Skip to content

Side-by-side comparison · Automation & Workflows

Composio vs Make vs Parseur

Everything that matters when choosing between them, in one place: our rating, what each can do, what they cost, and the trade-offs.

Composio

4.2

From $29/mo

Best overall

Make

4.3

From From $9/mo

Parseur

4.1

From $49/mo

Comparing 3 tools, the maximum.

At a glance

Pick it if: People who already use Claude or ChatGPT every day and want it to act in their business apps, plus developers building agents that need app access.

Make4.3
Best overall

Pick it if: Marketers and operators who've outgrown simple automations and want to see what their workflows are doing.

Easiest to use

Pick it if: Small businesses and operations teams that copy details from the same kinds of email or PDF into spreadsheets or other apps.

Overview

AttributeComposioMakeParseur
In one linePlug Claude or ChatGPT into 1,500+ apps so it can send the email, not just draft it.Draw automations as a flowchart, with branches and loops, for less than Zapier charges.Pulls data out of emails and PDFs into your spreadsheets and apps.
Pricing modelFreemiumFreemiumFreemium
Starting price$29/moFrom $9/mo$49/mo
Free plan Yes Yes Yes
Works with Claude Code Yes Yes Yes

Rating breakdown

Our scores out of 5. The higher bar in each row is highlighted.

AttributeComposioMakeParseur
Overall rating4.24.3Winner4.1
Ease of useHow quickly someone non-technical gets value from it.
4.0
4.0
4.5
FeaturesHow completely it covers its own job, and how well the pieces fit together.
4.5
4.5
4.0
Output qualityHow good the results are before you fix them.
4.0
4.5
4.0
Value for moneyWhat you get for the price, including the free plan.
4.5
4.5
3.5
Speed & reliabilityHow fast it is and how often it falls over.
4.0
4.0
4.5

Feature comparison

A tick means it does this today. A dash means we haven't checked.

AttributeComposioMakeParseur
Access & platform
Free plan Yes Yes Yes
Mobile app No––
Desktop app No No–
Browser extension No Yes–
API access Yes Yes Yes
Teams & business
Team workspace Yes Yes Yes
Enterprise plan or SSO Yes Yes Yes
Connects to other apps Yes Yes Yes
Open source or self-hosted No No–
AI abilities
Works with your files No Yes Yes
Understands images–––
Makes images No No No
Makes video No No No
Writes code No No No
Runs agents or automations Yes Yes No
Learns your brand or style No No–
Works in many languages No Yes Yes
Capabilities score6/ 179/ 177/ 17

Pricing

Plans as listed on each vendor's site when we last checked. Confirm before you buy.

AttributeComposioMakeParseur
Plans

HobbyOur pick

Free

Individuals connecting their own assistant to their own apps.

Free

Free

Learning the canvas and running a couple of light scenarios.

Free

Free

Trying it on a handful of documents.

Pro

$29/mo

Teams, or products with real users calling tools.

CoreOur pick

From $9/mo billed yearly

One person automating a small business.

Micro

$49/mo, or $468/yr

A small business with a trickle of documents.

Enterprise

Custom

Companies with security reviews and high volume.

Pro

From $16/mo billed yearly

Anyone whose automations have become business-critical.

StarterOur pick

$129/mo, or $1,188/yr

Teams processing a few dozen documents a day.

Teams

From $29/mo billed yearly

A team sharing scenarios and connections.

Pro

$499/mo, or $4,788/yr

Operations teams with high volume.

Enterprise

Custom

Companies that need SSO, audit logs and an uptime guarantee.

Enterprise

Custom

Very high volume or custom contract terms.

Which plan to pickIf you are connecting your own Claude or ChatGPT to your own apps, Hobby is all you need. Move to Pro when a team or a product of yours starts using it, so usage keeps running past the free cap instead of pausing until next month.Core is enough for most small businesses, and 10,000 credits goes a long way when routers and error handlers are free. Move to Pro if a failed run costs you money and you want priority execution and better logs.Use Free to prove it can read your documents, then pick the plan that matches your monthly page count. Starter is where the cost per page becomes reasonable; yearly billing knocks roughly a quarter off.

