Skip to content

Side-by-side comparison · Automation & Workflows

Composio vs Make vs Zapier

Everything that matters when choosing between them, in one place: our rating, what each can do, what they cost, and the trade-offs.

Composio

4.2

From $29/mo

Best overall

Make

4.3

From From $9/mo

Zapier

4.2

From From $19.99/mo

Comparing 3 tools, the maximum.

At a glance

Pick it if: People who already use Claude or ChatGPT every day and want it to act in their business apps, plus developers building agents that need app access.

Make4.3
Best overall

Pick it if: Marketers and operators who've outgrown simple automations and want to see what their workflows are doing.

Easiest to use

Pick it if: Anyone who's sick of copying data between apps and has never written a line of code.

Overview

AttributeComposioMakeZapier
In one linePlug Claude or ChatGPT into 1,500+ apps so it can send the email, not just draft it.Draw automations as a flowchart, with branches and loops, for less than Zapier charges.When something happens in one app, Zapier does the next step in another. No code needed.
Pricing modelFreemiumFreemiumFreemium
Starting price$29/moFrom $9/moFrom $19.99/mo
Free plan Yes Yes Yes
Works with Claude Code Yes Yes Yes

Rating breakdown

Our scores out of 5. The higher bar in each row is highlighted.

AttributeComposioMakeZapier
Overall rating4.24.3Winner4.2
Ease of useHow quickly someone non-technical gets value from it.
4.0
4.0
5.0
FeaturesHow completely it covers its own job, and how well the pieces fit together.
4.5
4.5
4.5
Output qualityHow good the results are before you fix them.
4.0
4.5
4.0
Value for moneyWhat you get for the price, including the free plan.
4.5
4.5
3.0
Speed & reliabilityHow fast it is and how often it falls over.
4.0
4.0
4.5

Feature comparison

A tick means it does this today. A dash means we haven't checked.

AttributeComposioMakeZapier
Access & platform
Free plan Yes Yes Yes
Mobile app No––
Desktop app No No No
Browser extension No Yes Yes
API access Yes Yes Yes
Teams & business
Team workspace Yes Yes Yes
Enterprise plan or SSO Yes Yes Yes
Connects to other apps Yes Yes Yes
Open source or self-hosted No No No
AI abilities
Works with your files No Yes Yes
Understands images–––
Makes images No No No
Makes video No No No
Writes code No No Yes
Runs agents or automations Yes Yes Yes
Learns your brand or style No No No
Works in many languages No Yes–
Capabilities score6/ 179/ 179/ 17

Pricing

Plans as listed on each vendor's site when we last checked. Confirm before you buy.

AttributeComposioMakeZapier
Plans

HobbyOur pick

Free

Individuals connecting their own assistant to their own apps.

Free

Free

Learning the canvas and running a couple of light scenarios.

Free

Free

Testing one or two simple automations.

Pro

$29/mo

Teams, or products with real users calling tools.

CoreOur pick

From $9/mo billed yearly

One person automating a small business.

ProfessionalOur pick

From $19.99/mo billed yearly, or $29.99/mo

One person running real automations for a business.

Enterprise

Custom

Companies with security reviews and high volume.

Pro

From $16/mo billed yearly

Anyone whose automations have become business-critical.

Team

From $69/mo billed yearly, or $103.50/mo

A team that shares Zaps and app connections.

Teams

From $29/mo billed yearly

A team sharing scenarios and connections.

Enterprise

Custom

Large companies with security and compliance needs.

Enterprise

Custom

Companies that need SSO, audit logs and an uptime guarantee.

Which plan to pickIf you are connecting your own Claude or ChatGPT to your own apps, Hobby is all you need. Move to Pro when a team or a product of yours starts using it, so usage keeps running past the free cap instead of pausing until next month.Core is enough for most small businesses, and 10,000 credits goes a long way when routers and error handlers are free. Move to Pro if a failed run costs you money and you want priority execution and better logs.Start on Free to confirm your apps connect, then move to Professional on yearly billing. Buy the smallest task tier and let Zapier tell you when you are close to the limit, because it is easy to overestimate how many tasks you need.

