Side-by-side comparison · Coding & Dev Tools
Google Antigravity vs OpenAI Codex vs Warp
Everything that matters when choosing between them, in one place: our rating, what each can do, what they cost, and the trade-offs.
Comparing 3 tools, the maximum.
At a glance
Pick it if: Google AI Pro subscribers, and anyone who wants to try handing coding work to AI agents for free.
Pick it if: ChatGPT subscribers who want a coding agent without paying for a second subscription.
Overview
| Attribute | Google Antigravity | OpenAI Codex | Warp |
|---|---|---|---|
| In one line | Google's free coding app. You hand tasks to AI agents and review what they produce. | OpenAI's coding agent. Hand it a task and it works away while you do other things. | A modern terminal where you can type what you want in plain English instead of commands. |
| Pricing model | Freemium | Freemium | Freemium |
| Starting price | $19.99/mo | $8/mo | $20/mo |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Works with Claude Code | No | No | No |
Rating breakdown
Our scores out of 5. The higher bar in each row is highlighted.
| Attribute | Google Antigravity | OpenAI Codex | Warp |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 3.9 | 4.2Winner | 4.1 |
| Ease of useHow quickly someone non-technical gets value from it. | 3.5 | 3.5 | 4.5 |
| FeaturesHow completely it covers its own job, and how well the pieces fit together. | 4.0 | 4.5 | 4.0 |
| Output qualityHow good the results are before you fix them. | 4.0 | 4.5 | 3.5 |
| Value for moneyWhat you get for the price, including the free plan. | 4.5 | 4.5 | 4.0 |
| Speed & reliabilityHow fast it is and how often it falls over. | 3.5 | 4.0 | 4.5 |
Feature comparison
A tick means it does this today. A dash means we haven't checked.
| Attribute | Google Antigravity | OpenAI Codex | Warp |
|---|---|---|---|
| Access & platform | |||
| Free plan | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile app | No | Yes | No |
| Desktop app | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Browser extension | Yes | No | No |
| API access | Yes | Yes | – |
| Teams & business | |||
| Team workspace | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Enterprise plan or SSO | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Connects to other apps | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Open source or self-hosted | No | Yes | No |
| AI abilities | |||
| Works with your files | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Understands images | Yes | Yes | – |
| Makes images | Yes | No | No |
| Makes video | No | No | No |
| Writes code | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Runs agents or automations | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Learns your brand or style | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Works in many languages | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Capabilities score | 14/ 17 | 14/ 17 | 10/ 17 |
Pricing
Plans as listed on each vendor's site when we last checked. Confirm before you buy.
| Attribute | Google Antigravity | OpenAI Codex | Warp |
|---|---|---|---|
| Plans | IndividualOur pick Free Trying agent-based coding without paying. | Free Free A quick look at what it can do. | FreeOur pick Free Everyone who just wants a better terminal. |
Google AI Pro $19.99/mo People who already have or want the Google AI Pro bundle. | Go $8/mo Occasional light tasks. | Build $20/mo, or $18/mo billed yearly People who lean on the Warp agent daily. | |
Google AI Ultra From $99.99/mo Developers who want Antigravity as a daily driver. | PlusOur pick $20/mo Anyone who already pays for ChatGPT. | Max $200/mo, or $180/mo billed yearly Heavy agent users. | |
Business (via Google Cloud) From $30/seat/mo Companies already on Google Cloud. | Pro From $100/mo Developers who hit the Plus limits. | Business $50/user/mo, or $45/user/mo billed yearly Teams that need SSO and usage metrics. | |
Business $20/user/mo billed yearly, or $25 monthly Teams of 2 or more. | Enterprise Custom Large organisations. | ||
Enterprise Custom Large organisations. | |||
| Which plan to pick | Start on the free Individual tier; it is the whole point. If you hit the weekly limits and you also use Gemini for other things, Google AI Pro at $19.99 is a sensible step. Ultra only makes sense for full-time developers. | If you already have ChatGPT Plus, you have Codex: just try it. If you are choosing between this and Claude Code with no existing subscription, Plus at $20 and Claude Pro at $20 cost the same, so pick whichever chat assistant you prefer. If you outgrow Plus, Pro starts at $100 and has no five-hour limit for now. The $200 tier gives new subscribers less usage than it used to, and Ultrafast mode is only on the $500 tier. | Stay on Free. The terminal is the product, and you can run Claude Code inside it on your Claude subscription without paying Warp anything. Only buy Build if you find yourself using Warp's own agent more than Claude Code. |
Key features
| Attribute | Google Antigravity | OpenAI Codex | Warp |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standout features |
|
|
|
Pros and cons
| Attribute | Google Antigravity | OpenAI Codex | Warp |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pros |
|
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
|
Who each one is for
| Attribute | Google Antigravity | OpenAI Codex | Warp |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best for |
|
|
|
| You'll find it used by |
|
|
|
Questions people ask
Which is better, Google Antigravity, OpenAI Codex or Warp?
OpenAI Codex scores highest overall in our ratings (Google Antigravity 3.9/5, OpenAI Codex 4.2/5 and Warp 4.1/5). Google Antigravity is best for Trying AI coding agents for free and running several agents at once. OpenAI Codex is best for background tasks in the cloud and starting a task from your phone. Warp is best for A nicer home for Claude Code and Plain-English commands.
Which is cheaper, Google Antigravity, OpenAI Codex or Warp?
Google Antigravity: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at $19.99/mo. OpenAI Codex: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at $8/mo. Warp: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at $20/mo.
Which is easier to use, Google Antigravity, OpenAI Codex or Warp?
Warp rates highest for ease of use in our scores. Anyone who has to use the terminal but never wanted to learn it.
How we compare
Ratings are our own, from using each tool, across ease of use, features, output quality, value for money, speed & reliability.
Swap in another tool
More tools from Coding & Dev Tools in the library.
