Skip to content

Side-by-side comparison · Presentations & Docs

ChatPDF vs Claude Docs & Slides vs Gamma

Everything that matters when choosing between them, in one place: our rating, what each can do, what they cost, and the trade-offs.

ChatPDF

3.9

From $0

Claude Docs & Slides

4.0

From $20/mo

Best overall

Gamma

4.5

Free to start

Comparing 3 tools, the maximum.

At a glance

Pick it if: Anyone who needs quick answers from a PDF, like a manual, report or contract, without reading the whole thing.

Best value

Pick it if: Anyone who already uses Claude and wants the report or deck at the end of the chat, ready to share.

Best overall

Pick it if: Anyone who dreads building slides and would rather start from a finished draft than a blank template.

Gamma scores highest overall, but Claude Docs & Slides gives you more for your money. Which one is right comes down to what you value most.

Overview

AttributeChatPDFClaude Docs & SlidesGamma
In one lineUpload a PDF and ask it questions, with answers that point to the page they came from.Ask Claude for a document or deck, then edit, share and export it without leaving chat.Paste an outline and get a well-designed deck, doc or web page in minutes.
Pricing modelFreemiumFreemiumFreemium
Starting price$0$20/moFree
Free plan Yes Yes Yes
Works with Claude Code Yes Yes Yes

Rating breakdown

Our scores out of 5. The higher bar in each row is highlighted.

AttributeChatPDFClaude Docs & SlidesGamma
Overall rating3.94.04.5Winner
Ease of useHow quickly someone non-technical gets value from it.
5.0
4.5
5.0
FeaturesHow completely it covers its own job, and how well the pieces fit together.
3.5
3.5
4.5
Output qualityHow good the results are before you fix them.
3.5
4.0
4.5
Value for moneyWhat you get for the price, including the free plan.
3.5
4.5
4.0
Speed & reliabilityHow fast it is and how often it falls over.
4.0
3.5
4.5

Feature comparison

A tick means it does this today. A dash means we haven't checked.

AttributeChatPDFClaude Docs & SlidesGamma
Access & platform
Free plan Yes Yes Yes
Mobile app No Yes Yes
Desktop app Yes Yes No
Browser extension No No No
API access Yes– Yes
Teams & business
Team workspace No Yes Yes
Enterprise plan or SSO– Yes Yes
Connects to other apps No Yes Yes
Open source or self-hosted No No No
AI abilities
Works with your files Yes Yes Yes
Understands images– Yes–
Makes images No No Yes
Makes video No No No
Writes code No Yes No
Runs agents or automations No Yes Yes
Learns your brand or style– Yes Yes
Works in many languages Yes Yes Yes
Capabilities score5/ 1712/ 1711/ 17

Pricing

Plans as listed on each vendor's site when we last checked. Confirm before you buy.

AttributeChatPDFClaude Docs & SlidesGamma
Plans

Free

$0

The occasional document.

Free

Free

Trying a document or deck.

Free

Free

Testing whether the output suits you.

PlusOur pick

About $19.99/mo, cheaper billed yearly

People who read lots of documents.

ProOur pick

$20/mo, or $17/mo billed yearly

Anyone making documents or decks most weeks.

PlusOur pick

See website

Individuals who make a few decks a month.

Max

From $100/mo

Heavy users who hit Pro limits.

Pro

See website

People who present weekly or want analytics and the API.

Team

$25/seat/mo, or $20/seat/mo billed yearly

Businesses sharing documents across a team.

Ultra

See website

Heavy users running Gamma all day.

Enterprise

From $20/seat/mo billed yearly, plus usage

Larger organisations needing admin control.

Business

See website

Companies that need admin controls and single sign-on.

