Skip to content

Side-by-side comparison · Research & Search

Consensus vs Elicit vs Perplexity (Research)

Everything that matters when choosing between them, in one place: our rating, what each can do, what they cost, and the trade-offs.

Consensus

4.1

From $20/mo

Elicit

3.8

From $49/user/mo

Best overall

Perplexity (Research)

4.6

From $17/mo

Comparing 3 tools, the maximum.

At a glance

Consensus

4.1

Pick it if: Anyone who wants to know whether something is backed by actual studies before repeating it.

Elicit

3.8

Pick it if: Researchers, students and analysts who need to review a lot of papers carefully.

Perplexity (Research)

4.6
Best overallBest value

Pick it if: Anyone who would otherwise spend an afternoon reading tabs to answer one question.

Overview

AttributeConsensusElicitPerplexity (Research)
In one lineSearches academic papers and tells you what the evidence actually says.Finds, screens and summarises research papers into a comparison table.Runs dozens of searches on a question and hands back a cited report in minutes.
Pricing modelFreemiumFreemiumFreemium
Starting price$20/mo$49/user/mo$17/mo
Free plan Yes Yes Yes
Works with Claude Code No No Yes

Rating breakdown

Our scores out of 5. The higher bar in each row is highlighted.

AttributeConsensusElicitPerplexity (Research)
Overall rating4.13.84.6Winner
Ease of useHow quickly someone non-technical gets value from it.
4.5
3.5
4.5
FeaturesHow much it can do, and how well the pieces fit together.
3.5
4.5
4.5
Output qualityHow good the results are before you fix them.
4.0
4.5
4.5
Value for moneyWhat you get for the price, including the free plan.
4.0
3.0
4.5
Speed & reliabilityHow fast it is and how often it falls over.
4.5
3.5
5.0

Feature comparison

A tick means it does this today. A dash means we haven't checked.

AttributeConsensusElicitPerplexity (Research)
Access & platform
Free plan Yes Yes Yes
Mobile app– No Yes
Desktop app No No Yes
Browser extension– No Yes
API access Yes Yes Yes
Teams & business
Team workspace Yes Yes Yes
Enterprise plan or SSO Yes Yes Yes
Connects to other apps Yes Yes Yes
Open source or self-hosted No No No
AI abilities
Works with your files– Yes Yes
Understands images No– Yes
Makes images No No Yes
Makes video No No Yes
Writes code No No Yes
Runs agents or automations No Yes Yes
Learns your brand or style No No No
Works in many languages–– Yes
Capabilities score5/ 177/ 1715/ 17

Pricing

Plans as listed on each vendor's site when we last checked. Confirm before you buy.

AttributeConsensusElicitPerplexity (Research)
Plans

Free

Free

Occasional fact-checking.

Basic

Free

Searching and reading a few papers.

Free

Free

Quick sourced answers and a taste of research mode.

ProOur pick

$20/mo, or $12/mo billed yearly

Anyone who checks evidence weekly.

ProOur pick

$49/user/mo billed yearly

Anyone doing a real literature review.

ProOur pick

$17/mo billed yearly

Anyone who researches most days.

Deep

$65/mo, or $45/mo billed yearly

Researchers and clinicians doing frequent literature reviews.

Scale

$169/user/mo billed yearly

Teams running many reviews at once.

Max

$200/mo, or $167/mo billed yearly

Heavy users who also want the Computer agent and the newest models first.

Teams

Custom

Labs, departments and research groups.

Enterprise

Custom

Universities, pharma and large research groups.

Enterprise Pro

From $40/seat/mo

Teams that need admin controls and shared billing.

Which plan to pickStart on Free. If you find yourself rationing the 10 Pro messages, Pro billed yearly is good value at $12 a month. Deep is only for people whose job is literature reviews; most readers here will never need it.Stay on Basic unless you have a review to run. When you do, Pro has everything one person needs, and the yearly commitment is the only way to get the quoted price. Scale is for teams, not for a solo researcher who wants more headroom.Pro is the one. The free plan is too tight to judge research mode properly, and Max only makes sense if you want the Computer agent or you hit Pro limits every day. Businesses with a few people on it should look at Enterprise Pro for the admin controls.

Key features

AttributeConsensusElicitPerplexity (Research)
Standout features
  • Consensus Meter
  • Pro messages
  • Deep reviews
  • Study Snapshots
  • Quality filters
  • API and MCP
  • Research Reports
  • Extraction tables
  • Systematic Review workflow
  • Chat with papers
  • Routines
  • Library and sharing
  • Research mode
  • Pro Search
  • Model selection
  • Spaces
  • Comet browser and connectors
  • Premium data sources

Pros and cons

AttributeConsensusElicitPerplexity (Research)
Pros
  • Consensus Meter gives an honest read on mixed evidence in seconds
  • Every summary links to the actual paper
  • Free plan is enough for occasional checks
  • Pro is cheap when billed yearly
  • Quality filters help you ignore weak studies
  • Extraction tables save days on a literature review
  • Every answer links back to the passage in the paper
  • Systematic review workflow records why papers were included or excluded
  • Routines keep a review current without you remembering to check
  • Free plan is useful for reading and summarising
  • Reports land in minutes, not the quarter hour Gemini and ChatGPT often take
  • Every claim is linked, so you can check the ones that matter
  • Lets you pick which AI model answers on paid plans
  • Official connector for Claude Code and Claude Desktop
  • Good apps for Mac, Windows, iPhone and Android
Cons
  • Only covers academic research; no business or news sources
  • Can make thin or old evidence look more settled than it is
  • Monthly billing on Pro is nearly double the yearly rate
  • Deep review limits are low until you pay for the Deep plan
  • $49 a user a month is a lot for anyone outside research
  • Only academic papers; no business, news or grey literature
  • Extractions still need spot-checking against the source
  • Reports and large screens take a while to run
  • Collaboration is locked to the $169 Scale plan
  • Free plan allows just one research run a month
  • Cites weak sources as confidently as strong ones
  • Only sees what is published on the open web; useless for your own documents
  • Usage limits on Pro are described as average use rather than a clear number

Who each one is for

AttributeConsensusElicitPerplexity (Research)
Best for
  • Fact-checking health claims
  • Finding studies on a topic
  • Evidence for a blog or pitch
  • Student literature reviews
  • Literature reviews
  • Extracting data from papers
  • Screening papers by criteria
  • Comparing studies in a table
  • Market and competitor overviews
  • Quick background on a topic
  • Sourced answers to factual questions
  • Research from Claude Code
You'll find it used by
  • Health and wellness brands
  • Content marketers
  • Students
  • Clinicians
  • Researchers
  • Analysts
  • Clinicians
  • Postgraduate students
  • Marketers
  • Founders
  • Consultants
  • Analysts

How we compare

Ratings are our own, from using each tool, across ease of use, features, output quality, value for money, speed & reliability. The "Visit" buttons may use affiliate links, which never affect a score.

Swap in another tool

More research & search tools from the library.