Skip to content

Side-by-side comparison · Automation & Workflows

Activepieces vs Make vs Parseur

Everything that matters when choosing between them, in one place: our rating, what each can do, what they cost, and the trade-offs.

Activepieces

4.0

From $20/mo flat

Best overall

Make

4.3

From From $9/mo

Parseur

4.1

From $49/mo

Comparing 3 tools, the maximum.

At a glance

Pick it if: Small teams who like how Zapier works but want to own their automations or avoid per-task pricing.

Make4.3
Best overall

Pick it if: Marketers and operators who've outgrown simple automations and want to see what their workflows are doing.

Easiest to use

Pick it if: Small businesses and operations teams that copy details from the same kinds of email or PDF into spreadsheets or other apps.

Overview

AttributeActivepiecesMakeParseur
In one lineA Zapier-style automation builder that's open source and charges per run, not per step.Draw automations as a flowchart, with branches and loops, for less than Zapier charges.Pulls data out of emails and PDFs into your spreadsheets and apps.
Pricing modelOpen sourceFreemiumFreemium
Starting price$20/mo flatFrom $9/mo$49/mo
Free plan Yes Yes Yes
Works with Claude Code Yes Yes Yes

Rating breakdown

Our scores out of 5. The higher bar in each row is highlighted.

AttributeActivepiecesMakeParseur
Overall rating4.04.3Winner4.1
Ease of useHow quickly someone non-technical gets value from it.
4.0
4.0
4.5
FeaturesHow completely it covers its own job, and how well the pieces fit together.
3.5
4.5
4.0
Output qualityHow good the results are before you fix them.
4.0
4.5
4.0
Value for moneyWhat you get for the price, including the free plan.
4.5
4.5
3.5
Speed & reliabilityHow fast it is and how often it falls over.
4.0
4.0
4.5

Feature comparison

A tick means it does this today. A dash means we haven't checked.

AttributeActivepiecesMakeParseur
Access & platform
Free plan Yes Yes Yes
Mobile app No––
Desktop app No No–
Browser extension No Yes–
API access Yes Yes Yes
Teams & business
Team workspace Yes Yes Yes
Enterprise plan or SSO Yes Yes Yes
Connects to other apps Yes Yes Yes
Open source or self-hosted Yes No–
AI abilities
Works with your files Yes Yes Yes
Understands images–––
Makes images No No No
Makes video No No No
Writes code Yes No No
Runs agents or automations Yes Yes No
Learns your brand or style No No–
Works in many languages Yes Yes Yes
Capabilities score10/ 179/ 177/ 17

Pricing

Plans as listed on each vendor's site when we last checked. Confirm before you buy.

AttributeActivepiecesMakeParseur
Plans

Free

Free

Small teams getting started, or anyone who will self-host.

Free

Free

Learning the canvas and running a couple of light scenarios.

Free

Free

Trying it on a handful of documents.

PlusOur pick

$20/mo flat

A small business running automations every day.

CoreOur pick

From $9/mo billed yearly

One person automating a small business.

Micro

$49/mo, or $468/yr

A small business with a trickle of documents.

Team

$200/mo flat

A larger team that needs SSO and roles.

Pro

From $16/mo billed yearly

Anyone whose automations have become business-critical.

StarterOur pick

$129/mo, or $1,188/yr

Teams processing a few dozen documents a day.

Ultimate

Custom

Companies with heavy volume or strict security needs.

Teams

From $29/mo billed yearly

A team sharing scenarios and connections.

Pro

$499/mo, or $4,788/yr

Operations teams with high volume.

Enterprise

Custom

Companies that need SSO, audit logs and an uptime guarantee.

Enterprise

Custom

Very high volume or custom contract terms.

