Skip to content

Side-by-side comparison ยท Coding & Dev Tools

Amp vs Cursor vs Zed

Everything that matters when choosing between them, in one place: our rating, what each can do, what they cost, and the trade-offs.

Amp

4.0

From $20/mo

Cursor

3.9

From $8/mo

Best overall

Zed

4.3

From $10/mo

Comparing 3 tools, the maximum.

At a glance

Amp4.0

Pick it if: Developers and engineering teams working on large codebases who want agents running in the background, not tied to their laptop.

Easiest to use

Pick it if: Developers and curious beginners who want AI help but still want a visual editor.

Zed4.3
Best overallBest value

Pick it if: Developers who want a fast editor and already pay for Claude or another AI provider.

Overview

AttributeAmpCursorZed
In one lineA coding agent that keeps working on remote machines after you close your laptop.A code editor with AI built in, for people who want to watch every change happen.A fast, free, open-source code editor that runs Claude Code and other AI agents inside it.
Pricing modelFreemiumFreemiumFreemium
Starting price$20/mo$8/mo$10/mo
Free plan Yes Yes Yes
Works with Claude Code Yes No Yes

Rating breakdown

Our scores out of 5. The higher bar in each row is highlighted.

AttributeAmpCursorZed
Overall rating4.03.94.3Winner
Ease of useHow quickly someone non-technical gets value from it.
3.0
4.0
3.5
FeaturesHow completely it covers its own job, and how well the pieces fit together.
4.5
4.5
4.0
Output qualityHow good the results are before you fix them.
4.5
4.0
4.0
Value for moneyWhat you get for the price, including the free plan.
4.0
3.0
5.0
Speed & reliabilityHow fast it is and how often it falls over.
4.0
4.0
5.0

Feature comparison

A tick means it does this today. A dash means we haven't checked.

AttributeAmpCursorZed
Access & platform
Free plan Yes Yes Yes
Mobile app Yes Yes No
Desktop app Yes Yes Yes
Browser extension No No No
API access Yesโ€“โ€“
Teams & business
Team workspace Yes Yes Yes
Enterprise plan or SSO Yes Yes No
Connects to other apps Yes Yes Yes
Open source or self-hosted Yes No Yes
AI abilities
Works with your files Yes Yes Yes
Understands images Yes Yes Yes
Makes images No No No
Makes video No No No
Writes code Yes Yes Yes
Runs agents or automations Yes Yes Yes
Learns your brand or styleโ€“ Yes Yes
Works in many languages Yes Yes Yes
Capabilities score13/ 1712/ 1711/ 17

Pricing

Plans as listed on each vendor's site when we last checked. Confirm before you buy.

AttributeAmpCursorZed
Plans

HobbyOur pick

Free

Developers with their own model subscription or keys.

Free

Free

Trying the editor and a few agent runs.

PersonalOur pick

Free

Almost everyone.

Megawatt

$20/mo

Individuals who want Amp to host the machines.

Plus

$8/mo

Light users who are happy with Grok models only.

Pro

$10/mo

People who want Zed's hosted AI without managing keys.

Gigawatt

$200/mo

Heavy users running many big jobs.

PremiumOur pick

$30/mo

Most developers, especially if you want Claude alongside Grok.

Business

$30/seat/mo

Teams that need spending and access controls.

Enterprise

Custom

Large companies with security and compliance needs.

Super or Ultra

$100/mo or $200/mo

Heavy daily agent users.

Legacy Pro

$20/mo

Existing subscribers only. New customers can't buy it.

Teams

From $30/user/mo

Companies that need admin controls and SSO.

