Skip to content

Side-by-side comparison · Coding & Dev Tools

Cursor vs OpenAI Codex vs Vapi

Everything that matters when choosing between them, in one place: our rating, what each can do, what they cost, and the trade-offs.

Cursor

3.9

From $8/mo

Best overall

OpenAI Codex

4.2

From $8/mo

Vapi

3.6

From $0.05/min hosting

Comparing 3 tools, the maximum.

At a glance

Easiest to use

Pick it if: Developers and curious beginners who want AI help but still want a visual editor.

Best overallBest value

Pick it if: ChatGPT subscribers who want a coding agent without paying for a second subscription.

Vapi3.6

Pick it if: Developers and voice AI agencies building custom phone or in-app voice agents.

Overview

AttributeCursorOpenAI CodexVapi
In one lineA code editor with AI built in, for people who want to watch every change happen.OpenAI's coding agent. Hand it a task and it works away while you do other things.Developer platform for building voice AI agents that make and take phone calls.
Pricing modelFreemiumFreemiumPaid
Starting price$8/mo$8/mo$0.05/min hosting
Free plan Yes Yes No
Works with Claude Code No No Yes

Rating breakdown

Our scores out of 5. The higher bar in each row is highlighted.

AttributeCursorOpenAI CodexVapi
Overall rating3.94.2Winner3.6
Ease of useHow quickly someone non-technical gets value from it.
4.0
3.5
2.5
FeaturesHow completely it covers its own job, and how well the pieces fit together.
4.5
4.5
4.5
Output qualityHow good the results are before you fix them.
4.0
4.5
4.0
Value for moneyWhat you get for the price, including the free plan.
3.0
4.5
3.5
Speed & reliabilityHow fast it is and how often it falls over.
4.0
4.0
3.5

Feature comparison

A tick means it does this today. A dash means we haven't checked.

AttributeCursorOpenAI CodexVapi
Access & platform
Free plan Yes Yes No
Mobile app Yes Yes–
Desktop app Yes Yes–
Browser extension No No–
API access– Yes Yes
Teams & business
Team workspace Yes Yes Yes
Enterprise plan or SSO Yes Yes Yes
Connects to other apps Yes Yes Yes
Open source or self-hosted No Yes No
AI abilities
Works with your files Yes Yes–
Understands images Yes Yes–
Makes images No No No
Makes video No No No
Writes code Yes Yes No
Runs agents or automations Yes Yes Yes
Learns your brand or style Yes Yes–
Works in many languages Yes Yes Yes
Capabilities score12/ 1714/ 176/ 17

Pricing

Plans as listed on each vendor's site when we last checked. Confirm before you buy.

AttributeCursorOpenAI CodexVapi
Plans

Free

Free

Trying the editor and a few agent runs.

Free

Free

A quick look at what it can do.

Pay as you goOur pick

$0.05/min hosting, plus provider costs

Developers building and testing.

Plus

$8/mo

Light users who are happy with Grok models only.

Go

$8/mo

Occasional light tasks.

Core

$29/mo plus usage

Builders and early teams going live.

PremiumOur pick

$30/mo

Most developers, especially if you want Claude alongside Grok.

PlusOur pick

$20/mo

Anyone who already pays for ChatGPT.

Pro

10% of hosting fee, $999/mo minimum

Teams running voice agents in production at scale.

Super or Ultra

$100/mo or $200/mo

Heavy daily agent users.

Pro

From $100/mo

Developers who hit the Plus limits.

Premier

Custom

Large organisations.

Legacy Pro

$20/mo

Existing subscribers only. New customers can't buy it.

Business

$20/user/mo billed yearly, or $25 monthly

Teams of 2 or more.

Teams

From $30/user/mo

Companies that need admin controls and SSO.

Enterprise

Custom

Large organisations.

