Skip to content

Side-by-side comparison ยท SEO & Analytics

Ahrefs vs DataForSEO vs Contentsquare (formerly Hotjar)

Everything that matters when choosing between them, in one place: our rating, what each can do, what they cost, and the trade-offs.

Best overall

Ahrefs

4.4

From $29/mo

DataForSEO

4.0

From From $50 top-up

Contentsquare (formerly Hotjar)

4.3

From From $39/mo

Comparing 3 tools, the maximum.

At a glance

Best overall

Pick it if: Marketers and business owners who want to see what competitors rank for and find keywords worth chasing.

Best value

Pick it if: Anyone using Claude Code or building their own tools who wants real SEO data without a big monthly plan.

Pick it if: Store owners, marketers and UX teams who want to see and hear why visitors leave, with surveys alongside the recordings.

Ahrefs scores highest overall, but DataForSEO gives you more for your money. Which one is right comes down to what you value most.

Overview

AttributeAhrefsDataForSEOContentsquare (formerly Hotjar)
In one lineKeyword research, backlink checks and site audits in one toolkit.Raw search, keyword and backlink data you pay for by the query, built for AI agents.Heatmaps, session replays and surveys that show why visitors leave, with AI summaries.
Pricing modelFreemiumPaidFreemium
Starting price$29/moFrom $50 top-upFrom $39/mo
Free plan Yes No Yes
Works with Claude Code Yes Yes Yes

Rating breakdown

Our scores out of 5. The higher bar in each row is highlighted.

AttributeAhrefsDataForSEOContentsquare (formerly Hotjar)
Overall rating4.4Winner4.04.3
Ease of useHow quickly someone non-technical gets value from it.
4.5
2.5
4.5
FeaturesHow completely it covers its own job, and how well the pieces fit together.
5.0
4.0
4.5
Output qualityHow good the results are before you fix them.
4.5
4.0
4.0
Value for moneyWhat you get for the price, including the free plan.
3.5
5.0
4.5
Speed & reliabilityHow fast it is and how often it falls over.
4.5
4.5
4.0

Feature comparison

A tick means it does this today. A dash means we haven't checked.

AttributeAhrefsDataForSEOContentsquare (formerly Hotjar)
Access & platform
Free plan Yes No Yes
Mobile app No No No
Desktop app No No No
Browser extension Yes No No
API access Yes Yes Yes
Teams & business
Team workspace Yesโ€“ Yes
Enterprise plan or SSO Yes No Yes
Connects to other apps Yes Yes Yes
Open source or self-hosted No No No
AI abilities
Works with your files Yes No No
Understands images No Noโ€“
Makes images No No No
Makes video No No No
Writes code No No No
Runs agents or automations No No No
Learns your brand or style No Noโ€“
Works in many languages Yes Yes Yes
Capabilities score8/ 173/ 176/ 17

Pricing

Plans as listed on each vendor's site when we last checked. Confirm before you buy.

AttributeAhrefsDataForSEOContentsquare (formerly Hotjar)
Plans

Ahrefs Free

Free

Checking the health and backlinks of a site you own.

Pay as you goOur pick

From $50 top-up

Anyone who wants real data in Claude Code without a subscription.

FreeOur pick

Free

Most small business websites.

Starter

$29/mo

Occasional keyword research on a tight budget.

Growth

From $39/mo billed yearly, or $49 monthly

Businesses that want AI summaries and longer history.

LiteOur pick

$129/mo

A business doing its own SEO seriously.

Pro

Custom

Teams running conversion work across many sites.

Standard

$249/mo

Freelancers and small agencies.

Enterprise

Custom

Large companies.

Advanced

$449/mo

Agencies and in-house teams with many sites.

Enterprise

$1,499/mo billed yearly

Large companies that need SSO and unlimited data.

Which plan to pickStart on Ahrefs Free to audit your own site. If you want to research competitors and keywords every week, go straight to Lite; the Starter plan's credits run out too quickly to be useful for more than the odd lookup. Each plan includes one user, and extra seats cost $40 to $80 a month.There's only one way to pay. Use the $1 trial credit to test the MCP server, then top up $50 and set a daily limit of a dollar or two. Use the cheaper standard queue for bulk jobs and the live mode only when you need an answer now.Start on Free. For most small sites it does what Hotjar's paid plans used to. Take the 15-day Growth trial to see if the AI summaries save you time before paying. Survey responses are a separate product with their own Growth plan from $79 a month.

