Side-by-side comparison · Coding & Dev Tools
Amp vs Cursor vs Warp
Everything that matters when choosing between them, in one place: our rating, what each can do, what they cost, and the trade-offs.
Comparing 3 tools, the maximum.
At a glance
Pick it if: Developers and engineering teams working on large codebases who want agents running in the background, not tied to their laptop.
Pick it if: Developers and curious beginners who want AI help but still want a visual editor.
Pick it if: Anyone who has to use the terminal but never wanted to learn it.
Overview
| Attribute | Amp | Cursor | Warp |
|---|---|---|---|
| In one line | A coding agent that keeps working on remote machines after you close your laptop. | A code editor with AI built in, for people who want to watch every change happen. | A modern terminal where you can type what you want in normal words instead of commands. |
| Pricing model | Freemium | Freemium | Freemium |
| Starting price | $20/mo | $8/mo | $20/mo |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Works with Claude Code | Yes | No | No |
Rating breakdown
Our scores out of 5. The higher bar in each row is highlighted.
| Attribute | Amp | Cursor | Warp |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.0 | 3.9 | 4.1Winner |
| Ease of useHow quickly someone non-technical gets value from it. | 3.0 | 4.0 | 4.5 |
| FeaturesHow completely it covers its own job, and how well the pieces fit together. | 4.5 | 4.5 | 4.0 |
| Output qualityHow good the results are before you fix them. | 4.5 | 4.0 | 3.5 |
| Value for moneyWhat you get for the price, including the free plan. | 4.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 |
| Speed & reliabilityHow fast it is and how often it falls over. | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.5 |
Feature comparison
A tick means it does this today. A dash means we haven't checked.
| Attribute | Amp | Cursor | Warp |
|---|---|---|---|
| Access & platform | |||
| Free plan | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile app | Yes | Yes | No |
| Desktop app | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Browser extension | No | No | No |
| API access | Yes | – | – |
| Teams & business | |||
| Team workspace | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Enterprise plan or SSO | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Connects to other apps | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Open source or self-hosted | Yes | No | No |
| AI abilities | |||
| Works with your files | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Understands images | Yes | Yes | – |
| Makes images | No | No | No |
| Makes video | No | No | No |
| Writes code | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Runs agents or automations | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Learns your brand or style | – | Yes | Yes |
| Works in many languages | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Capabilities score | 13/ 17 | 12/ 17 | 10/ 17 |
Pricing
Plans as listed on each vendor's site when we last checked. Confirm before you buy.
| Attribute | Amp | Cursor | Warp |
|---|---|---|---|
| Plans | HobbyOur pick Free Developers with their own model subscription or keys. | Free Free Trying the editor and a few agent runs. | FreeOur pick Free Everyone who just wants a better terminal. |
Megawatt $20/mo Individuals who want Amp to host the machines. | Plus $8/mo Light users who are happy with Grok models only. | Build $20/mo, or $18/mo billed yearly People who lean on the Warp agent daily. | |
Gigawatt $200/mo Heavy users running many big jobs. | PremiumOur pick $30/mo Most developers, especially if you want Claude alongside Grok. | Max $200/mo, or $180/mo billed yearly Heavy agent users. | |
Enterprise Custom Large companies with security and compliance needs. | Super or Ultra $100/mo or $200/mo Heavy daily agent users. | Business $50/user/mo, or $45/user/mo billed yearly Teams that need SSO and usage metrics. | |
Legacy Pro $20/mo Existing subscribers only. New customers can't buy it. | Enterprise Custom Large organisations. | ||
Teams From $30/user/mo Companies that need admin controls and SSO. | |||
| Which plan to pick | Start on Hobby and link a ChatGPT or Claude subscription you already pay for. Move to Megawatt at $20 a month only when you want Amp to host the machines so tasks run while you're away. Teams can create a workspace at no extra charge. | If you are on the old $20 Pro plan and it covers what you use, stay put; switching is permanent. New customers should skip Plus unless they are happy with Grok. Premium is the realistic starting point if you want Claude, and budget for the extra usage billing on top of the $30. Large companies can ask about a custom Enterprise plan. | Stay on Free. The terminal is the product, and you can run Claude Code inside it on your Claude subscription without paying Warp anything. Only buy Build if you find yourself using Warp's own agent more than Claude Code. |
Key features
| Attribute | Amp | Cursor | Warp |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standout features |
|
|
|
Pros and cons
| Attribute | Amp | Cursor | Warp |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pros |
|
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
|
Who each one is for
| Attribute | Amp | Cursor | Warp |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best for |
|
|
|
| You'll find it used by |
|
|
|
Questions people ask
Which is better, Amp, Cursor or Warp?
Warp scores highest overall in our ratings (Amp 4.0/5, Cursor 3.9/5 and Warp 4.1/5). Amp is best for running several coding tasks in the background at once and working on big, messy codebases. Cursor is best for editing with AI autocomplete and learning by watching changes happen. Warp is best for A nicer home for Claude Code and commands in normal words.
Which is cheaper, Amp, Cursor or Warp?
Amp: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at $20/mo. Cursor: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at $8/mo. Warp: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at $20/mo.
Which is easier to use, Amp, Cursor or Warp?
Warp rates highest for ease of use in our scores. Anyone who has to use the terminal but never wanted to learn it.
How we compare
Ratings are our own, from using each tool, across ease of use, features, output quality, value for money, speed & reliability.
Swap in another tool
More tools from Coding & Dev Tools in the library.
