Skip to content

Side-by-side comparison · SEO & Analytics

DataForSEO vs Contentsquare (formerly Hotjar) vs SE Ranking

Everything that matters when choosing between them, in one place: our rating, what each can do, what they cost, and the trade-offs.

DataForSEO

4.0

From From $50 top-up

Best overall

Contentsquare (formerly Hotjar)

4.3

From From $39/mo

SE Ranking

4.1

From $129/mo

Comparing 3 tools, the maximum.

At a glance

Best value

Pick it if: Anyone using Claude Code or building their own tools who wants real SEO data without a big monthly plan.

Best overallEasiest to use

Pick it if: Store owners, marketers and UX teams who want to see and hear why visitors leave, with surveys alongside the recordings.

Pick it if: Small businesses, freelancers and agencies who want a full SEO toolkit with AI search tracking for less than the big names.

Contentsquare (formerly Hotjar) scores highest overall, but DataForSEO gives you more for your money. Which one is right comes down to what you value most.

Overview

AttributeDataForSEOContentsquare (formerly Hotjar)SE Ranking
In one lineRaw search, keyword and backlink data you pay for by the query, built for AI agents.Heatmaps, session replays and surveys that show why visitors leave, with AI summaries.A cheaper all-in-one SEO tool that also tracks your brand in AI search answers.
Pricing modelPaidFreemiumPaid
Starting priceFrom $50 top-upFrom $39/mo$129/mo
Free plan No Yes No
Works with Claude Code Yes Yes Yes

Rating breakdown

Our scores out of 5. The higher bar in each row is highlighted.

AttributeDataForSEOContentsquare (formerly Hotjar)SE Ranking
Overall rating4.04.3Winner4.1
Ease of useHow quickly someone non-technical gets value from it.
2.5
4.5
4.0
FeaturesHow completely it covers its own job, and how well the pieces fit together.
4.0
4.5
4.5
Output qualityHow good the results are before you fix them.
4.0
4.0
3.5
Value for moneyWhat you get for the price, including the free plan.
5.0
4.5
4.5
Speed & reliabilityHow fast it is and how often it falls over.
4.5
4.0
4.0

Feature comparison

A tick means it does this today. A dash means we haven't checked.

AttributeDataForSEOContentsquare (formerly Hotjar)SE Ranking
Access & platform
Free plan No Yes No
Mobile app No No No
Desktop app No No No
Browser extension No No Yes
API access Yes Yes Yes
Teams & business
Team workspace– Yes Yes
Enterprise plan or SSO No Yes Yes
Connects to other apps Yes Yes Yes
Open source or self-hosted No No No
AI abilities
Works with your files No No No
Understands images No––
Makes images No No No
Makes video No No No
Writes code No No No
Runs agents or automations No No No
Learns your brand or style No––
Works in many languages Yes Yes Yes
Capabilities score3/ 176/ 176/ 17

Pricing

Plans as listed on each vendor's site when we last checked. Confirm before you buy.

AttributeDataForSEOContentsquare (formerly Hotjar)SE Ranking
Plans

Pay as you goOur pick

From $50 top-up

Anyone who wants real data in Claude Code without a subscription.

FreeOur pick

Free

Most small business websites.

CoreOur pick

$129/mo, or $103.20/mo billed yearly

Small businesses and freelancers.

Growth

From $39/mo billed yearly, or $49 monthly

Businesses that want AI summaries and longer history.

Growth

$279/mo, or $223.20/mo billed yearly

Agencies and teams with many sites.

Pro

Custom

Teams running conversion work across many sites.

Enterprise

Custom

Large teams.

Enterprise

Custom

Large companies.

Which plan to pickThere's only one way to pay. Use the $1 trial credit to test the MCP server, then top up $50 and set a daily limit of a dollar or two. Use the cheaper standard queue for bulk jobs and the live mode only when you need an answer now.Start on Free. For most small sites it does what Hotjar's paid plans used to. Take the 15-day Growth trial to see if the AI summaries save you time before paying. Survey responses are a separate product with their own Growth plan from $79 a month.Start the 14-day free trial. Core covers most small businesses and freelancers, and paying yearly saves 20%. Agencies should look at Growth plus the $69 a month Agency Pack for white-label reports and client seats.

