Side-by-side comparison · Presentations & Docs
Gamma vs Pitch vs Presentations.AI
Everything that matters when choosing between them, in one place: our rating, what each can do, what they cost, and the trade-offs.
Comparing 3 tools, the maximum.
At a glance
Pick it if: Anyone who dreads building slides and would rather start from a finished draft than a blank template.
Pick it if: Startups and sales teams who build decks together and want to know what happens after they send them.
Pick it if: Sales teams, founders and marketers who make business decks often and want them on brand without a designer.
Overview
| Attribute | Gamma | Pitch | Presentations.AI |
|---|---|---|---|
| In one line | Paste an outline and get a well-designed deck, doc or web page in minutes. | Collaborative deck builder for teams, with AI drafts, shared templates and view tracking. | Makes on-brand slide decks from a prompt or document, and tracks who views them. |
| Pricing model | Freemium | Freemium | Freemium |
| Starting price | Free | €10/mo | $0 |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Works with Claude Code | Yes | No | Yes |
Rating breakdown
Our scores out of 5. The higher bar in each row is highlighted.
| Attribute | Gamma | Pitch | Presentations.AI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.5Winner | 4.0 | 3.6 |
| Ease of useHow quickly someone non-technical gets value from it. | 5.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| FeaturesHow completely it covers its own job, and how well the pieces fit together. | 4.5 | 4.0 | 3.5 |
| Output qualityHow good the results are before you fix them. | 4.5 | 4.0 | 3.5 |
| Value for moneyWhat you get for the price, including the free plan. | 4.0 | 4.0 | 3.0 |
| Speed & reliabilityHow fast it is and how often it falls over. | 4.5 | 4.0 | 4.0 |
Feature comparison
A tick means it does this today. A dash means we haven't checked.
| Attribute | Gamma | Pitch | Presentations.AI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Access & platform | |||
| Free plan | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile app | Yes | Yes | No |
| Desktop app | No | Yes | No |
| Browser extension | No | No | Yes |
| API access | Yes | No | Yes |
| Teams & business | |||
| Team workspace | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Enterprise plan or SSO | Yes | Yes | – |
| Connects to other apps | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Open source or self-hosted | No | No | No |
| AI abilities | |||
| Works with your files | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Understands images | – | – | – |
| Makes images | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Makes video | No | No | No |
| Writes code | No | No | No |
| Runs agents or automations | Yes | No | Yes |
| Learns your brand or style | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Works in many languages | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Capabilities score | 11/ 17 | 10/ 17 | 10/ 17 |
Pricing
Plans as listed on each vendor's site when we last checked. Confirm before you buy.
| Attribute | Gamma | Pitch | Presentations.AI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Plans | Free Free Testing whether the output suits you. | Free Free Individuals and teams of up to five trying it out. | Starter $0 Trying a deck or two. |
PlusOur pick See website Individuals who make a few decks a month. | PlusOur pick €10/mo billed yearly One person who sends decks to clients. | ProOur pick $20/mo billed yearly ($240) People who present regularly. | |
Pro See website People who present weekly or want analytics and the API. | Team €15/seat/mo billed yearly Small teams building decks together. | Gold $100/mo billed yearly ($1,200) Teams where decks win or lose deals. | |
Ultra See website Heavy users running Gamma all day. | Business €20/seat/mo billed yearly Larger teams sending lots of decks. | ||
Business See website Companies that need admin controls and single sign-on. | Enterprise Custom Companies of 30 or more seats with security needs. | ||
| Which plan to pick | Use the free credits to make two or three decks and judge the output. If you'll keep using it, Plus is the sensible step because it removes the badge and refreshes credits monthly. Only move to Pro if you want the API, custom domains or viewer analytics. | Start on Free, which is enough to decide if the editor suits you. A solo consultant should move to Plus for clean PowerPoint exports. A sales team of three or more should go straight to Team for the shared credits and viewer tracking. | Make one real deck on Starter. If it beats your current process, Pro covers most people. Gold only makes sense for teams that need custom templates and a shared knowledge base. Compare it with Gamma before paying for a year. |
Key features
| Attribute | Gamma | Pitch | Presentations.AI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standout features |
|
|
|
Pros and cons
| Attribute | Gamma | Pitch | Presentations.AI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pros |
|
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
|
Who each one is for
| Attribute | Gamma | Pitch | Presentations.AI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best for |
|
|
|
| You'll find it used by |
|
|
|
Questions people ask
Which is better, Gamma, Pitch or Presentations.AI?
Gamma scores highest overall in our ratings (Gamma 4.5/5, Pitch 4.0/5 and Presentations.AI 3.6/5). Gamma is best for pitch decks from notes and internal updates and proposals. Pitch is best for fundraising and sales decks and collaborative editing. Presentations.AI is best for sales and pitch decks and turning a document into slides.
Which is cheaper, Gamma, Pitch or Presentations.AI?
Gamma: It's free to use. Pitch: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at €10/mo. Presentations.AI: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at $0.
Which is easier to use, Gamma, Pitch or Presentations.AI?
Gamma rates highest for ease of use in our scores. Anyone who dreads building slides and would rather start from a finished draft than a blank template.
How we compare
Ratings are our own, from using each tool, across ease of use, features, output quality, value for money, speed & reliability.
Swap in another tool
More tools from Presentations & Docs in the library.
