Skip to content

Side-by-side comparison · Coding & Dev Tools

Amp vs GitHub Copilot vs Grok Build

Everything that matters when choosing between them, in one place: our rating, what each can do, what they cost, and the trade-offs.

Amp

4.0

From $20/mo

GitHub Copilot

4.0

From $10/mo

Grok Build

3.5

From $8/mo

Comparing 3 tools, the maximum.

At a glance

Amp4.0

Pick it if: Developers and engineering teams working on large codebases who want agents running in the background, not tied to their laptop.

Best valueEasiest to use

Pick it if: Teams and developers whose code lives on GitHub and who want AI in the tools they already use.

Pick it if: Developers who already pay for an X Subscription or Grok and want a Claude Code-style agent included in it.

Overview

AttributeAmpGitHub CopilotGrok Build
In one lineA coding agent that keeps working on remote machines after you close your laptop.GitHub's AI helper: it finishes your code, reviews pull requests and takes on whole tasks.xAI's open-source terminal coding agent, included in every paid X Subscription plan.
Pricing modelFreemiumFreemiumPaid
Starting price$20/mo$10/mo$8/mo
Free plan Yes Yes No
Works with Claude Code Yes No Yes

Rating breakdown

Our scores out of 5. The higher bar in each row is highlighted.

AttributeAmpGitHub CopilotGrok Build
Overall rating4.04.03.5
Ease of useHow quickly someone non-technical gets value from it.
3.0
4.0
3.0
FeaturesHow completely it covers its own job, and how well the pieces fit together.
4.5
4.0
4.0
Output qualityHow good the results are before you fix them.
4.5
3.5
3.5
Value for moneyWhat you get for the price, including the free plan.
4.0
4.5
3.5
Speed & reliabilityHow fast it is and how often it falls over.
4.0
4.0
3.5

Feature comparison

A tick means it does this today. A dash means we haven't checked.

AttributeAmpGitHub CopilotGrok Build
Access & platform
Free plan Yes Yes No
Mobile app Yes Yes No
Desktop app Yes Yes No
Browser extension No– No
API access Yes– Yes
Teams & business
Team workspace Yes Yes Yes
Enterprise plan or SSO Yes Yes Yes
Connects to other apps Yes Yes Yes
Open source or self-hosted Yes No Yes
AI abilities
Works with your files Yes Yes Yes
Understands images Yes Yes–
Makes images No No No
Makes video No No No
Writes code Yes Yes Yes
Runs agents or automations Yes Yes Yes
Learns your brand or style– Yes–
Works in many languages Yes Yes Yes
Capabilities score13/ 1712/ 179/ 17

Pricing

Plans as listed on each vendor's site when we last checked. Confirm before you buy.

AttributeAmpGitHub CopilotGrok Build
Plans

HobbyOur pick

Free

Developers with their own model subscription or keys.

Free

Free

Trying autocomplete and light chat.

X Subscription Plus

$8/mo

Trying Grok Build alongside Grok and X Premium.

Megawatt

$20/mo

Individuals who want Amp to host the machines.

ProOur pick

$10/mo

Individual developers on GitHub.

X Subscription PremiumOur pick

$30/mo

Developers who use Grok most days.

Gigawatt

$200/mo

Heavy users running many big jobs.

Pro+

$39/mo

Developers who run agent tasks every day.

Super / Ultra

$100/mo or $200/mo

Heavy users running agents all day.

Enterprise

Custom

Large companies with security and compliance needs.

Max

$100/mo

Heavy agent-driven work.

xAI API

Pay as you go

CI pipelines and people who prefer paying per use.

Business and Enterprise

See website

Companies that need admin controls and policy management.

