Side-by-side comparison · Sales & Customer Support
Apollo.io vs Decagon vs Hyperbound
Everything that matters when choosing between them, in one place: our rating, what each can do, what they cost, and the trade-offs.
Comparing 3 tools, the maximum.
At a glance
Pick it if: Founders, small sales teams and marketers who need to find B2B contacts and email them.
Pick it if: Large companies with big support teams that want AI to handle most customer chats, emails and calls.
Pick it if: Sales managers and sales training teams onboarding and coaching reps on calls.
Hyperbound scores highest overall, but Apollo.io gives you more for your money. Which one is right comes down to what you value most.
Overview
| Attribute | Apollo.io | Decagon | Hyperbound |
|---|---|---|---|
| In one line | B2B contact database with emails and phone numbers, plus sequences to reach them. | AI agents that answer customer chats, emails and phone calls for large companies. | AI sales role-play: practise cold calls and objections with realistic AI buyers. |
| Pricing model | Freemium | Paid | Freemium |
| Starting price | $49/seat/mo | See website | Free |
| Free plan | Yes | No | Yes |
| Works with Claude Code | Yes | No | No |
Rating breakdown
Our scores out of 5. The higher bar in each row is highlighted.
| Attribute | Apollo.io | Decagon | Hyperbound |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.0 | 3.9 | 4.1Winner |
| Ease of useHow quickly someone non-technical gets value from it. | 4.5 | 3.0 | 4.5 |
| FeaturesHow completely it covers its own job, and how well the pieces fit together. | 4.5 | 4.5 | 4.0 |
| Output qualityHow good the results are before you fix them. | 3.0 | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Value for moneyWhat you get for the price, including the free plan. | 4.0 | 3.0 | 3.5 |
| Speed & reliabilityHow fast it is and how often it falls over. | 4.0 | 4.5 | 4.0 |
Feature comparison
A tick means it does this today. A dash means we haven't checked.
| Attribute | Apollo.io | Decagon | Hyperbound |
|---|---|---|---|
| Access & platform | |||
| Free plan | Yes | No | Yes |
| Mobile app | Yes | No | – |
| Desktop app | – | No | – |
| Browser extension | Yes | No | Yes |
| API access | Yes | – | – |
| Teams & business | |||
| Team workspace | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Enterprise plan or SSO | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Connects to other apps | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Open source or self-hosted | No | No | No |
| AI abilities | |||
| Works with your files | – | Yes | – |
| Understands images | – | – | – |
| Makes images | No | No | No |
| Makes video | No | No | No |
| Writes code | – | No | No |
| Runs agents or automations | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Learns your brand or style | – | Yes | – |
| Works in many languages | – | Yes | – |
| Capabilities score | 8/ 17 | 7/ 17 | 6/ 17 |
Pricing
Plans as listed on each vendor's site when we last checked. Confirm before you buy.
| Attribute | Apollo.io | Decagon | Hyperbound |
|---|---|---|---|
| Plans | Free Free Founders testing outbound. | EnterpriseOur pick Custom Large companies with high support volume. | Free Free Trying AI role-play with a few reps. |
Basic $49/seat/mo billed yearly Individual sellers doing regular outbound. | PracticeOur pick Custom per user Teams that want reps rehearsing on AI. | ||
ProfessionalOur pick $79/seat/mo billed yearly Full-time reps. | Perform Custom per user Teams that also want real calls scored and coached. | ||
Organization $119/seat/mo billed yearly (min 3 seats) Sales teams wanting advanced controls. | |||
| Which plan to pick | Start on Free to check the data covers your market. Basic suits one person prospecting; Professional is worth it if you also call prospects or want AI scoring. Monthly billing costs noticeably more than the yearly prices shown. | There's only one way to buy it: book a demo and get a custom quote. It only makes sense once you handle tens of thousands of support conversations a month. | Run the free role-plays with two or three reps first. If they keep using them, Practice covers rehearsal; only pay for Perform if you do not already have Gong or another call recorder. |
Key features
| Attribute | Apollo.io | Decagon | Hyperbound |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standout features |
|
|
|
Pros and cons
| Attribute | Apollo.io | Decagon | Hyperbound |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pros |
|
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
|
Who each one is for
| Attribute | Apollo.io | Decagon | Hyperbound |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best for |
|
|
|
| You'll find it used by |
|
|
|
Questions people ask
Which is better, Apollo.io, Decagon or Hyperbound?
Hyperbound scores highest overall in our ratings (Apollo.io 4.0/5, Decagon 3.9/5 and Hyperbound 4.1/5). Apollo.io is best for finding business emails and phone numbers and Building B2B lead lists. Decagon is best for automating support at a large consumer brand and AI agents that take real actions in customer accounts. Hyperbound is best for practising cold calls before going live and onboarding new sales reps faster.
Which is cheaper, Apollo.io, Decagon or Hyperbound?
Apollo.io: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at $49/seat/mo. Decagon: Pricing isn't published; check the vendor's site for a quote. Hyperbound: It's free to use.
How we compare
Ratings are our own, from using each tool, across ease of use, features, output quality, value for money, speed & reliability.
Swap in another tool
More tools from Sales & Customer Support in the library.
