Skip to content

Side-by-side comparison · Coding & Dev Tools

Cursor vs OpenAI Codex vs Zed

Everything that matters when choosing between them, in one place: our rating, what each can do, what they cost, and the trade-offs.

Cursor

3.9

From $8/mo

OpenAI Codex

4.2

From $8/mo

Best overall

Zed

4.3

From $10/mo

Comparing 3 tools, the maximum.

At a glance

Easiest to use

Pick it if: Developers and curious beginners who want AI help but still want a visual editor.

Pick it if: ChatGPT subscribers who want a coding agent without paying for a second subscription.

Zed4.3
Best overallBest value

Pick it if: Developers who want a fast editor and already pay for Claude or another AI provider.

Overview

AttributeCursorOpenAI CodexZed
In one lineA code editor with AI built in, for people who want to watch every change happen.OpenAI's coding agent. Hand it a task and it works away while you do other things.A fast, free, open-source code editor that runs Claude Code and other AI agents inside it.
Pricing modelFreemiumFreemiumOpen source
Starting price$8/mo$8/mo$10/mo
Free plan Yes Yes Yes
Works with Claude Code No No Yes

Rating breakdown

Our scores out of 5. The higher bar in each row is highlighted.

AttributeCursorOpenAI CodexZed
Overall rating3.94.24.3Winner
Ease of useHow quickly someone non-technical gets value from it.
4.0
3.5
3.5
FeaturesHow completely it covers the job it's built for, and how well the pieces fit together.
4.5
4.5
4.0
Output qualityHow good the results are before you fix them.
4.0
4.5
4.0
Value for moneyWhat you get for the price, including the free plan.
3.0
4.5
5.0
Speed & reliabilityHow fast it is and how often it falls over.
4.0
4.0
5.0

Feature comparison

A tick means it does this today. A dash means we haven't checked.

AttributeCursorOpenAI CodexZed
Access & platform
Free plan Yes Yes Yes
Mobile app Yes Yes No
Desktop app Yes Yes Yes
Browser extension No No No
API access– Yes–
Teams & business
Team workspace Yes Yes Yes
Enterprise plan or SSO Yes Yes No
Connects to other apps Yes Yes Yes
Open source or self-hosted No Yes Yes
AI abilities
Works with your files Yes Yes Yes
Understands images Yes Yes Yes
Makes images No No No
Makes video No No No
Writes code Yes Yes Yes
Runs agents or automations Yes Yes Yes
Learns your brand or style Yes Yes Yes
Works in many languages Yes Yes Yes
Capabilities score12/ 1714/ 1711/ 17

Pricing

Plans as listed on each vendor's site when we last checked. Confirm before you buy.

AttributeCursorOpenAI CodexZed
Plans

Free

Free

Trying the editor and a few agent runs.

Free

Free

A quick look at what it can do.

PersonalOur pick

Free

Almost everyone.

Plus

$8/mo

Light users who are happy with Grok models only.

Go

$8/mo

Occasional light tasks.

Pro

$10/mo

People who want Zed's hosted AI without managing keys.

PremiumOur pick

$30/mo

Most developers who want Claude or OpenAI models.

PlusOur pick

$20/mo

Anyone who already pays for ChatGPT.

Business

$30/seat/mo

Teams that need spending and access controls.

Super

$100/mo

Heavy daily agent users.

Pro

From $100/mo

Developers who hit the Plus limits.

Teams

From $30/user/mo

Companies that need admin controls and SSO.

Business

$20/user/mo billed yearly, or $25 monthly

Teams of 2 or more.

Enterprise

Custom

Large organisations.

Enterprise

Custom

Large organisations.

