Skip to content

Side-by-side comparison · Coding & Dev Tools

Cursor vs OpenAI Codex vs Warp

Everything that matters when choosing between them, in one place: our rating, what each can do, what they cost, and the trade-offs.

Cursor

3.9

From $8/mo

Best overall

OpenAI Codex

4.2

From $8/mo

Warp

4.1

From $20/mo

Comparing 3 tools, the maximum.

At a glance

Pick it if: Developers and curious beginners who want AI help but still want a visual editor.

Best overallBest value

Pick it if: ChatGPT subscribers who want a coding agent without paying for a second subscription.

Warp4.1
Easiest to use

Pick it if: Anyone who has to use the terminal but never wanted to learn it.

Overview

AttributeCursorOpenAI CodexWarp
In one lineA code editor with AI built in, for people who want to watch every change happen.OpenAI's coding agent. Hand it a task and it works away while you do other things.A modern terminal where you can type what you want in plain English instead of commands.
Pricing modelFreemiumFreemiumFreemium
Starting price$8/mo$8/mo$20/mo
Free plan Yes Yes Yes
Works with Claude Code No No No

Rating breakdown

Our scores out of 5. The higher bar in each row is highlighted.

AttributeCursorOpenAI CodexWarp
Overall rating3.94.2Winner4.1
Ease of useHow quickly someone non-technical gets value from it.
4.0
3.5
4.5
FeaturesHow completely it covers the job it's built for, and how well the pieces fit together.
4.5
4.5
4.0
Output qualityHow good the results are before you fix them.
4.0
4.5
3.5
Value for moneyWhat you get for the price, including the free plan.
3.0
4.5
4.0
Speed & reliabilityHow fast it is and how often it falls over.
4.0
4.0
4.5

Feature comparison

A tick means it does this today. A dash means we haven't checked.

AttributeCursorOpenAI CodexWarp
Access & platform
Free plan Yes Yes Yes
Mobile app Yes Yes No
Desktop app Yes Yes Yes
Browser extension No No No
API access– Yes–
Teams & business
Team workspace Yes Yes Yes
Enterprise plan or SSO Yes Yes Yes
Connects to other apps Yes Yes Yes
Open source or self-hosted No Yes No
AI abilities
Works with your files Yes Yes Yes
Understands images Yes Yes–
Makes images No No No
Makes video No No No
Writes code Yes Yes Yes
Runs agents or automations Yes Yes Yes
Learns your brand or style Yes Yes Yes
Works in many languages Yes Yes Yes
Capabilities score12/ 1714/ 1710/ 17

Pricing

Plans as listed on each vendor's site when we last checked. Confirm before you buy.

AttributeCursorOpenAI CodexWarp
Plans

Free

Free

Trying the editor and a few agent runs.

Free

Free

A quick look at what it can do.

FreeOur pick

Free

Everyone who just wants a better terminal.

Plus

$8/mo

Light users who are happy with Grok models only.

Go

$8/mo

Occasional light tasks.

Build

$20/mo, or $18/mo billed yearly

People who lean on the Warp agent daily.

PremiumOur pick

$30/mo

Most developers who want Claude or OpenAI models.

PlusOur pick

$20/mo

Anyone who already pays for ChatGPT.

Max

$200/mo, or $180/mo billed yearly

Heavy agent users.

Super

$100/mo

Heavy daily agent users.

Pro

From $100/mo

Developers who hit the Plus limits.

Business

$50/user/mo, or $45/user/mo billed yearly

Teams that need SSO and usage metrics.

Teams

From $30/user/mo

Companies that need admin controls and SSO.

Business

$20/user/mo billed yearly, or $25 monthly

Teams of 2 or more.

Enterprise

Custom

Large organisations.

Enterprise

Custom

Large organisations.

Enterprise

Custom

Large organisations.