Key features

AttributeComposioMakeZapier
Standout features
  • 1,500+ app toolkits
  • Works inside your assistant
  • Managed sign-ins
  • Triggers
  • Custom tools and MCP servers
  • Developer platform
  • Visual canvas
  • Routers, filters and iterators
  • Run history you can replay
  • AI Agents
  • Make Grid
  • HTTP and webhooks
  • 8,000+ app connections
  • Copilot builder
  • Multi-step Zaps with paths
  • Tables, Interfaces and Chatbots
  • Agents
  • Zap history and replay

Pros and cons

AttributeComposioMakeZapier
Pros
  • One connection covers more than 1,500 apps
  • Very generous free plan
  • Works with Claude, ChatGPT, Claude Code and Cursor
  • Handles app logins and token refresh for you
  • Usage pricing is cheap compared with per-task tools
  • Much cheaper per step than Zapier
  • Branching, loops and filters are built in, not bolted on
  • Run history shows exactly what happened at every step
  • Routers and error handlers do not use credits
  • Generous free plan for learning
  • Fastest to learn of any automation tool here
  • Connects to far more apps than anyone else
  • Copilot builds a working Zap from a plain-English description
  • Reliable, with clear run history when something fails
  • Tables, Interfaces and Chatbots cover simple internal tools
Cons
  • Built for developers first, so the dashboard has jargon
  • Not a workflow builder: no canvas or scheduled runs
  • Some actions in less popular apps are thin
  • Extras like web search and transcription are billed per call
  • Steeper learning curve than Zapier, especially around data mapping
  • Credit usage is hard to predict until you have run a scenario for a while
  • Fewer apps than Zapier, and some apps have thin coverage
  • Pricing page is hard to read, and the headline prices assume yearly billing
  • Per-task pricing gets expensive fast, and every step counts as a task
  • The free plan is too limited to run anything real
  • Zaps run in a straight line, so branching and loops are clumsier than in Make
  • Each extra product (Tables, Interfaces, Chatbots) has its own limits and costs

Who each one is for

AttributeComposioMakeZapier
Best for
  • Letting Claude act in Gmail, Slack and your CRM
  • One connector instead of dozens of MCP servers
  • Giving custom AI agents access to users' apps
  • Covering apps with no official connector
  • Multi-step marketing workflows
  • Branching logic and filters
  • Processing batches of records
  • Automation on a budget
  • Sending form submissions to spreadsheets
  • New lead alerts in Slack or email
  • Syncing contacts between tools
  • Connecting niche apps nobody else supports
You'll find it used by
  • Founders
  • Ops teams
  • Developers
  • AI power users
  • Marketers
  • Ops teams
  • Agencies
  • Consultants
  • Marketers
  • Solo founders
  • Ops teams
  • Agencies

Questions people ask

Which is better, Composio, Make or Zapier?

Make scores highest overall in our ratings (Composio 4.2/5, Make 4.3/5 and Zapier 4.2/5). Composio is best for Letting Claude act in Gmail, Slack and your CRM and one connector instead of dozens of MCP servers. Make is best for multi-step marketing workflows and branching logic and filters. Zapier is best for sending form submissions to spreadsheets and new lead alerts in Slack or email.

Which is cheaper, Composio, Make or Zapier?

Composio: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at $29/mo. Make: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at From $9/mo. Zapier: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at From $19.99/mo.

Which is easier to use, Composio, Make or Zapier?

Zapier rates highest for ease of use in our scores. Anyone who's sick of copying data between apps and has never written a line of code.

How we compare

Ratings are our own, from using each tool, across ease of use, features, output quality, value for money, speed & reliability.

Swap in another tool

More tools from Automation & Workflows in the library.