Key features

AttributeAhrefsDataForSEOContentsquare (formerly Hotjar)
Standout features
  • Site Explorer
  • Keywords Explorer
  • Site Audit
  • Rank Tracker
  • Brand Radar
  • MCP server
  • SERP API
  • Keywords Data
  • DataForSEO Labs
  • Backlinks API
  • MCP server
  • Spend controls
  • Heatmaps
  • Session replay
  • Surveys and feedback
  • Funnels and journeys
  • Sense AI
  • MCP connection

Pros and cons

AttributeAhrefsDataForSEOContentsquare (formerly Hotjar)
Pros
  • The most trusted backlink index in the industry
  • Cleaner and faster to learn than Semrush
  • Site Audit explains problems simply
  • Free plan covers your own site properly
  • Official MCP server for Claude on Lite and above
  • Costs cents per lookup with no monthly fee
  • Official MCP server works well with Claude Code
  • Covers search results, keywords, backlinks and more in one account
  • Balance never expires and spending limits protect you
  • Live results for any location, including Australian cities
  • Huge free plan at 200,000 sessions a month
  • Heatmaps, replays, funnels and surveys in one place
  • Polished, easy interface
  • AI summaries save watching hours of recordings
  • MCP connection works on the free plan
Cons
  • Lite at $129 a month is steep for a small business
  • The Starter plan's credits run out fast and it has no API or MCP access
  • No free trial for the paid plans
  • Extra users cost $40 to $80 a month each
  • Traffic figures are estimates and can be well off for small sites
  • No friendly dashboard; you need Claude Code or a developer to use it
  • Per-request pricing is confusing until you've used it for a while
  • Keyword difficulty and traffic estimates are less polished than Ahrefs
  • No real free plan, just a $1 trial credit
  • The Hotjar name is gone and new Hotjar accounts are closed
  • Overlaps with Microsoft Clarity, which is free and unlimited
  • AI features need a paid plan
  • Surveys, product analytics and replays are separate products with separate prices
  • Pro and Enterprise prices aren't published

Who each one is for

AttributeAhrefsDataForSEOContentsquare (formerly Hotjar)
Best for
  • Keyword research
  • Competitor traffic estimates
  • Backlink analysis
  • Technical site audits
  • Finding topics competitors cover that you don't
  • SEO research from Claude Code
  • Keyword volumes on demand
  • Live search result checks
  • Backlink data for custom reports
  • Seeing why visitors leave a page
  • Heatmaps and session replays
  • On-site surveys and feedback
  • Testing landing pages for ad campaigns
You'll find it used by
  • SEO specialists
  • Marketers
  • Agencies
  • Content teams
  • Claude Code users
  • Developers
  • Agencies
  • SEO tool builders
  • Store owners
  • Marketers
  • UX designers
  • Agencies

Questions people ask

Which is better, Ahrefs, DataForSEO or Contentsquare (formerly Hotjar)?

Ahrefs scores highest overall in our ratings (Ahrefs 4.4/5, DataForSEO 4.0/5 and Contentsquare (formerly Hotjar) 4.3/5). Ahrefs is best for keyword research and competitor traffic estimates. DataForSEO is best for SEO research from Claude Code and keyword volumes on demand. Contentsquare (formerly Hotjar) is best for seeing why visitors leave a page and heatmaps and session replays.

Which is cheaper, Ahrefs, DataForSEO or Contentsquare (formerly Hotjar)?

Ahrefs: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at $29/mo. DataForSEO: There's no free plan. Paid plans start at From $50 top-up. Contentsquare (formerly Hotjar): There's a free plan, and paid plans start at From $39/mo.

How we compare

Ratings are our own, from using each tool, across ease of use, features, output quality, value for money, speed & reliability.

Swap in another tool

More tools from SEO & Analytics in the library.