Which plan to pickSkip Plus unless you are happy with Grok. Premium is the realistic starting point if you want Claude or OpenAI models, and budget for the extra usage billing on top of the $30. There is also a $200 Ultra plan with 50x the Plus usage for people who live in it.If you already have ChatGPT Plus, you have Codex: just try it. If you are choosing between this and Claude Code with no existing subscription, Plus at $20 and Claude Pro at $20 cost the same, so pick whichever chat assistant you prefer.Personal. If you have Claude Pro, run Claude Code inside Zed and you are done. Pro only makes sense if you want Zed's built-in assistant and edit predictions without setting up API keys.

Key features

AttributeCursorOpenAI CodexZed
Standout features
  • Tab autocomplete
  • Agent mode
  • Chat with your codebase
  • Cloud agents and automations
  • Rules
  • Built on VS Code
  • Cloud tasks
  • Desktop app and CLI
  • Start from your phone
  • Automatic code review
  • AGENTS.md
  • Open source CLI
  • Built for speed
  • External agents inside the editor
  • Bring your own keys
  • Edit predictions
  • Real-time collaboration
  • Open source

Pros and cons

AttributeCursorOpenAI CodexZed
Pros
  • The clearest view of what an AI is doing to your code
  • Autocomplete is still the best in the category
  • Feels familiar instantly if you have used VS Code
  • Cloud agents and code review on the mid plans
  • Included with every ChatGPT plan, so many people already have it
  • Cloud tasks let you start work from anywhere and come back later
  • Strong on tough, multi-file coding jobs
  • The CLI is open source and works with an API key
  • Noticeably faster than VS Code and Cursor
  • Free, open source, and no charge for running your own agents
  • Clean agent panel that shows exactly what changed
  • Built-in real-time collaboration
Cons
  • Cheap plans only give you Grok models
  • Claude and OpenAI usage is billed on top of the subscription, so the real cost is hard to predict
  • The pricing page is confusing and has changed several times this year
  • Agent runs are less thorough than Claude Code on big tasks
  • Five-hour and weekly limits bite on Plus if you use it seriously
  • Cloud tasks use more of your allowance than local ones
  • It asks fewer questions than Claude Code before changing things
  • Model names and limits change often, which makes it hard to plan costs
  • Smaller extension library than VS Code or Cursor
  • Less hand-holding for beginners; it assumes you know your way around an editor
  • Business plan has no SSO yet, which rules it out for some companies
  • Its own hosted AI is basic compared with the agents you can bring

Who each one is for

AttributeCursorOpenAI CodexZed
Best for
  • Editing with AI autocomplete
  • Learning by watching changes happen
  • Multi-file changes in agent mode
  • Developers who like VS Code
  • Background tasks in the cloud
  • Starting a task from your phone
  • Developers already on ChatGPT Plus
  • Coding in the terminal
  • Running Claude Code inside an editor
  • Speed on big projects
  • Using your own AI subscription
  • Pairing with teammates in real time
You'll find it used by
  • Developers
  • Startup teams
  • Students
  • Technical founders
  • ChatGPT subscribers
  • Developers
  • Startup teams
  • Solo founders
  • Developers
  • Claude Code users
  • Open source fans
  • Small teams

Questions people ask

Which is better, Cursor, OpenAI Codex or Zed?

Zed scores highest overall in our ratings (Cursor 3.9/5, OpenAI Codex 4.2/5 and Zed 4.3/5). Cursor is best for editing with AI autocomplete and learning by watching changes happen. OpenAI Codex is best for background tasks in the cloud and starting a task from your phone. Zed is best for Running Claude Code inside an editor and speed on big projects.

Which is cheaper, Cursor, OpenAI Codex or Zed?

Cursor: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at $8/mo. OpenAI Codex: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at $8/mo. Zed: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at $10/mo.

Which is easier to use, Cursor, OpenAI Codex or Zed?

Cursor rates highest for ease of use in our scores. Developers and curious beginners who want AI help but still want a visual editor.

How we compare

Ratings are our own, from using each tool, across ease of use, features, output quality, value for money, speed & reliability.

Swap in another tool

More tools from Coding & Dev Tools in the library.