for people who want to watch every change happen. | OpenAI's coding agent. Hand it a task and it works away while you do other things. | AI code review that checks every pull request against your team's rules before merge. |
| Pricing model | Freemium | Freemium | Paid |
| Starting price | $8/mo | $8/mo | From $30/mo in pooled credits |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes | No |
| Works with Claude Code | No | No | Yes |
Rating breakdown
Our scores out of 5. The higher bar in each row is highlighted.
| Attribute | Cursor | OpenAI Codex | Qodo |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 3.9 | 4.2Winner | 3.7 |
| Ease of useHow quickly someone non-technical gets value from it. | 4.0 | 3.5 | 4.0 |
| FeaturesHow completely it covers its own job, and how well the pieces fit together. | 4.5 | 4.5 | 4.0 |
| Output qualityHow good the results are before you fix them. | 4.0 | 4.5 | 3.5 |
| Value for moneyWhat you get for the price, including the free plan. | 3.0 | 4.5 | 3.0 |
| Speed & reliabilityHow fast it is and how often it falls over. | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 |
Feature comparison
A tick means it does this today. A dash means we haven't checked.
| Attribute | Cursor | OpenAI Codex | Qodo |
|---|---|---|---|
| Access & platform | |||
| Free plan | Yes | Yes | No |
| Mobile app | Yes | Yes | – |
| Desktop app | Yes | Yes | – |
| Browser extension | No | No | – |
| API access | – | Yes | – |
| Teams & business | |||
| Team workspace | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Enterprise plan or SSO | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Connects to other apps | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Open source or self-hosted | No | Yes | Yes |
| AI abilities | |||
| Works with your files | Yes | Yes | – |
| Understands images | Yes | Yes | – |
| Makes images | No | No | No |
| Makes video | No | No | No |
| Writes code | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Runs agents or automations | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Learns your brand or style | Yes | Yes | – |
| Works in many languages | Yes | Yes | – |
| Capabilities score | 12/ 17 | 14/ 17 | 6/ 17 |
Pricing
Plans as listed on each vendor's site when we last checked. Confirm before you buy.
| Attribute | Cursor | OpenAI Codex | Qodo |
|---|---|---|---|
| Plans | Free Free Trying the editor and a few agent runs. | Free Free A quick look at what it can do. | Free trial Free for 14 days Testing it on your own repositories. |
Plus $8/mo Light users who are happy with Grok models only. | Go $8/mo Occasional light tasks. | Pro TeamOur pick From $30/mo in pooled credits Teams of up to 30 developers. | |
PremiumOur pick $30/mo Most developers, especially if you want Claude alongside Grok. | PlusOur pick $20/mo Anyone who already pays for ChatGPT. | Enterprise Custom Larger organisations with security requirements. | |
Super or Ultra $100/mo or $200/mo Heavy daily agent users. | Pro From $100/mo Developers who hit the Plus limits. | ||
Legacy Pro $20/mo Existing subscribers only. New customers can't buy it. | Business $20/user/mo billed yearly, or $25 monthly Teams of 2 or more. | ||
Teams From $30/user/mo Companies that need admin controls and SSO. | Enterprise Custom Large organisations. | ||
| Which plan to pick | If you are on the old $20 Pro plan and it covers what you use, stay put; switching is permanent. New customers should skip Plus unless they are happy with Grok. Premium is the realistic starting point if you want Claude, and budget for the extra usage billing on top of the $30. Large companies can ask about a custom Enterprise plan. | If you already have ChatGPT Plus, you have Codex: just try it. If you are choosing between this and Claude Code with no existing subscription, Plus at $20 and Claude Pro at $20 cost the same, so pick whichever chat assistant you prefer. If you outgrow Plus, Pro starts at $100 and has no five-hour limit for now. The $200 tier gives new subscribers less usage than it used to, and Ultrafast mode is only on the $500 tier. | Run the 14-day trial on a busy repository and see how many credits a normal week uses before you pick a credit pack. Talk to sales only if you need SSO or on-premise hosting. |
Key features
| Attribute | Cursor | OpenAI Codex | Qodo |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standout features |
|
|
|
Pros and cons
| Attribute | Cursor | OpenAI Codex | Qodo |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pros |
|
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
|
Who each one is for
| Attribute | Cursor | OpenAI Codex | Qodo |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best for |
|
|
|
| You'll find it used by |
|
|
|
Questions people ask
Which is better, Cursor, OpenAI Codex or Qodo?
OpenAI Codex scores highest overall in our ratings (Cursor 3.9/5, OpenAI Codex 4.2/5 and Qodo 3.7/5). Cursor is best for editing with AI autocomplete and learning by watching changes happen. OpenAI Codex is best for background tasks in the cloud and starting a task from your phone. Qodo is best for automatic first-pass pull request reviews and enforcing team coding rules across repositories.
Which is cheaper, Cursor, OpenAI Codex or Qodo?
Cursor: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at $8/mo. OpenAI Codex: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at $8/mo. Qodo: There's no free plan. Paid plans start at From $30/mo in pooled credits.
How we compare
Ratings are our own, from using each tool, across ease of use, features, output quality, value for money, speed & reliability.
Swap in another tool
More tools from Coding & Dev Tools in the library.
