Skip to content

Side-by-side comparison · Presentations & Docs

ChatPDF vs Claude Docs & Slides vs Quadratic

Everything that matters when choosing between them, in one place: our rating, what each can do, what they cost, and the trade-offs.

ChatPDF

3.9

From $0

Claude Docs & Slides

4.0

From $20/mo

Quadratic

4.0

From $18/user/mo

Comparing 3 tools, the maximum.

At a glance

Easiest to use

Pick it if: Anyone who needs quick answers from a PDF, like a manual, report or contract, without reading the whole thing.

Best value

Pick it if: Anyone who already uses Claude and wants the report or deck at the end of the chat, ready to share.

Pick it if: Analysts, finance staff and founders who outgrow Excel and want AI to write the analysis in a sheet they can check.

Overview

AttributeChatPDFClaude Docs & SlidesQuadratic
In one lineUpload a PDF and ask it questions, with answers that point to the page they came from.Ask Claude for a document or deck, then edit, share and export it without leaving chat.A spreadsheet where AI writes the formulas, Python and SQL to analyse your data.
Pricing modelFreemiumFreemiumFreemium
Starting price$0$20/mo$18/user/mo
Free plan Yes Yes Yes
Works with Claude Code Yes Yes Yes

Rating breakdown

Our scores out of 5. The higher bar in each row is highlighted.

AttributeChatPDFClaude Docs & SlidesQuadratic
Overall rating3.94.04.0
Ease of useHow quickly someone non-technical gets value from it.
5.0
4.5
3.5
FeaturesHow completely it covers its own job, and how well the pieces fit together.
3.5
3.5
4.5
Output qualityHow good the results are before you fix them.
3.5
4.0
4.0
Value for moneyWhat you get for the price, including the free plan.
3.5
4.5
4.0
Speed & reliabilityHow fast it is and how often it falls over.
4.0
3.5
4.0

Feature comparison

A tick means it does this today. A dash means we haven't checked.

AttributeChatPDFClaude Docs & SlidesQuadratic
Access & platform
Free plan Yes Yes Yes
Mobile app No Yes No
Desktop app Yes Yes No
Browser extension No No–
API access Yes– Yes
Teams & business
Team workspace No Yes Yes
Enterprise plan or SSO– Yes Yes
Connects to other apps No Yes Yes
Open source or self-hosted No No Yes
AI abilities
Works with your files Yes Yes Yes
Understands images– Yes–
Makes images No No No
Makes video No No No
Writes code No Yes Yes
Runs agents or automations No Yes Yes
Learns your brand or style– Yes–
Works in many languages Yes Yes–
Capabilities score5/ 1712/ 179/ 17

Pricing

Plans as listed on each vendor's site when we last checked. Confirm before you buy.

AttributeChatPDFClaude Docs & SlidesQuadratic
Plans

Free

$0

The occasional document.

Free

Free

Trying a document or deck.

Personal

Free

Trying it out or light personal analysis.

PlusOur pick

About $19.99/mo, cheaper billed yearly

People who read lots of documents.

ProOur pick

$20/mo, or $17/mo billed yearly

Anyone making documents or decks most weeks.

ProOur pick

$18/user/mo billed yearly

Individuals and small teams doing regular analysis.

Max

From $100/mo

Heavy users who hit Pro limits.

Business

$36/user/mo billed yearly

Teams that lean on the AI every day.

Team

$25/seat/mo, or $20/seat/mo billed yearly

Businesses sharing documents across a team.

Enterprise

Custom

Larger companies with security and hosting rules.

Enterprise

From $20/seat/mo billed yearly, plus usage

Larger organisations needing admin control.

Which plan to pickFree is fine for a document or two a day. Before paying for Plus, try NotebookLM, which is free, or use Claude or ChatGPT if you already pay for one.If you already pay for Claude, you have it. Try it on Free first, and move to Pro once you're making more than the odd document, because decks use up a Free allowance fast. Team makes sense when colleagues need to open and comment on the same documents.Start on the free Personal plan with a real data set. If you use it every week, Pro is enough for most people; move to Business only if you keep running out of AI credits. Monthly billing costs about 10% more than the yearly prices shown.

