Skip to content

Side-by-side comparison · Databases & Backend

Appwrite vs Neon vs Firebase

Everything that matters when choosing between them, in one place: our rating, what each can do, what they cost, and the trade-offs.

Appwrite

3.7

From From $25/mo

Neon

4.0

From Pay as you go

Best overall

Firebase

4.1

From Pay as you go

Comparing 3 tools, the maximum.

At a glance

Appwrite

3.7

Pick it if: Builders who want Firebase-style convenience without being tied to one company's cloud.

Neon

4.0
Best value

Pick it if: Developers and Claude Code users who want a dependable Postgres database and nothing else.

Firebase

4.1
Best overall

Pick it if: Teams building mobile or real-time apps, especially if you already live in Google's world.

Firebase scores highest overall, but Neon gives you more for your money. Which one is right comes down to what you value most.

Overview

AttributeAppwriteNeonFirebase
In one lineAn open-source, all-in-one backend with a database, logins, storage and hosting.A Postgres database that scales to zero when idle, so side projects cost nothing.Google's backend for mobile and web apps, with logins, data and hosting in one.
Pricing modelOpen sourceFreemiumFreemium
Starting priceFrom $25/moPay as you goPay as you go
Free plan Yes Yes Yes
Works with Claude Code Yes Yes Yes

Rating breakdown

Our scores out of 5. The higher bar in each row is highlighted.

AttributeAppwriteNeonFirebase
Overall rating3.74.04.1Winner
Ease of useHow quickly someone non-technical gets value from it.
3.5
3.5
3.5
FeaturesHow much it can do, and how well the pieces fit together.
4.0
3.5
4.5
Output qualityHow good the results are before you fix them.
3.5
4.5
4.0
Value for moneyWhat you get for the price, including the free plan.
4.0
4.5
4.0
Speed & reliabilityHow fast it is and how often it falls over.
3.5
4.0
4.5

Feature comparison

A tick means it does this today. A dash means we haven't checked.

AttributeAppwriteNeonFirebase
Access & platform
Free plan Yes Yes Yes
Mobile app No No No
Desktop app No No No
Browser extension No No No
API access Yes Yes Yes
Teams & business
Team workspace Yes Yes Yes
Enterprise plan or SSO Yes Yes Yes
Connects to other apps Yes Yes Yes
Open source or self-hosted Yes Yes No
AI abilities
Works with your files Yes No Yes
Understands images No No Yes
Makes images No No Yes
Makes video No No No
Writes code Yes Yes Yes
Runs agents or automations Yes No Yes
Learns your brand or style No No No
Works in many languages–––
Capabilities score9/ 177/ 1710/ 17

Pricing

Plans as listed on each vendor's site when we last checked. Confirm before you buy.

AttributeAppwriteNeonFirebase
Plans

Free

Free

Learning and small personal projects.

FreeOur pick

Free

Side projects and learning.

SparkOur pick

Free

Early projects and apps with a small audience.

ProOur pick

From $25/mo

Live apps and small teams.

Launch

Pay as you go, no monthly minimum

Small production apps.

Blaze

Pay as you go, no monthly fee

Anything that might grow past the free quotas.

Enterprise

Custom

Companies with compliance needs.

Scale

Pay as you go, higher rates

Teams needing an SLA and bigger databases.

Self-hosted

Free (your own server costs)

Anyone who wants full control of their data.

Which plan to pickFree is enough to build and show a prototype. Pro at $25 is good value because the price covers your whole team rather than each seat. Self-host only if you already run servers; the time it takes to keep one patched quickly costs more than $25 a month.Free covers more than you'd expect, including several small live apps. Move to Launch when a project needs more than 100 compute hours a month or a longer restore window. Scale is for teams that need an SLA, not for individuals.Spark is enough until real users arrive. Move to Blaze when you need Cloud Functions or you're close to a quota, and set a budget alert the moment you do. There's no middle tier, so your bill goes straight from nothing to usage based.

Key features

AttributeAppwriteNeonFirebase
Standout features
  • Databases
  • Auth
  • Storage and functions
  • Messaging
  • Sites
  • Self-host or Cloud
  • Serverless Postgres
  • Branching
  • Point-in-time restore
  • Official MCP server
  • Neon Auth
  • Firestore
  • Authentication
  • Hosting
  • Cloud Functions
  • Messaging and analytics
  • Firebase MCP server

Pros and cons

AttributeAppwriteNeonFirebase
Pros
  • Everything in one place, including messaging and hosting
  • Open source and self-hostable for free
  • Pro pricing covers the whole team, not per seat
  • Strong mobile and Flutter support
  • Permissions down to the individual record
  • Real Postgres, no lock-in
  • Free plan allows 100 projects
  • Branching is genuinely useful, not a gimmick
  • No monthly minimum on paid plans
  • First-class Vercel integration
  • Battle-tested at huge scale for over a decade
  • The best mobile tooling in this category
  • Live sync and offline support built in
  • Generous free plan with no card required
  • Push notifications, analytics and hosting in one place
Cons
  • Much smaller community and fewer tutorials than Supabase or Firebase
  • Few AI app builders support it out of the box
  • Document database makes SQL-style reporting harder
  • SSO is still marked as coming soon
  • Only the database; no storage, functions or mature auth
  • Cold starts add a delay after a project has been idle
  • Usage billing takes some learning to predict
  • Now owned by Databricks, so the direction could shift
  • Document storage makes reporting and complex queries awkward
  • Usage-based costs can spike with traffic
  • Hard to move off, since nothing else speaks Firestore
  • Google has retired products before, most recently Firebase Studio

Who each one is for

AttributeAppwriteNeonFirebase
Best for
  • Open-source Firebase alternative
  • Self-hosted backends
  • Logins, storage and functions in one place
  • Hosting the front end and backend together
  • Postgres for side projects
  • Safe database experiments with branching
  • Apps hosted on Vercel
  • Usage-based pricing
  • Mobile app backends
  • Live-updating data and chat
  • Sign in with Google or Apple
  • Push notifications
You'll find it used by
  • Developers
  • Flutter developers
  • Open-source fans
  • Privacy-minded teams
  • Developers
  • Vercel users
  • Startups
  • Claude Code users
  • Mobile developers
  • Startups
  • Google shops
  • Hobbyists

How we compare

Ratings are our own, from using each tool, across ease of use, features, output quality, value for money, speed & reliability. The "Visit" buttons may use affiliate links, which never affect a score.

Swap in another tool

More databases & backend tools from the library.