Which plan to pickStart on Hobby and link a ChatGPT or Claude subscription you already pay for. Move to Megawatt at $20 a month only when you want Amp to host the machines so tasks run while you're away. Teams can create a workspace at no extra charge.Pro is the sweet spot for an individual: cheap, unlimited autocomplete and enough credits for a few agent tasks a week. Only move to Pro+ if you find yourself buying extra credits every month.If you already pay for X, try it on the plan you have. Premium at $30 a month is the sensible level for regular coding, but if you're choosing a coding agent from scratch, Claude Code or Codex are the safer picks today. Plans changed on 12 October 2026, so check x.ai before you buy.

Key features

AttributeAmpGitHub CopilotGrok Build
Standout features
  • Orbs
  • Bring your own model
  • Portals
  • Multiplayer threads
  • Subagents and code review
  • Start from anywhere
  • Inline suggestions
  • Coding agent
  • Code review
  • Chat everywhere
  • Hand off to other agents
  • Custom instructions
  • Full-screen terminal agent
  • Headless mode
  • Skills, plugins and MCP
  • Works in editors
  • Open source

Pros and cons

AttributeAmpGitHub CopilotGrok Build
Pros
  • Free when you bring your own model access and machines
  • Background tasks keep running when your laptop is closed
  • Strong reputation on large codebases
  • Sharing, multiplayer and live previews make team review easy
  • Can use your existing ChatGPT or Claude subscription
  • The cheapest paid plan in the category with unlimited autocomplete
  • Works inside the editors and the GitHub site you already use
  • Agent and code review are built into the GitHub workflow
  • Admin and security controls for big companies are well developed, because GitHub already had them
  • Included in X Subscription plans from $8 a month
  • Open source under Apache 2.0
  • Supports MCP servers, skills, plugins and hooks
  • Headless mode for scripts and CI
Cons
  • Orbs, runners and model routing take time to understand
  • Built for developers, not beginners
  • Pricing has changed several times in 2026
  • Hosted orb time beyond your plan costs extra
  • Agent quality lags Claude Code and Codex on complex tasks
  • $10 of credits a month disappears quickly once you use agents
  • Pretty pointless if your code is not on GitHub
  • Business and Enterprise prices are not published
  • New, with little independent review yet
  • Grok's coding quality hasn't been shown to match Claude or GPT
  • Plans and access rules have changed several times since launch
  • Terminal-first, so less friendly for non-developers

Who each one is for

AttributeAmpGitHub CopilotGrok Build
Best for
  • Running several coding tasks in the background at once
  • Working on big, messy codebases
  • Teams sharing and reviewing agent work together
  • Using a ChatGPT or Claude subscription in another agent
  • Autocomplete as you type
  • Handing GitHub issues to an agent
  • Automated code review
  • Teams already on GitHub
  • X Subscription users who want a coding agent included
  • Trying Grok models on real coding work
  • Developers who want an open-source agent they can inspect
  • Running agents in scripts and CI
You'll find it used by
  • Developers
  • Engineering teams
  • Startups
  • Large companies
  • Development teams
  • Enterprises
  • Open source maintainers
  • Students
  • Developers
  • X power users
  • Open-source fans

Questions people ask

Which is better, Amp, GitHub Copilot or Grok Build?

They tie on our overall rating (Amp 4.0/5, GitHub Copilot 4.0/5 and Grok Build 3.5/5). Amp is best for running several coding tasks in the background at once and working on big, messy codebases. GitHub Copilot is best for autocomplete as you type and Handing GitHub issues to an agent. Grok Build is best for X Subscription users who want a coding agent included and Trying Grok models on real coding work.

Which is cheaper, Amp, GitHub Copilot or Grok Build?

Amp: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at $20/mo. GitHub Copilot: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at $10/mo. Grok Build: There's no free plan. Paid plans start at $8/mo.

Which is easier to use, Amp, GitHub Copilot or Grok Build?

GitHub Copilot rates highest for ease of use in our scores. Teams and developers whose code lives on GitHub and who want AI in the tools they already use.

How we compare

Ratings are our own, from using each tool, across ease of use, features, output quality, value for money, speed & reliability.

Swap in another tool

More tools from Coding & Dev Tools in the library.