Skip to content

Side-by-side comparison · Research & Search

Consensus vs Elicit vs ChatGPT Deep Research

Everything that matters when choosing between them, in one place: our rating, what each can do, what they cost, and the trade-offs.

Best overall

Consensus

4.1

From $20/mo

Elicit

3.8

From $49/user/mo

ChatGPT Deep Research

3.8

From $8/mo

Comparing 3 tools, the maximum.

At a glance

Consensus

4.1
Best overallBest valueEasiest to use

Pick it if: Anyone who wants to know whether something is backed by actual studies before repeating it.

Elicit

3.8

Pick it if: Researchers, students and analysts who need to review a lot of papers carefully.

ChatGPT Deep Research

3.8

Pick it if: ChatGPT users who want a proper write-up on a question and are happy to wait a few minutes for it.

Overview

AttributeConsensusElicitChatGPT Deep Research
In one lineSearches academic papers and tells you what the evidence actually says.Finds, screens and summarises research papers into a comparison table.ChatGPT's research mode, which browses for you and writes up a cited report.
Pricing modelFreemiumFreemiumFreemium
Starting price$20/mo$49/user/mo$8/mo
Free plan Yes Yes Yes
Works with Claude Code No No No

Rating breakdown

Our scores out of 5. The higher bar in each row is highlighted.

AttributeConsensusElicitChatGPT Deep Research
Overall rating4.1Winner3.83.8
Ease of useHow quickly someone non-technical gets value from it.
4.5
3.5
4.0
FeaturesHow much it can do, and how well the pieces fit together.
3.5
4.5
4.0
Output qualityHow good the results are before you fix them.
4.0
4.5
4.5
Value for moneyWhat you get for the price, including the free plan.
4.0
3.0
3.5
Speed & reliabilityHow fast it is and how often it falls over.
4.5
3.5
3.0

Feature comparison

A tick means it does this today. A dash means we haven't checked.

AttributeConsensusElicitChatGPT Deep Research
Access & platform
Free plan Yes Yes Yes
Mobile app– No Yes
Desktop app No No Yes
Browser extension– No Yes
API access Yes Yes Yes
Teams & business
Team workspace Yes Yes Yes
Enterprise plan or SSO Yes Yes Yes
Connects to other apps Yes Yes Yes
Open source or self-hosted No No No
AI abilities
Works with your files– Yes Yes
Understands images No– Yes
Makes images No No Yes
Makes video No No Yes
Writes code No No Yes
Runs agents or automations No Yes Yes
Learns your brand or style No No Yes
Works in many languages–– Yes
Capabilities score5/ 177/ 1716/ 17

Pricing

Plans as listed on each vendor's site when we last checked. Confirm before you buy.

AttributeConsensusElicitChatGPT Deep Research
Plans

Free

Free

Occasional fact-checking.

Basic

Free

Searching and reading a few papers.

Free

Free

Seeing what a report looks like.

ProOur pick

$20/mo, or $12/mo billed yearly

Anyone who checks evidence weekly.

ProOur pick

$49/user/mo billed yearly

Anyone doing a real literature review.

Go

$8/mo

Casual users who want more chat, not more research.

Deep

$65/mo, or $45/mo billed yearly

Researchers and clinicians doing frequent literature reviews.

Scale

$169/user/mo billed yearly

Teams running many reviews at once.

PlusOur pick

$20/mo

Anyone who wants deep research weekly.

Teams

Custom

Labs, departments and research groups.

Enterprise

Custom

Universities, pharma and large research groups.

Pro

From $100/mo

Heavy users who run research daily.

Which plan to pickStart on Free. If you find yourself rationing the 10 Pro messages, Pro billed yearly is good value at $12 a month. Deep is only for people whose job is literature reviews; most readers here will never need it.Stay on Basic unless you have a review to run. When you do, Pro has everything one person needs, and the yearly commitment is the only way to get the quoted price. Scale is for teams, not for a solo researcher who wants more headroom.If you have Plus already, you are set; its deep research allowance covers most people. Do not buy ChatGPT just for research unless you also want the rest of it, because Perplexity Pro costs less and is faster. Pro is only worth it if you run reports every day.

Key features

AttributeConsensusElicitChatGPT Deep Research
Standout features
  • Consensus Meter
  • Pro messages
  • Deep reviews
  • Study Snapshots
  • Quality filters
  • API and MCP
  • Research Reports
  • Extraction tables
  • Systematic Review workflow
  • Chat with papers
  • Routines
  • Library and sharing
  • Clarifying questions
  • Long, cited reports
  • Runs in the background
  • Your own files and apps
  • Visual output
  • Agent mode

Pros and cons

AttributeConsensusElicitChatGPT Deep Research
Pros
  • Consensus Meter gives an honest read on mixed evidence in seconds
  • Every summary links to the actual paper
  • Free plan is enough for occasional checks
  • Pro is cheap when billed yearly
  • Quality filters help you ignore weak studies
  • Extraction tables save days on a literature review
  • Every answer links back to the passage in the paper
  • Systematic review workflow records why papers were included or excluded
  • Routines keep a review current without you remembering to check
  • Free plan is useful for reading and summarising
  • Clarifying questions up front mean fewer wasted runs
  • Among the most complete and well-structured reports of the three
  • Runs in the background and notifies you when done
  • Can bring your own files and connected apps into the research
  • Exports to PDF with charts and tables
Cons
  • Only covers academic research; no business or news sources
  • Can make thin or old evidence look more settled than it is
  • Monthly billing on Pro is nearly double the yearly rate
  • Deep review limits are low until you pay for the Deep plan
  • $49 a user a month is a lot for anyone outside research
  • Only academic papers; no business, news or grey literature
  • Extractions still need spot-checking against the source
  • Reports and large screens take a while to run
  • Collaboration is locked to the $169 Scale plan
  • Slowest of the three; 10 to 30 minutes is normal
  • Free and Go allowances are tiny and described only as limited
  • Reports run long and occasionally cite weak sources
  • Pro usage allowances have been cut for new subscribers

Who each one is for

AttributeConsensusElicitChatGPT Deep Research
Best for
  • Fact-checking health claims
  • Finding studies on a topic
  • Evidence for a blog or pitch
  • Student literature reviews
  • Literature reviews
  • Extracting data from papers
  • Screening papers by criteria
  • Comparing studies in a table
  • Market and industry scans
  • Comparing products or suppliers
  • Background briefs on a new topic
  • Reading lots of sources at once
You'll find it used by
  • Health and wellness brands
  • Content marketers
  • Students
  • Clinicians
  • Researchers
  • Analysts
  • Clinicians
  • Postgraduate students
  • ChatGPT subscribers
  • Marketers
  • Founders
  • Analysts

How we compare

Ratings are our own, from using each tool, across ease of use, features, output quality, value for money, speed & reliability. The "Visit" buttons may use affiliate links, which never affect a score.

Swap in another tool

More research & search tools from the library.