Key features

AttributeDataForSEOContentsquare (formerly Hotjar)SE Ranking
Standout features
  • SERP API
  • Keywords Data
  • DataForSEO Labs
  • Backlinks API
  • MCP server
  • Spend controls
  • Heatmaps
  • Session replay
  • Surveys and feedback
  • Funnels and journeys
  • Sense AI
  • MCP connection
  • Daily rank tracking
  • Keyword and competitor research
  • Website audit
  • AI visibility
  • Content tools
  • API and MCP

Pros and cons

AttributeDataForSEOContentsquare (formerly Hotjar)SE Ranking
Pros
  • Costs cents per lookup with no monthly fee
  • Official MCP server works well with Claude Code
  • Covers search results, keywords, backlinks and more in one account
  • Balance never expires and spending limits protect you
  • Live results for any location, including Australian cities
  • Huge free plan at 200,000 sessions a month
  • Heatmaps, replays, funnels and surveys in one place
  • Polished, easy interface
  • AI summaries save watching hours of recordings
  • MCP connection works on the free plan
  • Much cheaper than Ahrefs or Semrush for similar features
  • AI visibility tracking on every plan
  • API and MCP access included
  • Strong white-label reports for agencies
  • 14-day trial without a card
Cons
  • No friendly dashboard; you need Claude Code or a developer to use it
  • Per-request pricing is confusing until you've used it for a while
  • Keyword difficulty and traffic estimates are less polished than Ahrefs
  • No real free plan, just a $1 trial credit
  • The Hotjar name is gone and new Hotjar accounts are closed
  • Overlaps with Microsoft Clarity, which is free and unlimited
  • AI features need a paid plan
  • Surveys, product analytics and replays are separate products with separate prices
  • Pro and Enterprise prices aren't published
  • Smaller keyword and backlink data than the biggest suites
  • Extra seats, keywords and locations cost more
  • No cheap entry plan any more
  • Deeper AI tracking in SE Visible is a separate subscription

Who each one is for

AttributeDataForSEOContentsquare (formerly Hotjar)SE Ranking
Best for
  • SEO research from Claude Code
  • Keyword volumes on demand
  • Live search result checks
  • Backlink data for custom reports
  • Seeing why visitors leave a page
  • Heatmaps and session replays
  • On-site surveys and feedback
  • Testing landing pages for ad campaigns
  • Daily rank tracking on a budget
  • Agencies needing white-label client reports
  • Tracking your brand in AI answers alongside Google
  • All-round SEO for small businesses
You'll find it used by
  • Claude Code users
  • Developers
  • Agencies
  • SEO tool builders
  • Store owners
  • Marketers
  • UX designers
  • Agencies
  • Agencies
  • Freelancers
  • Small businesses
  • In-house marketers

Questions people ask

Which is better, DataForSEO, Contentsquare (formerly Hotjar) or SE Ranking?

Contentsquare (formerly Hotjar) scores highest overall in our ratings (DataForSEO 4.0/5, Contentsquare (formerly Hotjar) 4.3/5 and SE Ranking 4.1/5). DataForSEO is best for SEO research from Claude Code and keyword volumes on demand. Contentsquare (formerly Hotjar) is best for seeing why visitors leave a page and heatmaps and session replays. SE Ranking is best for daily rank tracking on a budget and agencies needing white-label client reports.

Which is cheaper, DataForSEO, Contentsquare (formerly Hotjar) or SE Ranking?

DataForSEO: There's no free plan. Paid plans start at From $50 top-up. Contentsquare (formerly Hotjar): There's a free plan, and paid plans start at From $39/mo. SE Ranking: There's no free plan. Paid plans start at $129/mo.

Which is easier to use, DataForSEO, Contentsquare (formerly Hotjar) or SE Ranking?

Contentsquare (formerly Hotjar) rates highest for ease of use in our scores. Store owners, marketers and UX teams who want to see and hear why visitors leave, with surveys alongside the recordings.

How we compare

Ratings are our own, from using each tool, across ease of use, features, output quality, value for money, speed & reliability.

Swap in another tool

More tools from SEO & Analytics in the library.