Which plan to pickFree is fine for a document or two a day. Before paying for Plus, try NotebookLM, which is free, or use Claude or ChatGPT if you already pay for one.If you already pay for Claude, you have it. Try it on Free first, and move to Pro once you're making more than the odd document, because decks use up a Free allowance fast. Team makes sense when colleagues need to open and comment on the same documents.Use the free credits to make two or three decks and judge the output. If you'll keep using it, Plus is the sensible step because it removes the badge and refreshes credits monthly. Only move to Pro if you want the API, custom domains or viewer analytics.

Key features

AttributeChatPDFClaude Docs & SlidesGamma
Standout features
  • Chat with a document
  • Clickable citations
  • Folders
  • Many file types and languages
  • Share by link
  • Desktop app and API
  • Made in the chat
  • Built from your sources
  • Share and comment
  • Tables, charts and diagrams
  • Present or export
  • Scheduled reports
  • Generate from anything
  • Cards, not slides
  • Gamma Agent
  • Themes and brand kit
  • Export anywhere
  • API and connectors

Pros and cons

AttributeChatPDFClaude Docs & SlidesGamma
Pros
  • About as simple as AI tools get
  • No sign-up needed for the basics
  • Citations make answers easy to check
  • Works with Word and PowerPoint files too
  • Has an API
  • No extra subscription if you already use Claude, and Free can try it
  • The document or deck comes out of the same chat that did the research
  • Edit directly or by asking, without copying text into another app
  • Exports to the formats clients and colleagues already use
  • Report and deck stay consistent because they come from one conversation
  • Fastest route from notes to a presentable deck
  • Designs look polished without any design skill
  • One file works as a deck, document or web page
  • The agent makes rewrites and restyles painless
  • API and connectors mean it fits into automated workflows
Cons
  • Free plan is limited to 2 documents a day
  • NotebookLM does more for free
  • Answers can miss details in long or complex documents, so check the citations
  • Paid plan price isn't shown until you upgrade
  • No brand templates in Slides, so decks look generic next to Claude Design or Gamma
  • Rewriting a long doc eats your Claude usage limits quickly, especially on Free and Pro
  • Rough edges on complex formatting, and co-editing and version history are lighter than Google Docs
  • Decks are starting to look recognisably "made by Claude" to clients
  • Sometimes makes a Claude Doc when you wanted a plain Word file, and docs don't flow back into Project knowledge
  • Free credits are a one-off, so the free plan runs out
  • Hard to keep strictly on brand across many decks
  • Credits drain quickly if you regenerate images often
  • Exports to PowerPoint don't always keep the layout intact

Who each one is for

AttributeChatPDFClaude Docs & SlidesGamma
Best for
  • Quick questions about a single PDF
  • Summarising reports and manuals
  • Asking across a folder of documents
  • Sharing a document Q&A with someone
  • Reports and proposals from research
  • Quick internal decks
  • Weekly reports on a schedule
  • SOPs and how-to guides
  • Turning a document into slides
  • Pitch decks from notes
  • Internal updates and proposals
  • Turning a document into slides
  • Simple one-page websites
You'll find it used by
  • Students
  • Researchers
  • Small business owners
  • Consultants
  • Office workers
  • Founders
  • Consultants
  • Operations managers
  • Marketers
  • Founders
  • Marketers
  • Consultants
  • Sales teams
  • Educators

Questions people ask

Which is better, ChatPDF, Claude Docs & Slides or Gamma?

Gamma scores highest overall in our ratings (ChatPDF 3.9/5, Claude Docs & Slides 4.0/5 and Gamma 4.5/5). ChatPDF is best for quick questions about a single PDF and summarising reports and manuals. Claude Docs & Slides is best for reports and proposals from research and quick internal decks. Gamma is best for pitch decks from notes and internal updates and proposals.

Which is cheaper, ChatPDF, Claude Docs & Slides or Gamma?

ChatPDF: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at $0. Claude Docs & Slides: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at $20/mo. Gamma: It's free to use.

How we compare

Ratings are our own, from using each tool, across ease of use, features, output quality, value for money, speed & reliability.

Swap in another tool

More tools from Presentations & Docs in the library.