Skip to content
Legal, Finance & HR

Harvey

AI platform for law firms and legal teams: research, drafting and document review.

3.8our rating
Paid

Quick take

  • The default AI platform at big law firms. It covers research, drafting, bulk document review and agent workflows in one place.
  • No public pricing. Reported deals run around US$1,000+ per lawyer per month, with seat minimums and yearly terms, so small firms are mostly priced out.
  • Vault, its bulk document review table, is the feature most users single out, especially for due diligence.
  • Critics call it a well-dressed layer over general AI models. Test it against Claude or ChatGPT on your own work before signing.
  • Answers still need checking by a lawyer, and quality is reported to drop on very long documents.

What is Harvey?

Harvey is an AI platform built for lawyers. You ask it legal questions, have it draft memos and clauses, and drop hundreds or thousands of documents into a Vault where it reviews them in a table, one question per column. It now also runs agents for multi-step matters, shared Spaces for working with clients and co-counsel, contract review, regulatory tracking and usage reporting for firm leaders. Big names use it, including A&O Shearman, Latham & Watkins, KKR and Bayer, and the company says more than 3,500 legal organisations are on it.

Pick Harvey if you run a large firm or legal department and want one tool across research, drafting and due diligence, with the security reviews and ethical walls that big clients ask for. CoCounsel is the better choice if your lawyers live in Westlaw and want answers grounded in its case law. Spellbook is far cheaper and simpler if the job is mostly drafting and redlining contracts in Word. Claude or ChatGPT on a business plan will cover a lot of basic legal drafting for a fraction of the price, without the legal-specific workflows.

The catch is price and access. Harvey publishes no prices, and widely reported figures sit around US$1,000 or more per lawyer per month with seat minimums and yearly contracts, so it is out of reach for most small firms. Some lawyers say it is a polished layer over general AI models, and quality can slip on very long documents. Every output still needs a lawyer to check it.

Who's using it, and who it's for

  • Large law firms
  • In-house legal teams
  • Private equity
  • Tax and advisory firms

Large law firms and corporate legal teams that want one AI platform across research, drafting and due diligence.

Key features

  • Assistant

    Ask legal questions, draft memos and clauses, and summarise documents in plain chat.

  • Vault

    Store large sets of documents and review them in a table, with one question per column and answers linked to the source.

  • Agents and workflows

    Multi-step jobs such as diligence reports or contract comparisons, routed to purpose-built agents.

  • Knowledge

    Research legal, regulatory and tax questions, with legal content partners such as LexisNexis available as add-ons.

  • Spaces

    Shared workspaces with clients and co-counsel, with ethical walls between matters.

  • Command Center

    Usage reports and benchmarks so firm leaders can see who uses it and for what.

How we rate it

3.8 / 5

Our rating

From using the tool ourselves. The average of the five scores.

Ease of use
4.0

How quickly someone non-technical gets value from it.

Features
4.5

How completely it covers its own job, and how well the pieces fit together.

Output quality
4.0

How good the results are before you fix them.

Value for money
2.5

What you get for the price, including the free plan.

Speed & reliability
4.0

How fast it is and how often it falls over.

Harvey pricing

  • Our pick

    Enterprise

    Custom

    Large firms and legal departments buying for many lawyers.

    • Assistant, Vault, Knowledge and agents
    • SSO, admin controls and ethical walls
    • Onboarding and training from Harvey's team

Which plan should you pick?

There is one route in: book a demo and get a quote. Ask for a pilot with a small group on real matters, and get the per-seat price, minimum seats and renewal terms in writing before you commit.

Prices in USD unless noted, checked 22 October 2026. Vendors change plans often, so confirm on their site before you buy.

Best use cases

Ways Harvey can slot into your week.

  1. 1

    Run due diligence faster

    Load a data room into Vault, ask the same questions of every contract (change of control, assignment, termination) and get a table you can check line by line.

  2. 2

    Draft a first-cut memo

    Give it the facts and question, get a structured draft, then have a lawyer check every authority it cites.

  3. 3

    Answer internal legal questions

    In-house teams use it to give business colleagues quick first answers on contracts and policy, with a lawyer signing off.

  4. 4

    Track regulatory change

    Set up horizon scanning so the team hears about rule changes that affect clients or the business.

How it fits your tech stack

It sits next to your document management system and Microsoft Word, with a connector library for pulling in files. Many firms still keep Westlaw or Lexis for primary research and use Harvey for drafting and document review.

Connects to

  • Microsoft Word
  • Microsoft Outlook
  • iManage
  • NetDocuments
  • SharePoint
  • LexisNexis

Pros and cons

Pros

  • One platform for research, drafting, bulk review and agents
  • Vault's table review is strong for diligence and contract sets
  • Enterprise security, ethical walls and admin reporting that big firms need
  • Used and tested by many of the world's largest firms
  • Ships new features quickly

Cons

  • No public pricing, and reported costs of around US$1,000+ per lawyer a month with seat minimums
  • Yearly contracts and onboarding fees put it out of reach for small firms
  • Critics say much of the value comes from the underlying general AI models
  • Quality reportedly drops on very long documents, and outputs still need full checking

Harvey alternatives

The closest alternatives to Harvey in the library, best rated first.

Why it made the list

It is the most widely adopted AI platform at big law firms, and the one other legal AI tools get measured against.

Harvey FAQ

How much does Harvey cost?

Pricing isn't published; check the vendor's site for a quote. Prices checked 22 October 2026 against Harvey's pricing page.

Is Harvey free?

No. Pricing isn't published; check the vendor's site for a quote.

What is Harvey best for?

Harvey is best for due diligence across large document sets, first drafts of memos, clauses and letters and legal and regulatory research questions. Large law firms and corporate legal teams that want one AI platform across research, drafting and due diligence.

What are the best Harvey alternatives?

The closest alternatives are DataSnipper, Paradox, Spellbook and Booke AI. DataSnipper is best for vouching and tick-and-tie in Excel.

More tools in Legal, Finance & HR

  • CoCounsel

    Legal, Finance & HR

    3.8

    Thomson Reuters' legal AI for research, drafting and document review, built on Westlaw.

    Paid
  • Spellbook

    Legal, Finance & HR

    3.9

    Drafts, reviews and redlines contracts inside Microsoft Word.

    Paid
  • Luminance

    Legal, Finance & HR

    3.7

    Contract review, negotiation and contract management for in-house legal teams.

    Paid
  • Claude

    AI Assistants & LLMs

    4.6

    Anthropic's chat assistant, at its best on careful writing and long documents.

    Freemium