Side-by-side comparison · Research & Search
Consensus vs Elicit vs Wokelo
Everything that matters when choosing between them, in one place: our rating, what each can do, what they cost, and the trade-offs.
Comparing 3 tools, the maximum.
At a glance
Pick it if: Anyone who wants to know whether something is backed by actual studies before repeating it.
Pick it if: Researchers, students and analysts who need to review a lot of papers carefully.
Pick it if: Private equity, venture, investment banking, consulting and corporate development teams that research companies and markets every week.
Overview
| Attribute | Consensus | Elicit | Wokelo |
|---|---|---|---|
| In one line | Searches academic papers and tells you what the evidence actually says. | Finds, screens and summarises research papers into a comparison table. | AI research agents that write company, market and due diligence reports for dealmakers. |
| Pricing model | Freemium | Freemium | Paid |
| Starting price | $20/mo | $49/user/mo | See website |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes | No |
| Works with Claude Code | No | No | Yes |
Rating breakdown
Our scores out of 5. The higher bar in each row is highlighted.
| Attribute | Consensus | Elicit | Wokelo |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.3Winner | 3.8 | 3.8 |
| Ease of useHow quickly someone non-technical gets value from it. | 4.5 | 3.5 | 4.0 |
| FeaturesHow completely it covers its own job, and how well the pieces fit together. | 4.5 | 4.5 | 4.0 |
| Output qualityHow good the results are before you fix them. | 4.0 | 4.5 | 4.0 |
| Value for moneyWhat you get for the price, including the free plan. | 4.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| Speed & reliabilityHow fast it is and how often it falls over. | 4.5 | 3.5 | 4.0 |
Feature comparison
A tick means it does this today. A dash means we haven't checked.
| Attribute | Consensus | Elicit | Wokelo |
|---|---|---|---|
| Access & platform | |||
| Free plan | Yes | Yes | No |
| Mobile app | – | No | – |
| Desktop app | No | No | – |
| Browser extension | – | No | – |
| API access | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Teams & business | |||
| Team workspace | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Enterprise plan or SSO | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Connects to other apps | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Open source or self-hosted | No | No | No |
| AI abilities | |||
| Works with your files | – | Yes | Yes |
| Understands images | No | – | – |
| Makes images | No | No | No |
| Makes video | No | No | No |
| Writes code | No | No | No |
| Runs agents or automations | No | Yes | Yes |
| Learns your brand or style | No | No | – |
| Works in many languages | – | – | – |
| Capabilities score | 5/ 17 | 7/ 17 | 6/ 17 |
Pricing
Plans as listed on each vendor's site when we last checked. Confirm before you buy.
| Attribute | Consensus | Elicit | Wokelo |
|---|---|---|---|
| Plans | Free Free Occasional fact-checking. | Basic Free Searching and reading a few papers. | EnterpriseOur pick Custom Investment, consulting and corporate strategy teams. |
ProOur pick $20/mo, or $12/mo billed yearly Anyone who checks evidence weekly. | ProOur pick $49/user/mo billed yearly Anyone doing a real literature review. | ||
Deep $65/mo, or $45/mo billed yearly Researchers and clinicians doing frequent literature reviews. | Scale $169/user/mo billed yearly Teams running many reviews at once. | ||
Teams Custom Labs, departments and research groups. | Enterprise Custom Universities, pharma and large research groups. | ||
| Which plan to pick | Start on Free. If you find yourself rationing the 10 Pro messages, Pro billed yearly is good value at $12 a month. Deep is only for people whose job is literature reviews; most readers here will never need it. | Stay on Basic unless you have a review to run. When you do, Pro has everything one person needs, and the yearly commitment is the only way to get the quoted price. Scale is for teams, not for a solo researcher who wants more headroom. | There is only a sales-led contract. Ask for a trial on a live deal or project before you sign, and check which premium data sources are included at your price. |
Key features
| Attribute | Consensus | Elicit | Wokelo |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standout features |
|
|
|
Pros and cons
| Attribute | Consensus | Elicit | Wokelo |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pros |
|
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
|
Who each one is for
| Attribute | Consensus | Elicit | Wokelo |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best for |
|
|
|
| You'll find it used by |
|
|
|
Questions people ask
Which is better, Consensus, Elicit or Wokelo?
Consensus scores highest overall in our ratings (Consensus 4.3/5, Elicit 3.8/5 and Wokelo 3.8/5). Consensus is best for fact-checking health claims and finding studies on a topic. Elicit is best for literature reviews and extracting data from papers. Wokelo is best for first-pass due diligence on a target and industry and market landscapes.
Which is cheaper, Consensus, Elicit or Wokelo?
Consensus: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at $20/mo. Elicit: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at $49/user/mo. Wokelo: Pricing isn't published; check the vendor's site for a quote.
Which is easier to use, Consensus, Elicit or Wokelo?
Consensus rates highest for ease of use in our scores. Anyone who wants to know whether something is backed by actual studies before repeating it.
How we compare
Ratings are our own, from using each tool, across ease of use, features, output quality, value for money, speed & reliability.
Swap in another tool
More tools from Research & Search in the library.
