Skip to content

Side-by-side comparison · Research & Search

Consensus vs Elicit vs Kagi

Everything that matters when choosing between them, in one place: our rating, what each can do, what they cost, and the trade-offs.

Consensus

4.3

From $20/mo

Elicit

3.8

From $49/user/mo

Kagi

4.3

From $5/mo

Comparing 3 tools, the maximum.

At a glance

Best value

Pick it if: Anyone who wants to know whether something is backed by actual studies before repeating it.

Pick it if: Researchers, students and analysts who need to review a lot of papers carefully.

Kagi4.3

Pick it if: People who search all day for work and are tired of ads and spammy results.

Overview

AttributeConsensusElicitKagi
In one lineSearches academic papers and tells you what the evidence actually says.Finds, screens and summarises research papers into a comparison table.A paid search engine with no ads or tracking, plus an AI assistant that cites sources.
Pricing modelFreemiumFreemiumPaid
Starting price$20/mo$49/user/mo$5/mo
Free plan Yes Yes No
Works with Claude Code No No Yes

Rating breakdown

Our scores out of 5. The higher bar in each row is highlighted.

AttributeConsensusElicitKagi
Overall rating4.33.84.3
Ease of useHow quickly someone non-technical gets value from it.
4.5
3.5
4.5
FeaturesHow completely it covers its own job, and how well the pieces fit together.
4.5
4.5
4.5
Output qualityHow good the results are before you fix them.
4.0
4.5
4.5
Value for moneyWhat you get for the price, including the free plan.
4.0
3.0
3.5
Speed & reliabilityHow fast it is and how often it falls over.
4.5
3.5
4.5

Feature comparison

A tick means it does this today. A dash means we haven't checked.

AttributeConsensusElicitKagi
Access & platform
Free plan Yes Yes No
Mobile app– No Yes
Desktop app No No No
Browser extension– No Yes
API access Yes Yes Yes
Teams & business
Team workspace Yes Yes Yes
Enterprise plan or SSO Yes Yes No
Connects to other apps Yes Yes Yes
Open source or self-hosted No No No
AI abilities
Works with your files– Yes Yes
Understands images No– Yes
Makes images No No No
Makes video No No No
Writes code No No Yes
Runs agents or automations No Yes No
Learns your brand or style No No–
Works in many languages–– Yes
Capabilities score5/ 177/ 179/ 17

Pricing

Plans as listed on each vendor's site when we last checked. Confirm before you buy.

AttributeConsensusElicitKagi
Plans

Free

Free

Occasional fact-checking.

Basic

Free

Searching and reading a few papers.

Trial

Free

Seeing the difference.

ProOur pick

$20/mo, or $12/mo billed yearly

Anyone who checks evidence weekly.

ProOur pick

$49/user/mo billed yearly

Anyone doing a real literature review.

Starter

$5/mo

Light searchers.

Deep

$65/mo, or $45/mo billed yearly

Researchers and clinicians doing frequent literature reviews.

Scale

$169/user/mo billed yearly

Teams running many reviews at once.

ProfessionalOur pick

$10/mo

Anyone who searches every day.

Teams

Custom

Labs, departments and research groups.

Enterprise

Custom

Universities, pharma and large research groups.

Ultimate

$25/mo

Heavy AI users.

Duo and Family

Duo $14/mo, Family $20/mo

Couples and households.

Which plan to pickStart on Free. If you find yourself rationing the 10 Pro messages, Pro billed yearly is good value at $12 a month. Deep is only for people whose job is literature reviews; most readers here will never need it.Stay on Basic unless you have a review to run. When you do, Pro has everything one person needs, and the yearly commitment is the only way to get the quoted price. Scale is for teams, not for a solo researcher who wants more headroom.Use the free trial for a week, then take Professional. 300 searches on Starter goes in a couple of weeks for most people. Only pay for Ultimate if you'd otherwise pay for an AI chat subscription, since it bundles the top models. Yearly billing saves 10%.

Key features

AttributeConsensusElicitKagi
Standout features
  • Consensus Meter
  • Pro messages
  • Deep reviews
  • Study Snapshots
  • Quality filters
  • API and MCP
  • Research Reports
  • Extraction tables
  • Systematic Review workflow
  • Chat with papers
  • Routines
  • Library and sharing
  • Ad-free results
  • Personalised ranking
  • Lenses
  • Kagi Assistant
  • Summaries
  • API and MCP

Pros and cons

AttributeConsensusElicitKagi
Pros
  • Consensus Meter gives an honest read on mixed evidence in seconds
  • Every summary links to the actual paper
  • Free plan is enough for occasional checks
  • Pro is cheap when billed yearly
  • Quality filters help you ignore weak studies
  • Extraction tables save days on a literature review
  • Every answer links back to the passage in the paper
  • Systematic review workflow records why papers were included or excluded
  • Routines keep a review current without you remembering to check
  • Free plan is useful for reading and summarising
  • No ads, sponsored results or tracking
  • You control which sites show up and where
  • AI assistant with a choice of top models
  • Fair pricing: unused months are credited back
Cons
  • Only covers academic research; no business or news sources
  • Can make thin or old evidence look more settled than it is
  • Monthly billing on Pro is nearly double the yearly rate
  • Deep review limits are low until you pay for the Deep plan
  • $49 a user a month is a lot for anyone outside research
  • Only academic papers; no business, news or grey literature (reports published outside journals)
  • Extractions still need spot-checking against the source
  • Reports and large screens take a while to run
  • Collaboration is locked to the $169 Scale plan
  • It costs money, and Starter's 300 searches run out fast
  • Top AI models only on the $25 Ultimate plan
  • Local results like maps and shops are weaker than Google's
  • API and MCP use is billed separately from the search plans

Who each one is for

AttributeConsensusElicitKagi
Best for
  • Fact-checking health claims
  • Finding studies on a topic
  • Evidence for a blog or pitch
  • Student literature reviews
  • Literature reviews
  • Extracting data from papers
  • Screening papers by criteria
  • Comparing studies in a table
  • Everyday search without ads or tracking
  • Research where you want trustworthy sources
  • Hiding spammy or low-quality sites for good
  • Trying several AI models in one assistant
You'll find it used by
  • Health and wellness brands
  • Content marketers
  • Students
  • Clinicians
  • Researchers
  • Analysts
  • Clinicians
  • Postgraduate students
  • Researchers
  • Developers
  • Writers
  • Privacy-minded professionals

Questions people ask

Which is better, Consensus, Elicit or Kagi?

They tie on our overall rating (Consensus 4.3/5, Elicit 3.8/5 and Kagi 4.3/5). Consensus is best for fact-checking health claims and finding studies on a topic. Elicit is best for literature reviews and extracting data from papers. Kagi is best for everyday search without ads or tracking and research where you want trustworthy sources.

Which is cheaper, Consensus, Elicit or Kagi?

Consensus: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at $20/mo. Elicit: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at $49/user/mo. Kagi: There's no free plan. Paid plans start at $5/mo.

How we compare

Ratings are our own, from using each tool, across ease of use, features, output quality, value for money, speed & reliability.

Swap in another tool

More tools from Research & Search in the library.