Side-by-side comparison · Presentations & Docs
Gamma vs Napkin AI vs Pitch
Everything that matters when choosing between them, in one place: our rating, what each can do, what they cost, and the trade-offs.
Comparing 3 tools, the maximum.
At a glance
Pick it if: Anyone who dreads building slides and would rather start from a finished draft than a blank template.
Pick it if: Marketers, consultants and business owners who want clear visuals for slides, posts and reports without opening a design tool.
Pick it if: Startups and sales teams who build decks together and want to know what happens after they send them.
Gamma scores highest overall, but Napkin AI gives you more for your money. Which one is right comes down to what you value most.
Overview
| Attribute | Gamma | Napkin AI | Pitch |
|---|---|---|---|
| In one line | Paste an outline and get a well-designed deck, doc or web page in minutes. | Turns your text into clean diagrams, flowcharts and charts for slides and posts. | Collaborative deck builder for teams, with AI drafts, shared templates and view tracking. |
| Pricing model | Freemium | Freemium | Freemium |
| Starting price | Free | $0 | €10/mo |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Works with Claude Code | Yes | Yes | No |
Rating breakdown
Our scores out of 5. The higher bar in each row is highlighted.
| Attribute | Gamma | Napkin AI | Pitch |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.5Winner | 4.3 | 4.0 |
| Ease of useHow quickly someone non-technical gets value from it. | 5.0 | 4.5 | 4.0 |
| FeaturesHow completely it covers its own job, and how well the pieces fit together. | 4.5 | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| Output qualityHow good the results are before you fix them. | 4.5 | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| Value for moneyWhat you get for the price, including the free plan. | 4.0 | 4.5 | 4.0 |
| Speed & reliabilityHow fast it is and how often it falls over. | 4.5 | 4.5 | 4.0 |
Feature comparison
A tick means it does this today. A dash means we haven't checked.
| Attribute | Gamma | Napkin AI | Pitch |
|---|---|---|---|
| Access & platform | |||
| Free plan | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile app | Yes | No | Yes |
| Desktop app | No | No | Yes |
| Browser extension | No | – | No |
| API access | Yes | Yes | No |
| Teams & business | |||
| Team workspace | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Enterprise plan or SSO | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Connects to other apps | Yes | No | Yes |
| Open source or self-hosted | No | No | No |
| AI abilities | |||
| Works with your files | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Understands images | – | – | – |
| Makes images | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Makes video | No | No | No |
| Writes code | No | No | No |
| Runs agents or automations | Yes | No | No |
| Learns your brand or style | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Works in many languages | Yes | – | Yes |
| Capabilities score | 11/ 17 | 7/ 17 | 10/ 17 |
Pricing
Plans as listed on each vendor's site when we last checked. Confirm before you buy.
| Attribute | Gamma | Napkin AI | Pitch |
|---|---|---|---|
| Plans | Free Free Testing whether the output suits you. | Free $0 Trying it and the odd visual. | Free Free Individuals and teams of up to five trying it out. |
PlusOur pick See website Individuals who make a few decks a month. | PlusOur pick $12/mo, or $9/mo billed yearly People making visuals every week. | PlusOur pick €10/mo billed yearly One person who sends decks to clients. | |
Pro See website People who present weekly or want analytics and the API. | Pro $30/mo, or $22/mo billed yearly Heavy users and brand-conscious teams. | Team €15/seat/mo billed yearly Small teams building decks together. | |
Ultra See website Heavy users running Gamma all day. | Enterprise Custom Larger organisations. | Business €20/seat/mo billed yearly Larger teams sending lots of decks. | |
Business See website Companies that need admin controls and single sign-on. | Enterprise Custom Companies of 30 or more seats with security needs. | ||
| Which plan to pick | Use the free credits to make two or three decks and judge the output. If you'll keep using it, Plus is the sensible step because it removes the badge and refreshes credits monthly. Only move to Pro if you want the API, custom domains or viewer analytics. | Free is enough to see if it fits how you work. If you'll put visuals in client decks, Plus removes the branding and adds PowerPoint export for $9 a month on yearly billing. Pro is for people who need custom fonts or lots of credits. | Start on Free, which is enough to decide if the editor suits you. A solo consultant should move to Plus for clean PowerPoint exports. A sales team of three or more should go straight to Team for the shared credits and viewer tracking. |
Key features
| Attribute | Gamma | Napkin AI | Pitch |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standout features |
|
|
|
Pros and cons
| Attribute | Gamma | Napkin AI | Pitch |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pros |
|
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
|
Who each one is for
| Attribute | Gamma | Napkin AI | Pitch |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best for |
|
|
|
| You'll find it used by |
|
|
|
Questions people ask
Which is better, Gamma, Napkin AI or Pitch?
Gamma scores highest overall in our ratings (Gamma 4.5/5, Napkin AI 4.3/5 and Pitch 4.0/5). Gamma is best for pitch decks from notes and internal updates and proposals. Napkin AI is best for diagrams for slide decks and visuals for LinkedIn and blog posts. Pitch is best for fundraising and sales decks and collaborative editing.
Which is cheaper, Gamma, Napkin AI or Pitch?
Gamma: It's free to use. Napkin AI: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at $0. Pitch: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at €10/mo.
Which is easier to use, Gamma, Napkin AI or Pitch?
Gamma rates highest for ease of use in our scores. Anyone who dreads building slides and would rather start from a finished draft than a blank template.
How we compare
Ratings are our own, from using each tool, across ease of use, features, output quality, value for money, speed & reliability.
Swap in another tool
More tools from Presentations & Docs in the library.
