Skip to content

Side-by-side comparison · Coding & Dev Tools

Amp vs Grok Build vs Warp

Everything that matters when choosing between them, in one place: our rating, what each can do, what they cost, and the trade-offs.

Amp

4.0

From $20/mo

Grok Build

3.5

From $8/mo

Best overall

Warp

4.1

From $20/mo

Comparing 3 tools, the maximum.

At a glance

Amp4.0

Pick it if: Developers and engineering teams working on large codebases who want agents running in the background, not tied to their laptop.

Pick it if: Developers who already pay for an X Subscription or Grok and want a Claude Code-style agent included in it.

Warp4.1
Best overallEasiest to use

Pick it if: Anyone who has to use the terminal but never wanted to learn it.

Overview

AttributeAmpGrok BuildWarp
In one lineA coding agent that keeps working on remote machines after you close your laptop.xAI's open-source terminal coding agent, included in every paid X Subscription plan.A modern terminal where you can type what you want in normal words instead of commands.
Pricing modelFreemiumPaidFreemium
Starting price$20/mo$8/mo$20/mo
Free plan Yes No Yes
Works with Claude Code Yes Yes No

Rating breakdown

Our scores out of 5. The higher bar in each row is highlighted.

AttributeAmpGrok BuildWarp
Overall rating4.03.54.1Winner
Ease of useHow quickly someone non-technical gets value from it.
3.0
3.0
4.5
FeaturesHow completely it covers its own job, and how well the pieces fit together.
4.5
4.0
4.0
Output qualityHow good the results are before you fix them.
4.5
3.5
3.5
Value for moneyWhat you get for the price, including the free plan.
4.0
3.5
4.0
Speed & reliabilityHow fast it is and how often it falls over.
4.0
3.5
4.5

Feature comparison

A tick means it does this today. A dash means we haven't checked.

AttributeAmpGrok BuildWarp
Access & platform
Free plan Yes No Yes
Mobile app Yes No No
Desktop app Yes No Yes
Browser extension No No No
API access Yes Yes–
Teams & business
Team workspace Yes Yes Yes
Enterprise plan or SSO Yes Yes Yes
Connects to other apps Yes Yes Yes
Open source or self-hosted Yes Yes No
AI abilities
Works with your files Yes Yes Yes
Understands images Yes––
Makes images No No No
Makes video No No No
Writes code Yes Yes Yes
Runs agents or automations Yes Yes Yes
Learns your brand or style–– Yes
Works in many languages Yes Yes Yes
Capabilities score13/ 179/ 1710/ 17

Pricing

Plans as listed on each vendor's site when we last checked. Confirm before you buy.

AttributeAmpGrok BuildWarp
Plans

HobbyOur pick

Free

Developers with their own model subscription or keys.

X Subscription Plus

$8/mo

Trying Grok Build alongside Grok and X Premium.

FreeOur pick

Free

Everyone who just wants a better terminal.

Megawatt

$20/mo

Individuals who want Amp to host the machines.

X Subscription PremiumOur pick

$30/mo

Developers who use Grok most days.

Build

$20/mo, or $18/mo billed yearly

People who lean on the Warp agent daily.

Gigawatt

$200/mo

Heavy users running many big jobs.

Super / Ultra

$100/mo or $200/mo

Heavy users running agents all day.

Max

$200/mo, or $180/mo billed yearly

Heavy agent users.

Enterprise

Custom

Large companies with security and compliance needs.

xAI API

Pay as you go

CI pipelines and people who prefer paying per use.

Business

$50/user/mo, or $45/user/mo billed yearly

Teams that need SSO and usage metrics.

Enterprise

Custom

Large organisations.

