Side-by-side comparison ยท Coding & Dev Tools
Amp vs Claude Code vs GitHub Copilot
Everything that matters when choosing between them, in one place: our rating, what each can do, what they cost, and the trade-offs.
Comparing 3 tools, the maximum.
At a glance
Pick it if: Developers and engineering teams working on large codebases who want agents running in the background, not tied to their laptop.
Pick it if: Anyone building software, from first-timers to senior engineers, who wants an AI that does the work itself.
Pick it if: Teams and developers whose code lives on GitHub and who want AI in the tools they already use.
Claude Code scores highest overall, but GitHub Copilot gives you more for your money. Which one is right comes down to what you value most.
Overview
| Attribute | Amp | Claude Code | GitHub Copilot |
|---|---|---|---|
| In one line | A coding agent that keeps working on remote machines after you close your laptop. | An AI agent that works inside your project: it reads, writes and runs the code for you. | GitHub's AI helper: it finishes your code, reviews pull requests and takes on whole tasks. |
| Pricing model | Freemium | Paid | Freemium |
| Starting price | $20/mo | $20/mo | $10/mo |
| Free plan | Yes | No | Yes |
| Works with Claude Code | Yes | Yes | No |
Rating breakdown
Our scores out of 5. The higher bar in each row is highlighted.
| Attribute | Amp | Claude Code | GitHub Copilot |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.0 | 4.4Winner | 4.0 |
| Ease of useHow quickly someone non-technical gets value from it. | 3.0 | 3.5 | 4.0 |
| FeaturesHow completely it covers its own job, and how well the pieces fit together. | 4.5 | 5.0 | 4.0 |
| Output qualityHow good the results are before you fix them. | 4.5 | 5.0 | 3.5 |
| Value for moneyWhat you get for the price, including the free plan. | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.5 |
| Speed & reliabilityHow fast it is and how often it falls over. | 4.0 | 4.5 | 4.0 |
Feature comparison
A tick means it does this today. A dash means we haven't checked.
| Attribute | Amp | Claude Code | GitHub Copilot |
|---|---|---|---|
| Access & platform | |||
| Free plan | Yes | No | Yes |
| Mobile app | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Desktop app | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Browser extension | No | No | โ |
| API access | Yes | Yes | โ |
| Teams & business | |||
| Team workspace | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Enterprise plan or SSO | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Connects to other apps | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Open source or self-hosted | Yes | No | No |
| AI abilities | |||
| Works with your files | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Understands images | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Makes images | No | No | No |
| Makes video | No | No | No |
| Writes code | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Runs agents or automations | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Learns your brand or style | โ | Yes | Yes |
| Works in many languages | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Capabilities score | 13/ 17 | 12/ 17 | 12/ 17 |
Pricing
Plans as listed on each vendor's site when we last checked. Confirm before you buy.
| Attribute | Amp | Claude Code | GitHub Copilot |
|---|---|---|---|
| Plans | HobbyOur pick Free Developers with their own model subscription or keys. | ProOur pick $20/mo, or $17/mo billed yearly Trying Claude Code and light daily use. | Free Free Trying autocomplete and light chat. |
Megawatt $20/mo Individuals who want Amp to host the machines. | Team From $20/seat/mo billed yearly, or $25 monthly Businesses with 2 to 150 people who want central billing. | ProOur pick $10/mo Individual developers on GitHub. | |
Gigawatt $200/mo Heavy users running many big jobs. | Enterprise $20/seat/mo billed yearly, 20-seat minimum Larger companies with compliance needs. | Pro+ $39/mo Developers who run agent tasks every day. | |
Enterprise Custom Large companies with security and compliance needs. | Max From $100/mo Anyone running Claude Code for hours a day. | Max $100/mo Heavy agent-driven work. | |
API (pay as you go) Usage based Teams who want to pay only for what they use. | Business and Enterprise See website Companies that need admin controls and policy management. | ||
| Which plan to pick | Start on Hobby and link a ChatGPT or Claude subscription you already pay for. Move to Megawatt at $20 a month only when you want Amp to host the machines so tasks run while you're away. Teams can create a workspace at no extra charge. | Start on Pro. It is enough to build a small site or tool in evenings and weekends. If you hit the limit most days, Max 5x is the next step; it costs five times as much but usually works out cheaper than paying for the API directly. Max also lets you spend up to half your weekly limit on Fable, which Pro only gets through paid credits. | Pro is the sweet spot for an individual: cheap, unlimited autocomplete and enough credits for a few agent tasks a week. Only move to Pro+ if you find yourself buying extra credits every month. |
Key features
| Attribute | Amp | Claude Code | GitHub Copilot |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standout features |
|
|
|
Pros and cons
| Attribute | Amp | Claude Code | GitHub Copilot |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pros |
|
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
|
Who each one is for
| Attribute | Amp | Claude Code | GitHub Copilot |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best for |
|
|
|
| You'll find it used by |
|
|
|
Questions people ask
Which is better, Amp, Claude Code or GitHub Copilot?
Claude Code scores highest overall in our ratings (Amp 4.0/5, Claude Code 4.4/5 and GitHub Copilot 4.0/5). Amp is best for running several coding tasks in the background at once and working on big, messy codebases. Claude Code is best for building a whole feature, start to finish and fixing bugs you can't find. GitHub Copilot is best for autocomplete as you type and Handing GitHub issues to an agent.
Which is cheaper, Amp, Claude Code or GitHub Copilot?
Amp: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at $20/mo. Claude Code: There's no free plan. Paid plans start at $20/mo. GitHub Copilot: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at $10/mo.
Which is easier to use, Amp, Claude Code or GitHub Copilot?
GitHub Copilot rates highest for ease of use in our scores. Teams and developers whose code lives on GitHub and who want AI in the tools they already use.
How we compare
Ratings are our own, from using each tool, across ease of use, features, output quality, value for money, speed & reliability.
Swap in another tool
More tools from Coding & Dev Tools in the library.