Which plan to pickSkip Plus unless you are happy with Grok. Premium is the realistic starting point if you want Claude or OpenAI models, and budget for the extra usage billing on top of the $30. There is also a $200 Ultra plan with 50x the Plus usage for people who live in it.If you already have ChatGPT Plus, you have Codex: just try it. If you are choosing between this and Claude Code with no existing subscription, Plus at $20 and Claude Pro at $20 cost the same, so pick whichever chat assistant you prefer.Stay on Free. The terminal is the product, and you can run Claude Code inside it on your Claude subscription without paying Warp anything. Only buy Build if you find yourself using Warp's own agent more than Claude Code.

Key features

AttributeCursorOpenAI CodexWarp
Standout features
  • Tab autocomplete
  • Agent mode
  • Chat with your codebase
  • Cloud agents and automations
  • Rules
  • Built on VS Code
  • Cloud tasks
  • Desktop app and CLI
  • Start from your phone
  • Automatic code review
  • AGENTS.md
  • Open source CLI
  • Plain-English commands
  • A proper text editor for commands
  • Blocks and searchable history
  • Warp agent
  • Home for other agents
  • Shared workflows

Pros and cons

AttributeCursorOpenAI CodexWarp
Pros
  • The clearest view of what an AI is doing to your code
  • Autocomplete is still the best in the category
  • Feels familiar instantly if you have used VS Code
  • Cloud agents and code review on the mid plans
  • Included with every ChatGPT plan, so many people already have it
  • Cloud tasks let you start work from anywhere and come back later
  • Strong on tough, multi-file coding jobs
  • The CLI is open source and works with an API key
  • The best-looking and most forgiving terminal available
  • Plain-English commands remove the biggest barrier for beginners
  • Free for the terminal itself, with your own AI keys allowed
  • Fast, and runs on Mac, Windows and Linux
Cons
  • Cheap plans only give you Grok models
  • Claude and OpenAI usage is billed on top of the subscription, so the real cost is hard to predict
  • The pricing page is confusing and has changed several times this year
  • Agent runs are less thorough than Claude Code on big tasks
  • Five-hour and weekly limits bite on Plus if you use it seriously
  • Cloud tasks use more of your allowance than local ones
  • It asks fewer questions than Claude Code before changing things
  • Model names and limits change often, which makes it hard to plan costs
  • Its own agent is a step behind Claude Code and Codex
  • Metered agent usage on paid plans runs out faster than you expect
  • You need an account to use it, which some developers dislike
  • Not an editor, so you still need another tool to browse files

Who each one is for

AttributeCursorOpenAI CodexWarp
Best for
  • Editing with AI autocomplete
  • Learning by watching changes happen
  • Multi-file changes in agent mode
  • Developers who like VS Code
  • Background tasks in the cloud
  • Starting a task from your phone
  • Developers already on ChatGPT Plus
  • Coding in the terminal
  • A nicer home for Claude Code
  • Plain-English commands
  • Searchable command history
  • Sharing commands with your team
You'll find it used by
  • Developers
  • Startup teams
  • Students
  • Technical founders
  • ChatGPT subscribers
  • Developers
  • Startup teams
  • Solo founders
  • Developers
  • Ops teams
  • Terminal beginners
  • Founders

Questions people ask

Which is better, Cursor, OpenAI Codex or Warp?

OpenAI Codex scores highest overall in our ratings (Cursor 3.9/5, OpenAI Codex 4.2/5 and Warp 4.1/5). Cursor is best for editing with AI autocomplete and learning by watching changes happen. OpenAI Codex is best for background tasks in the cloud and starting a task from your phone. Warp is best for A nicer home for Claude Code and Plain-English commands.

Which is cheaper, Cursor, OpenAI Codex or Warp?

Cursor: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at $8/mo. OpenAI Codex: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at $8/mo. Warp: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at $20/mo.

Which is easier to use, Cursor, OpenAI Codex or Warp?

Warp rates highest for ease of use in our scores. Anyone who has to use the terminal but never wanted to learn it.

How we compare

Ratings are our own, from using each tool, across ease of use, features, output quality, value for money, speed & reliability.

Swap in another tool

More tools from Coding & Dev Tools in the library.