Which plan to pickThe Free plan is unusually generous, so start there. Move to Plus when you want monthly credits instead of a daily cap and the option to use your own AI keys. Self-host only if someone on the team is happy running a server.Core is enough for most small businesses, and 10,000 credits goes a long way when routers and error handlers are free. Move to Pro if a failed run costs you money and you want priority execution and better logs.Use Free to prove it can read your documents, then pick the plan that matches your monthly page count. Starter is where the cost per page becomes reasonable; yearly billing knocks roughly a quarter off.

Key features

AttributeActivepiecesMakeParseur
Standout features
  • Zapier-style builder
  • Flat per-run pricing
  • Self-host or cloud
  • MCP for AI assistants
  • Agents and Tables
  • Bring your own AI keys
  • Visual canvas
  • Routers, filters and iterators
  • Run history you can replay
  • AI Agents
  • Make Grid
  • HTTP and webhooks
  • AI parsing
  • Template mode
  • Mailbox per job
  • Exports everywhere
  • Post-processing

Pros and cons

AttributeActivepiecesMakeParseur
Pros
  • Easiest open-source automation tool to learn
  • Flat pricing, with one credit per run however long the flow
  • Generous free plan and free self-hosting
  • MCP makes every connected app available to Claude
  • Open source, so you can inspect or extend it
  • Much cheaper per step than Zapier
  • Branching, loops and filters are built in, not bolted on
  • Run history shows exactly what happened at every step
  • Routers and error handlers do not use credits
  • Generous free plan for learning
  • Quick to set up: forward an email and name the fields
  • Handles varying layouts without building templates
  • API, webhooks and automation connections on every plan
  • Support is consistently praised in reviews
  • Yearly billing brings the price down noticeably
Cons
  • Far fewer apps than Zapier, and some pieces are thin
  • Smaller community and fewer templates than n8n
  • No canvas, so complex branching is harder to follow
  • AI steps cost extra credits on top of the run
  • Steeper learning curve than Zapier, especially around data mapping
  • Credit usage is hard to predict until you have run a scenario for a while
  • Fewer apps than Zapier, and some apps have thin coverage
  • Pricing page is hard to read, and the headline prices assume yearly billing
  • Free plan is only 20 pages a month, short for a proper test
  • Expensive per page at low volumes
  • Advanced features are thinly documented
  • Not built for approval workflows or direct ERP posting

Who each one is for

AttributeActivepiecesMakeParseur
Best for
  • Zapier-style automations on a budget
  • Giving AI assistants access to your apps
  • Long multi-step workflows
  • Self-hosted automation for teams
  • Multi-step marketing workflows
  • Branching logic and filters
  • Processing batches of records
  • Automation on a budget
  • Order and booking emails into a spreadsheet
  • Lead notification emails into a CRM
  • Supplier invoices and delivery notes
  • Recurring PDF reports
  • Feeding Zapier and Make workflows
You'll find it used by
  • Small teams
  • Ops teams
  • Developers
  • Agencies
  • Marketers
  • Ops teams
  • Agencies
  • Consultants
  • Small business owners
  • Operations teams
  • E-commerce stores
  • Property and travel businesses
  • Bookkeepers

Questions people ask

Which is better, Activepieces, Make or Parseur?

Make scores highest overall in our ratings (Activepieces 4.0/5, Make 4.3/5 and Parseur 4.1/5). Activepieces is best for zapier-style automations on a budget and Giving AI assistants access to your apps. Make is best for multi-step marketing workflows and branching logic and filters. Parseur is best for order and booking emails into a spreadsheet and lead notification emails into a CRM.

Which is cheaper, Activepieces, Make or Parseur?

Activepieces: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at $20/mo flat. Make: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at From $9/mo. Parseur: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at $49/mo.

Which is easier to use, Activepieces, Make or Parseur?

Parseur rates highest for ease of use in our scores. Small businesses and operations teams that copy details from the same kinds of email or PDF into spreadsheets or other apps.

How we compare

Ratings are our own, from using each tool, across ease of use, features, output quality, value for money, speed & reliability.

Swap in another tool

More tools from Automation & Workflows in the library.