Side-by-side comparison · Automation & Workflows
Make vs Parseur vs Relevance AI
Everything that matters when choosing between them, in one place: our rating, what each can do, what they cost, and the trade-offs.
Comparing 3 tools, the maximum.
At a glance
Pick it if: Marketers and operators who've outgrown simple automations and want to see what their workflows are doing.
Pick it if: Small businesses and operations teams that copy details from the same kinds of email or PDF into spreadsheets or other apps.
Pick it if: Sales and revenue operations teams at growing companies who want AI agents doing research, prep and admin.
Overview
| Attribute | Make | Parseur | Relevance AI |
|---|---|---|---|
| In one line | Draw automations as a flowchart, with branches and loops, for less than Zapier charges. | Pulls data out of emails and PDFs into your spreadsheets and apps. | Build a team of AI agents for sales, support and ops work, without writing code. |
| Pricing model | Freemium | Freemium | Paid |
| Starting price | From $9/mo | $49/mo | See website |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes | No |
| Works with Claude Code | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Rating breakdown
Our scores out of 5. The higher bar in each row is highlighted.
| Attribute | Make | Parseur | Relevance AI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.3Winner | 4.1 | 3.7 |
| Ease of useHow quickly someone non-technical gets value from it. | 4.0 | 4.5 | 3.5 |
| FeaturesHow completely it covers its own job, and how well the pieces fit together. | 4.5 | 4.0 | 4.5 |
| Output qualityHow good the results are before you fix them. | 4.5 | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| Value for moneyWhat you get for the price, including the free plan. | 4.5 | 3.5 | 3.0 |
| Speed & reliabilityHow fast it is and how often it falls over. | 4.0 | 4.5 | 3.5 |
Feature comparison
A tick means it does this today. A dash means we haven't checked.
| Attribute | Make | Parseur | Relevance AI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Access & platform | |||
| Free plan | Yes | Yes | No |
| Mobile app | – | – | – |
| Desktop app | No | – | – |
| Browser extension | Yes | – | – |
| API access | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Teams & business | |||
| Team workspace | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Enterprise plan or SSO | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Connects to other apps | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Open source or self-hosted | No | – | No |
| AI abilities | |||
| Works with your files | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Understands images | – | – | – |
| Makes images | No | No | No |
| Makes video | No | No | No |
| Writes code | No | No | – |
| Runs agents or automations | Yes | No | Yes |
| Learns your brand or style | No | – | – |
| Works in many languages | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Capabilities score | 9/ 17 | 7/ 17 | 7/ 17 |
Pricing
Plans as listed on each vendor's site when we last checked. Confirm before you buy.
| Attribute | Make | Parseur | Relevance AI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Plans | Free Free Learning the canvas and running a couple of light scenarios. | Free Free Trying it on a handful of documents. | EnterpriseOur pick Custom Teams rolling out agents across a department. |
CoreOur pick From $9/mo billed yearly One person automating a small business. | Micro $49/mo, or $468/yr A small business with a trickle of documents. | ||
Pro From $16/mo billed yearly Anyone whose automations have become business-critical. | StarterOur pick $129/mo, or $1,188/yr Teams processing a few dozen documents a day. | ||
Teams From $29/mo billed yearly A team sharing scenarios and connections. | Pro $499/mo, or $4,788/yr Operations teams with high volume. | ||
Enterprise Custom Companies that need SSO, audit logs and an uptime guarantee. | Enterprise Custom Very high volume or custom contract terms. | ||
| Which plan to pick | Core is enough for most small businesses, and 10,000 credits goes a long way when routers and error handlers are free. Move to Pro if a failed run costs you money and you want priority execution and better logs. | Use Free to prove it can read your documents, then pick the plan that matches your monthly page count. Starter is where the cost per page becomes reasonable; yearly billing knocks roughly a quarter off. | There is only one public option now: talk to sales for an Enterprise quote. Ask for a usage cap and clear reporting on credit spend in the contract. |
Key features
| Attribute | Make | Parseur | Relevance AI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standout features |
|
|
|
Pros and cons
| Attribute | Make | Parseur | Relevance AI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pros |
|
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
|
Who each one is for
| Attribute | Make | Parseur | Relevance AI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best for |
|
|
|
| You'll find it used by |
|
|
|
Questions people ask
Which is better, Make, Parseur or Relevance AI?
Make scores highest overall in our ratings (Make 4.3/5, Parseur 4.1/5 and Relevance AI 3.7/5). Make is best for multi-step marketing workflows and branching logic and filters. Parseur is best for order and booking emails into a spreadsheet and lead notification emails into a CRM. Relevance AI is best for sales research and meeting prep and post-call follow-ups and CRM updates.
Which is cheaper, Make, Parseur or Relevance AI?
Make: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at From $9/mo. Parseur: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at $49/mo. Relevance AI: Pricing isn't published; check the vendor's site for a quote.
Which is easier to use, Make, Parseur or Relevance AI?
Parseur rates highest for ease of use in our scores. Small businesses and operations teams that copy details from the same kinds of email or PDF into spreadsheets or other apps.
How we compare
Ratings are our own, from using each tool, across ease of use, features, output quality, value for money, speed & reliability.
Swap in another tool
More tools from Automation & Workflows in the library.
