Side-by-side comparison · Sales & Customer Support
Apollo.io vs Close vs Decagon
Everything that matters when choosing between them, in one place: our rating, what each can do, what they cost, and the trade-offs.
Comparing 3 tools, the maximum.
At a glance
Pick it if: Founders, small sales teams and marketers who need to find B2B contacts and email them.
Pick it if: Small sales teams and solo sellers who call and email a lot of leads and want it all in one tool.
Pick it if: Large companies with big support teams that want AI to handle most customer chats, emails and calls.
Overview
| Attribute | Apollo.io | Close | Decagon |
|---|---|---|---|
| In one line | B2B contact database with emails and phone numbers, plus sequences to reach them. | Sales CRM with calling, texting and email built in, plus an AI agent that calls leads. | AI agents that answer customer chats, emails and phone calls for large companies. |
| Pricing model | Freemium | Paid | Paid |
| Starting price | $49/seat/mo | $9/user/mo | See website |
| Free plan | Yes | No | No |
| Works with Claude Code | Yes | Yes | No |
Rating breakdown
Our scores out of 5. The higher bar in each row is highlighted.
| Attribute | Apollo.io | Close | Decagon |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.0 | 4.1Winner | 3.9 |
| Ease of useHow quickly someone non-technical gets value from it. | 4.5 | 4.0 | 3.0 |
| FeaturesHow completely it covers its own job, and how well the pieces fit together. | 4.5 | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Output qualityHow good the results are before you fix them. | 3.0 | 4.0 | 4.5 |
| Value for moneyWhat you get for the price, including the free plan. | 4.0 | 4.0 | 3.0 |
| Speed & reliabilityHow fast it is and how often it falls over. | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.5 |
Feature comparison
A tick means it does this today. A dash means we haven't checked.
| Attribute | Apollo.io | Close | Decagon |
|---|---|---|---|
| Access & platform | |||
| Free plan | Yes | No | No |
| Mobile app | Yes | Yes | No |
| Desktop app | – | Yes | No |
| Browser extension | Yes | No | No |
| API access | Yes | Yes | – |
| Teams & business | |||
| Team workspace | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Enterprise plan or SSO | Yes | No | Yes |
| Connects to other apps | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Open source or self-hosted | No | No | No |
| AI abilities | |||
| Works with your files | – | Yes | Yes |
| Understands images | – | – | – |
| Makes images | No | No | No |
| Makes video | No | No | No |
| Writes code | – | No | No |
| Runs agents or automations | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Learns your brand or style | – | No | Yes |
| Works in many languages | – | No | Yes |
| Capabilities score | 8/ 17 | 7/ 17 | 7/ 17 |
Pricing
Plans as listed on each vendor's site when we last checked. Confirm before you buy.
| Attribute | Apollo.io | Close | Decagon |
|---|---|---|---|
| Plans | Free Free Founders testing outbound. | Solo $9/user/mo billed yearly, or $19 monthly One person selling on their own. | EnterpriseOur pick Custom Large companies with high support volume. |
Basic $49/seat/mo billed yearly Individual sellers doing regular outbound. | Essentials $35/user/mo billed yearly, or $49 monthly Small teams sharing leads. | ||
ProfessionalOur pick $79/seat/mo billed yearly Full-time reps. | GrowthOur pick $99/user/mo billed yearly, or $109 monthly Teams that want follow-ups and AI on autopilot. | ||
Organization $119/seat/mo billed yearly (min 3 seats) Sales teams wanting advanced controls. | Scale $139/user/mo billed yearly, or $149 monthly High-volume calling teams. | ||
| Which plan to pick | Start on Free to check the data covers your market. Basic suits one person prospecting; Professional is worth it if you also call prospects or want AI scoring. Monthly billing costs noticeably more than the yearly prices shown. | Take the 14-day trial, which needs no card. Solo is a bargain if you sell alone and follow up by hand. Growth is where Close earns its price, because that's where automated follow-ups, the power dialer and Chloe in workflows start. Budget a little extra each month for call minutes. | There's only one way to buy it: book a demo and get a custom quote. It only makes sense once you handle tens of thousands of support conversations a month. |
Key features
| Attribute | Apollo.io | Close | Decagon |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standout features |
|
|
|
Pros and cons
| Attribute | Apollo.io | Close | Decagon |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pros |
|
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
|
Who each one is for
| Attribute | Apollo.io | Close | Decagon |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best for |
|
|
|
| You'll find it used by |
|
|
|
Questions people ask
Which is better, Apollo.io, Close or Decagon?
Close scores highest overall in our ratings (Apollo.io 4.0/5, Close 4.1/5 and Decagon 3.9/5). Apollo.io is best for finding business emails and phone numbers and Building B2B lead lists. Close is best for calling and texting leads straight from the CRM and following up leads automatically by email and text. Decagon is best for automating support at a large consumer brand and AI agents that take real actions in customer accounts.
Which is cheaper, Apollo.io, Close or Decagon?
Apollo.io: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at $49/seat/mo. Close: There's no free plan. Paid plans start at $9/user/mo. Decagon: Pricing isn't published; check the vendor's site for a quote.
Which is easier to use, Apollo.io, Close or Decagon?
Apollo.io rates highest for ease of use in our scores. Founders, small sales teams and marketers who need to find B2B contacts and email them.
How we compare
Ratings are our own, from using each tool, across ease of use, features, output quality, value for money, speed & reliability.
Swap in another tool
More tools from Sales & Customer Support in the library.