Which plan to pickStart on Hobby and link a ChatGPT or Claude subscription you already pay for. Move to Megawatt at $20 a month only when you want Amp to host the machines so tasks run while you're away. Teams can create a workspace at no extra charge.If you are on the old $20 Pro plan and it covers what you use, stay put; switching is permanent. New customers should skip Plus unless they are happy with Grok. Premium is the realistic starting point if you want Claude, and budget for the extra usage billing on top of the $30. Large companies can ask about a custom Enterprise plan.Personal. If you have Claude Pro, run Claude Code inside Zed and you are done. Pro only makes sense if you want Zed's built-in assistant and edit predictions without setting up API keys.

Key features

AttributeAmpCursorZed
Standout features
  • Orbs
  • Bring your own model
  • Portals
  • Multiplayer threads
  • Subagents and code review
  • Start from anywhere
  • Tab autocomplete
  • Agent mode
  • Chat with your codebase
  • Cloud agents and automations
  • Rules
  • Built on VS Code
  • Built for speed
  • External agents inside the editor
  • Bring your own keys
  • Edit predictions
  • Real-time collaboration
  • Open source

Pros and cons

AttributeAmpCursorZed
Pros
  • Free when you bring your own model access and machines
  • Background tasks keep running when your laptop is closed
  • Strong reputation on large codebases
  • Sharing, multiplayer and live previews make team review easy
  • Can use your existing ChatGPT or Claude subscription
  • The clearest view of what an AI is doing to your code
  • Autocomplete is still the best in the category
  • Feels familiar instantly if you have used VS Code
  • Cloud agents and code review on the mid plans
  • Noticeably faster than VS Code and Cursor
  • Free, open source, and no charge for running your own agents
  • Clean agent panel that shows exactly what changed
  • Built-in real-time collaboration
Cons
  • Orbs, runners and model routing take time to understand
  • Built for developers, not beginners
  • Pricing has changed several times in 2026
  • Hosted orb time beyond your plan costs extra
  • Cheap plans only give you Grok models
  • Claude usage is billed on top of the subscription at API prices, so the real cost is hard to predict
  • OpenAI models are due to leave Cursor, which narrows the model choice
  • You now buy it bundled with Grok and X Premium, whether you want them or not
  • Agent runs are less thorough than Claude Code on big tasks
  • Smaller extension library than VS Code or Cursor
  • Less hand-holding for beginners; it assumes you know your way around an editor
  • Business plan has no single sign-on (SSO) yet, which rules it out for some companies
  • Its own hosted AI is basic compared with the agents you can bring

Who each one is for

AttributeAmpCursorZed
Best for
  • Running several coding tasks in the background at once
  • Working on big, messy codebases
  • Teams sharing and reviewing agent work together
  • Using a ChatGPT or Claude subscription in another agent
  • Editing with AI autocomplete
  • Learning by watching changes happen
  • Multi-file changes in agent mode
  • Developers who like VS Code
  • Running Claude Code inside an editor
  • Speed on big projects
  • Using your own AI subscription
  • Pairing with teammates in real time
You'll find it used by
  • Developers
  • Engineering teams
  • Startups
  • Large companies
  • Developers
  • Startup teams
  • Students
  • Technical founders
  • Developers
  • Claude Code users
  • Open source fans
  • Small teams

Questions people ask

Which is better, Amp, Cursor or Zed?

Zed scores highest overall in our ratings (Amp 4.0/5, Cursor 3.9/5 and Zed 4.3/5). Amp is best for running several coding tasks in the background at once and working on big, messy codebases. Cursor is best for editing with AI autocomplete and learning by watching changes happen. Zed is best for Running Claude Code inside an editor and speed on big projects.

Which is cheaper, Amp, Cursor or Zed?

Amp: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at $20/mo. Cursor: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at $8/mo. Zed: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at $10/mo.

Which is easier to use, Amp, Cursor or Zed?

Cursor rates highest for ease of use in our scores. Developers and curious beginners who want AI help but still want a visual editor.

How we compare

Ratings are our own, from using each tool, across ease of use, features, output quality, value for money, speed & reliability.

Swap in another tool

More tools from Coding & Dev Tools in the library.