Skip to content

Side-by-side comparison · Research & Search

Consensus vs Elicit vs Prompt Cowboy

Everything that matters when choosing between them, in one place: our rating, what each can do, what they cost, and the trade-offs.

Best overall

Consensus

4.1

From $20/mo

Elicit

3.8

From $49/user/mo

Prompt Cowboy

3.9

From $8/mo

Comparing 3 tools, the maximum.

At a glance

Consensus

4.1
Best overall

Pick it if: Anyone who wants to know whether something is backed by actual studies before repeating it.

Elicit

3.8

Pick it if: Researchers, students and analysts who need to review a lot of papers carefully.

Prompt Cowboy

3.9
Easiest to use

Pick it if: Anyone who feels their AI results are mediocre and suspects the prompt is the reason.

Overview

AttributeConsensusElicitPrompt Cowboy
In one lineSearches academic papers and tells you what the evidence actually says.Finds, screens and summarises research papers into a comparison table.Turns a rough one-line idea into a detailed, well-structured prompt for any AI tool.
Pricing modelFreemiumFreemiumFreemium
Starting price$20/mo$49/user/mo$8/mo
Free plan Yes Yes Yes
Works with Claude Code No No No

Rating breakdown

Our scores out of 5. The higher bar in each row is highlighted.

AttributeConsensusElicitPrompt Cowboy
Overall rating4.1Winner3.83.9
Ease of useHow quickly someone non-technical gets value from it.
4.5
3.5
5.0
FeaturesHow much it can do, and how well the pieces fit together.
3.5
4.5
2.5
Output qualityHow good the results are before you fix them.
4.0
4.5
3.5
Value for moneyWhat you get for the price, including the free plan.
4.0
3.0
4.0
Speed & reliabilityHow fast it is and how often it falls over.
4.5
3.5
4.5

Feature comparison

A tick means it does this today. A dash means we haven't checked.

AttributeConsensusElicitPrompt Cowboy
Access & platform
Free plan Yes Yes Yes
Mobile app– No No
Desktop app No No No
Browser extension– No–
API access Yes Yes–
Teams & business
Team workspace Yes Yes Yes
Enterprise plan or SSO Yes Yes No
Connects to other apps Yes Yes No
Open source or self-hosted No No No
AI abilities
Works with your files– Yes No
Understands images No– No
Makes images No No No
Makes video No No No
Writes code No No No
Runs agents or automations No Yes No
Learns your brand or style No No Yes
Works in many languages–––
Capabilities score5/ 177/ 173/ 17

Pricing

Plans as listed on each vendor's site when we last checked. Confirm before you buy.

AttributeConsensusElicitPrompt Cowboy
Plans

Free

Free

Occasional fact-checking.

Basic

Free

Searching and reading a few papers.

FreeOur pick

Free

Learning what a good prompt looks like.

ProOur pick

$20/mo, or $12/mo billed yearly

Anyone who checks evidence weekly.

ProOur pick

$49/user/mo billed yearly

Anyone doing a real literature review.

Individual

$8/mo

People who use it daily and want prompts in their own voice.

Deep

$65/mo, or $45/mo billed yearly

Researchers and clinicians doing frequent literature reviews.

Scale

$169/user/mo billed yearly

Teams running many reviews at once.

Team

See website

Small teams who want shared instructions.

Teams

Custom

Labs, departments and research groups.

Enterprise

Custom

Universities, pharma and large research groups.

Which plan to pickStart on Free. If you find yourself rationing the 10 Pro messages, Pro billed yearly is good value at $12 a month. Deep is only for people whose job is literature reviews; most readers here will never need it.Stay on Basic unless you have a review to run. When you do, Pro has everything one person needs, and the yearly commitment is the only way to get the quoted price. Scale is for teams, not for a solo researcher who wants more headroom.Free is genuinely enough for most people. Pay for Individual only if you are writing prompts all day and the style matching would save you editing time. Check the Team price on the site; it was not shown on the pricing page when we looked.

Key features

AttributeConsensusElicitPrompt Cowboy
Standout features
  • Consensus Meter
  • Pro messages
  • Deep reviews
  • Study Snapshots
  • Quality filters
  • API and MCP
  • Research Reports
  • Extraction tables
  • Systematic Review workflow
  • Chat with papers
  • Routines
  • Library and sharing
  • Prompt expansion
  • Prompt types
  • Library
  • Style matching
  • Memories

Pros and cons

AttributeConsensusElicitPrompt Cowboy
Pros
  • Consensus Meter gives an honest read on mixed evidence in seconds
  • Every summary links to the actual paper
  • Free plan is enough for occasional checks
  • Pro is cheap when billed yearly
  • Quality filters help you ignore weak studies
  • Extraction tables save days on a literature review
  • Every answer links back to the passage in the paper
  • Systematic review workflow records why papers were included or excluded
  • Routines keep a review current without you remembering to check
  • Free plan is useful for reading and summarising
  • Zero setup; the free plan is unlimited
  • Visibly improves the answers you get from Claude or ChatGPT
  • Teaches you prompt structure by example
  • Cheap paid plan with writing-style matching
Cons
  • Only covers academic research; no business or news sources
  • Can make thin or old evidence look more settled than it is
  • Monthly billing on Pro is nearly double the yearly rate
  • Deep review limits are low until you pay for the Deep plan
  • $49 a user a month is a lot for anyone outside research
  • Only academic papers; no business, news or grey literature
  • Extractions still need spot-checking against the source
  • Reports and large screens take a while to run
  • Collaboration is locked to the $169 Scale plan
  • A single feature rather than a product; you may outgrow it in weeks
  • Extra copy and paste step for every prompt
  • No integrations, API or browser extension that we could confirm
  • Small team, so features and prices shift often

Who each one is for

AttributeConsensusElicitPrompt Cowboy
Best for
  • Fact-checking health claims
  • Finding studies on a topic
  • Evidence for a blog or pitch
  • Student literature reviews
  • Literature reviews
  • Extracting data from papers
  • Screening papers by criteria
  • Comparing studies in a table
  • Better prompts for Claude and ChatGPT
  • Deep-research briefs
  • Video prompts for Veo
  • Learning prompt structure
You'll find it used by
  • Health and wellness brands
  • Content marketers
  • Students
  • Clinicians
  • Researchers
  • Analysts
  • Clinicians
  • Postgraduate students
  • Marketers
  • Small business owners
  • Beginners
  • Content creators

How we compare

Ratings are our own, from using each tool, across ease of use, features, output quality, value for money, speed & reliability. The "Visit" buttons may use affiliate links, which never affect a score.

Swap in another tool

More research & search tools from the library.