Key features

AttributeComposioMakeParseur
Standout features
  • 1,500+ app toolkits
  • Works inside your assistant
  • Managed sign-ins
  • Triggers
  • Custom tools and MCP servers
  • Developer platform
  • Visual canvas
  • Routers, filters and iterators
  • Run history you can replay
  • AI Agents
  • Make Grid
  • HTTP and webhooks
  • AI parsing
  • Template mode
  • Mailbox per job
  • Exports everywhere
  • Post-processing

Pros and cons

AttributeComposioMakeParseur
Pros
  • One connection covers more than 1,500 apps
  • Very generous free plan
  • Works with Claude, ChatGPT, Claude Code and Cursor
  • Handles app logins and token refresh for you
  • Usage pricing is cheap compared with per-task tools
  • Much cheaper per step than Zapier
  • Branching, loops and filters are built in, not bolted on
  • Run history shows exactly what happened at every step
  • Routers and error handlers do not use credits
  • Generous free plan for learning
  • Quick to set up: forward an email and name the fields
  • Handles varying layouts without building templates
  • API, webhooks and automation connections on every plan
  • Support is consistently praised in reviews
  • Yearly billing brings the price down noticeably
Cons
  • Built for developers first, so the dashboard has jargon
  • Not a workflow builder: no canvas or scheduled runs
  • Some actions in less popular apps are thin
  • Extras like web search and transcription are billed per call
  • Steeper learning curve than Zapier, especially around data mapping
  • Credit usage is hard to predict until you have run a scenario for a while
  • Fewer apps than Zapier, and some apps have thin coverage
  • Pricing page is hard to read, and the headline prices assume yearly billing
  • Free plan is only 20 pages a month, short for a proper test
  • Expensive per page at low volumes
  • Advanced features are thinly documented
  • Not built for approval workflows or direct ERP posting

Who each one is for

AttributeComposioMakeParseur
Best for
  • Letting Claude act in Gmail, Slack and your CRM
  • One connector instead of dozens of MCP servers
  • Giving custom AI agents access to users' apps
  • Covering apps with no official connector
  • Multi-step marketing workflows
  • Branching logic and filters
  • Processing batches of records
  • Automation on a budget
  • Order and booking emails into a spreadsheet
  • Lead notification emails into a CRM
  • Supplier invoices and delivery notes
  • Recurring PDF reports
  • Feeding Zapier and Make workflows
You'll find it used by
  • Founders
  • Ops teams
  • Developers
  • AI power users
  • Marketers
  • Ops teams
  • Agencies
  • Consultants
  • Small business owners
  • Operations teams
  • E-commerce stores
  • Property and travel businesses
  • Bookkeepers

Questions people ask

Which is better, Composio, Make or Parseur?

Make scores highest overall in our ratings (Composio 4.2/5, Make 4.3/5 and Parseur 4.1/5). Composio is best for Letting Claude act in Gmail, Slack and your CRM and one connector instead of dozens of MCP servers. Make is best for multi-step marketing workflows and branching logic and filters. Parseur is best for order and booking emails into a spreadsheet and lead notification emails into a CRM.

Which is cheaper, Composio, Make or Parseur?

Composio: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at $29/mo. Make: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at From $9/mo. Parseur: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at $49/mo.

Which is easier to use, Composio, Make or Parseur?

Parseur rates highest for ease of use in our scores. Small businesses and operations teams that copy details from the same kinds of email or PDF into spreadsheets or other apps.

How we compare

Ratings are our own, from using each tool, across ease of use, features, output quality, value for money, speed & reliability.

Swap in another tool

More tools from Automation & Workflows in the library.