Side-by-side comparison · Coding & Dev Tools
Cursor vs GitHub Copilot vs Warp
Everything that matters when choosing between them, in one place: our rating, what each can do, what they cost, and the trade-offs.
Comparing 3 tools, the maximum.
At a glance
Pick it if: Developers and curious beginners who want AI help but still want a visual editor.
Pick it if: Teams and developers whose code lives on GitHub and who want AI in the tools they already use.
Pick it if: Anyone who has to use the terminal but never wanted to learn it.
Warp scores highest overall, but GitHub Copilot gives you more for your money. Which one is right comes down to what you value most.
Overview
| Attribute | Cursor | GitHub Copilot | Warp |
|---|---|---|---|
| In one line | A code editor with AI built in, for people who want to watch every change happen. | GitHub's AI helper: it finishes your code, reviews pull requests and takes on whole tasks. | A modern terminal where you can type what you want in plain English instead of commands. |
| Pricing model | Freemium | Freemium | Freemium |
| Starting price | $8/mo | $10/mo | $20/mo |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Works with Claude Code | No | No | No |
Rating breakdown
Our scores out of 5. The higher bar in each row is highlighted.
| Attribute | Cursor | GitHub Copilot | Warp |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 3.9 | 4.0 | 4.1Winner |
| Ease of useHow quickly someone non-technical gets value from it. | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.5 |
| FeaturesHow completely it covers the job it's built for, and how well the pieces fit together. | 4.5 | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| Output qualityHow good the results are before you fix them. | 4.0 | 3.5 | 3.5 |
| Value for moneyWhat you get for the price, including the free plan. | 3.0 | 4.5 | 4.0 |
| Speed & reliabilityHow fast it is and how often it falls over. | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.5 |
Feature comparison
A tick means it does this today. A dash means we haven't checked.
| Attribute | Cursor | GitHub Copilot | Warp |
|---|---|---|---|
| Access & platform | |||
| Free plan | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile app | Yes | Yes | No |
| Desktop app | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Browser extension | No | – | No |
| API access | – | – | – |
| Teams & business | |||
| Team workspace | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Enterprise plan or SSO | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Connects to other apps | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Open source or self-hosted | No | No | No |
| AI abilities | |||
| Works with your files | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Understands images | Yes | Yes | – |
| Makes images | No | No | No |
| Makes video | No | No | No |
| Writes code | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Runs agents or automations | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Learns your brand or style | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Works in many languages | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Capabilities score | 12/ 17 | 12/ 17 | 10/ 17 |
Pricing
Plans as listed on each vendor's site when we last checked. Confirm before you buy.
| Attribute | Cursor | GitHub Copilot | Warp |
|---|---|---|---|
| Plans | Free Free Trying the editor and a few agent runs. | Free Free Trying autocomplete and light chat. | FreeOur pick Free Everyone who just wants a better terminal. |
Plus $8/mo Light users who are happy with Grok models only. | ProOur pick $10/mo Individual developers on GitHub. | Build $20/mo, or $18/mo billed yearly People who lean on the Warp agent daily. | |
PremiumOur pick $30/mo Most developers who want Claude or OpenAI models. | Pro+ $39/mo Developers who run agent tasks every day. | Max $200/mo, or $180/mo billed yearly Heavy agent users. | |
Super $100/mo Heavy daily agent users. | Max $100/mo Heavy agent-driven work. | Business $50/user/mo, or $45/user/mo billed yearly Teams that need SSO and usage metrics. | |
Teams From $30/user/mo Companies that need admin controls and SSO. | Business and Enterprise See website Companies that need admin controls and policy management. | Enterprise Custom Large organisations. | |
Enterprise Custom Large organisations. | |||
| Which plan to pick | Skip Plus unless you are happy with Grok. Premium is the realistic starting point if you want Claude or OpenAI models, and budget for the extra usage billing on top of the $30. There is also a $200 Ultra plan with 50x the Plus usage for people who live in it. | Pro is the sweet spot for an individual: cheap, unlimited autocomplete and enough credits for a few agent tasks a week. Only move to Pro+ if you find yourself buying extra credits every month. | Stay on Free. The terminal is the product, and you can run Claude Code inside it on your Claude subscription without paying Warp anything. Only buy Build if you find yourself using Warp's own agent more than Claude Code. |
Key features
| Attribute | Cursor | GitHub Copilot | Warp |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standout features |
|
|
|
Pros and cons
| Attribute | Cursor | GitHub Copilot | Warp |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pros |
|
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
|
Who each one is for
| Attribute | Cursor | GitHub Copilot | Warp |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best for |
|
|
|
| You'll find it used by |
|
|
|
Questions people ask
Which is better, Cursor, GitHub Copilot or Warp?
Warp scores highest overall in our ratings (Cursor 3.9/5, GitHub Copilot 4.0/5 and Warp 4.1/5). Cursor is best for editing with AI autocomplete and learning by watching changes happen. GitHub Copilot is best for autocomplete as you type and Handing GitHub issues to an agent. Warp is best for A nicer home for Claude Code and Plain-English commands.
Which is cheaper, Cursor, GitHub Copilot or Warp?
Cursor: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at $8/mo. GitHub Copilot: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at $10/mo. Warp: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at $20/mo.
Which is easier to use, Cursor, GitHub Copilot or Warp?
Warp rates highest for ease of use in our scores. Anyone who has to use the terminal but never wanted to learn it.
How we compare
Ratings are our own, from using each tool, across ease of use, features, output quality, value for money, speed & reliability.
Swap in another tool
More tools from Coding & Dev Tools in the library.