Which plan to pickIf you are on the old $20 Pro plan and it covers what you use, stay put; switching is permanent. New customers should skip Plus unless they are happy with Grok. Premium is the realistic starting point if you want Claude, and budget for the extra usage billing on top of the $30. Large companies can ask about a custom Enterprise plan.If you already have ChatGPT Plus, you have Codex: just try it. If you are choosing between this and Claude Code with no existing subscription, Plus at $20 and Claude Pro at $20 cost the same, so pick whichever chat assistant you prefer. If you outgrow Plus, Pro starts at $100 and has no five-hour limit for now. The $200 tier gives new subscribers less usage than it used to, and Ultrafast mode is only on the $500 tier.Build on pay as you go, then add Core when you go live and want email support. HIPAA compliance is a separate $2,000-a-month add-on, so check that early if you work in healthcare.

Key features

AttributeCursorOpenAI CodexVapi
Standout features
  • Tab autocomplete
  • Agent mode
  • Chat with your codebase
  • Cloud agents and automations
  • Rules
  • Built on VS Code
  • Cloud tasks
  • Desktop app and CLI
  • Start from your phone
  • Automatic code review
  • AGENTS.md
  • Open source CLI
  • Bring your own providers
  • Phone and web
  • Tools and actions
  • Workflows
  • Testing and monitoring
  • Developer tools

Pros and cons

AttributeCursorOpenAI CodexVapi
Pros
  • The clearest view of what an AI is doing to your code
  • Autocomplete is still the best in the category
  • Feels familiar instantly if you have used VS Code
  • Cloud agents and code review on the mid plans
  • Included with every ChatGPT plan, so many people already have it
  • Cloud tasks let you start work from anywhere and come back later
  • Strong on tough, multi-file coding jobs
  • The CLI is open source and works with an API key
  • Full choice of speech, model, voice and phone providers
  • Strong API, SDKs, CLI and MCP for developers
  • Free to start building
  • Large community and templates
Cons
  • Cheap plans only give you Grok models
  • Claude usage is billed on top of the subscription at API prices, so the real cost is hard to predict
  • OpenAI models are due to leave Cursor, which narrows the model choice
  • You now buy it bundled with Grok and X Premium, whether you want them or not
  • Agent runs are less thorough than Claude Code on big tasks
  • Five-hour and weekly limits bite on Plus if you use it seriously
  • Cloud tasks use more of your allowance than local ones
  • It asks fewer questions than Claude Code before changing things
  • Model names and limits change often, which makes it hard to plan costs
  • The $200 Pro tier now gives new subscribers less usage than before
  • Real cost per minute is far above the $0.05 headline
  • Needs a developer to get the most out of it
  • Production users report slow support and breaking changes
  • HIPAA is an expensive add-on

Who each one is for

AttributeCursorOpenAI CodexVapi
Best for
  • Editing with AI autocomplete
  • Learning by watching changes happen
  • Multi-file changes in agent mode
  • Developers who like VS Code
  • Background tasks in the cloud
  • Starting a task from your phone
  • Developers already on ChatGPT Plus
  • Coding in the terminal
  • Custom voice agents built by developers
  • Agencies building AI receptionists for clients
  • Adding voice to an app or website
  • Mixing and matching AI and voice providers
You'll find it used by
  • Developers
  • Startup teams
  • Students
  • Technical founders
  • ChatGPT subscribers
  • Developers
  • Startup teams
  • Solo founders
  • Developers
  • Voice AI agencies
  • Startups
  • Product teams

Questions people ask

Which is better, Cursor, OpenAI Codex or Vapi?

OpenAI Codex scores highest overall in our ratings (Cursor 3.9/5, OpenAI Codex 4.2/5 and Vapi 3.6/5). Cursor is best for editing with AI autocomplete and learning by watching changes happen. OpenAI Codex is best for background tasks in the cloud and starting a task from your phone. Vapi is best for custom voice agents built by developers and agencies building AI receptionists for clients.

Which is cheaper, Cursor, OpenAI Codex or Vapi?

Cursor: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at $8/mo. OpenAI Codex: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at $8/mo. Vapi: There's no free plan. Paid plans start at $0.05/min hosting.

Which is easier to use, Cursor, OpenAI Codex or Vapi?

Cursor rates highest for ease of use in our scores. Developers and curious beginners who want AI help but still want a visual editor.

How we compare

Ratings are our own, from using each tool, across ease of use, features, output quality, value for money, speed & reliability.

Swap in another tool

More tools from Coding & Dev Tools in the library.