Which plan to pickStart on Hobby and link a ChatGPT or Claude subscription you already pay for. Move to Megawatt at $20 a month only when you want Amp to host the machines so tasks run while you're away. Teams can create a workspace at no extra charge.If you already pay for X, try it on the plan you have. Premium at $30 a month is the sensible level for regular coding, but if you're choosing a coding agent from scratch, Claude Code or Codex are the safer picks today. Plans changed on 12 October 2026, so check x.ai before you buy.Stay on Free. The terminal is the product, and you can run Claude Code inside it on your Claude subscription without paying Warp anything. Only buy Build if you find yourself using Warp's own agent more than Claude Code.

Key features

AttributeAmpGrok BuildWarp
Standout features
  • Orbs
  • Bring your own model
  • Portals
  • Multiplayer threads
  • Subagents and code review
  • Start from anywhere
  • Full-screen terminal agent
  • Headless mode
  • Skills, plugins and MCP
  • Works in editors
  • Open source
  • Commands in normal words
  • A proper text editor for commands
  • Blocks and searchable history
  • Warp agent
  • Home for other agents
  • Shared workflows

Pros and cons

AttributeAmpGrok BuildWarp
Pros
  • Free when you bring your own model access and machines
  • Background tasks keep running when your laptop is closed
  • Strong reputation on large codebases
  • Sharing, multiplayer and live previews make team review easy
  • Can use your existing ChatGPT or Claude subscription
  • Included in X Subscription plans from $8 a month
  • Open source under Apache 2.0
  • Supports MCP servers, skills, plugins and hooks
  • Headless mode for scripts and CI
  • The best-looking and most forgiving terminal available
  • Typing in normal words removes the biggest barrier for beginners
  • Free for the terminal itself, with your own AI keys allowed
  • Fast, and runs on Mac, Windows and Linux
Cons
  • Orbs, runners and model routing take time to understand
  • Built for developers, not beginners
  • Pricing has changed several times in 2026
  • Hosted orb time beyond your plan costs extra
  • New, with little independent review yet
  • Grok's coding quality hasn't been shown to match Claude or GPT
  • Plans and access rules have changed several times since launch
  • Terminal-first, so less friendly for non-developers
  • Its own agent is a step behind Claude Code and Codex
  • Metered agent usage on paid plans runs out faster than you expect
  • You need an account to use it, which some developers dislike
  • Not an editor, so you still need another tool to browse files

Who each one is for

AttributeAmpGrok BuildWarp
Best for
  • Running several coding tasks in the background at once
  • Working on big, messy codebases
  • Teams sharing and reviewing agent work together
  • Using a ChatGPT or Claude subscription in another agent
  • X Subscription users who want a coding agent included
  • Trying Grok models on real coding work
  • Developers who want an open-source agent they can inspect
  • Running agents in scripts and CI
  • A nicer home for Claude Code
  • Commands in normal words
  • Searchable command history
  • Sharing commands with your team
You'll find it used by
  • Developers
  • Engineering teams
  • Startups
  • Large companies
  • Developers
  • X power users
  • Open-source fans
  • Developers
  • Ops teams
  • Terminal beginners
  • Founders

Questions people ask

Which is better, Amp, Grok Build or Warp?

Warp scores highest overall in our ratings (Amp 4.0/5, Grok Build 3.5/5 and Warp 4.1/5). Amp is best for running several coding tasks in the background at once and working on big, messy codebases. Grok Build is best for X Subscription users who want a coding agent included and Trying Grok models on real coding work. Warp is best for A nicer home for Claude Code and commands in normal words.

Which is cheaper, Amp, Grok Build or Warp?

Amp: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at $20/mo. Grok Build: There's no free plan. Paid plans start at $8/mo. Warp: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at $20/mo.

Which is easier to use, Amp, Grok Build or Warp?

Warp rates highest for ease of use in our scores. Anyone who has to use the terminal but never wanted to learn it.

How we compare

Ratings are our own, from using each tool, across ease of use, features, output quality, value for money, speed & reliability.

Swap in another tool

More tools from Coding & Dev Tools in the library.