Key features

AttributeChatPDFClaude Docs & SlidesQuadratic
Standout features
  • Chat with a document
  • Clickable citations
  • Folders
  • Many file types and languages
  • Share by link
  • Desktop app and API
  • Made in the chat
  • Built from your sources
  • Share and comment
  • Tables, charts and diagrams
  • Present or export
  • Scheduled reports
  • AI analyst
  • Code in any cell
  • Database and app connections
  • Large files
  • PDF extraction
  • MCP and API

Pros and cons

AttributeChatPDFClaude Docs & SlidesQuadratic
Pros
  • About as simple as AI tools get
  • No sign-up needed for the basics
  • Citations make answers easy to check
  • Works with Word and PowerPoint files too
  • Has an API
  • No extra subscription if you already use Claude, and Free can try it
  • The document or deck comes out of the same chat that did the research
  • Edit directly or by asking, without copying text into another app
  • Exports to the formats clients and colleagues already use
  • Report and deck stay consistent because they come from one conversation
  • Every AI answer stays as formulas or code you can check and edit
  • Python, SQL, JavaScript and formulas in one grid
  • Direct database connections, no exporting CSVs
  • Handles much larger data sets than Excel or Google Sheets
  • Useful free plan and fair entry price
  • MCP server and API, so Claude can work with your sheets
Cons
  • Free plan is limited to 2 documents a day
  • NotebookLM does more for free
  • Answers can miss details in long or complex documents, so check the citations
  • Paid plan price isn't shown until you upgrade
  • No brand templates in Slides, so decks look generic next to Claude Design or Gamma
  • Rewriting a long doc eats your Claude usage limits quickly, especially on Free and Pro
  • Rough edges on complex formatting, and co-editing and version history are lighter than Google Docs
  • Decks are starting to look recognisably "made by Claude" to clients
  • Sometimes makes a Claude Doc when you wanted a plain Word file, and docs don't flow back into Project knowledge
  • Much more useful if you can read some Python or SQL
  • Overkill if you only need help with the odd formula
  • AI credits run out quickly for heavy users
  • Small community, so fewer templates and tutorials than Excel or Sheets
  • Few independent reviews yet, as it is a newer product

Who each one is for

AttributeChatPDFClaude Docs & SlidesQuadratic
Best for
  • Quick questions about a single PDF
  • Summarising reports and manuals
  • Asking across a folder of documents
  • Sharing a document Q&A with someone
  • Reports and proposals from research
  • Quick internal decks
  • Weekly reports on a schedule
  • SOPs and how-to guides
  • Turning a document into slides
  • Asking big data sets questions in your own words
  • Pulling live data from a company database
  • Python and SQL analysis without a separate notebook
  • Extracting tables from PDFs into a sheet
  • Auditable reports and models
You'll find it used by
  • Students
  • Researchers
  • Small business owners
  • Consultants
  • Office workers
  • Founders
  • Consultants
  • Operations managers
  • Marketers
  • Data analysts
  • Finance teams
  • Founders
  • Operations managers
  • Researchers

Questions people ask

Which is better, ChatPDF, Claude Docs & Slides or Quadratic?

They tie on our overall rating (ChatPDF 3.9/5, Claude Docs & Slides 4.0/5 and Quadratic 4.0/5). ChatPDF is best for quick questions about a single PDF and summarising reports and manuals. Claude Docs & Slides is best for reports and proposals from research and quick internal decks. Quadratic is best for asking big data sets questions in your own words and pulling live data from a company database.

Which is cheaper, ChatPDF, Claude Docs & Slides or Quadratic?

ChatPDF: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at $0. Claude Docs & Slides: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at $20/mo. Quadratic: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at $18/user/mo.

Which is easier to use, ChatPDF, Claude Docs & Slides or Quadratic?

ChatPDF rates highest for ease of use in our scores. Anyone who needs quick answers from a PDF, like a manual, report or contract, without reading the whole thing.

How we compare

Ratings are our own, from using each tool, across ease of use, features, output quality, value for money, speed & reliability.

Swap in another tool

More tools from Presentations & Docs in the library.