Side-by-side comparison · Coding & Dev Tools
Amp vs CodeRabbit vs Warp
Everything that matters when choosing between them, in one place: our rating, what each can do, what they cost, and the trade-offs.
Comparing 3 tools, the maximum.
At a glance
Pick it if: Developers and engineering teams working on large codebases who want agents running in the background, not tied to their laptop.
Pick it if: Teams and solo builders shipping code through GitHub or GitLab, especially those letting AI agents write most of it.
Overview
| Attribute | Amp | CodeRabbit | Warp |
|---|---|---|---|
| In one line | A coding agent that keeps working on remote machines after you close your laptop. | AI that reviews every code change on GitHub and flags bugs before they go live. | A modern terminal where you can type what you want in normal words instead of commands. |
| Pricing model | Freemium | Freemium | Freemium |
| Starting price | $20/mo | $24/dev/mo | $20/mo |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Works with Claude Code | Yes | Yes | No |
Rating breakdown
Our scores out of 5. The higher bar in each row is highlighted.
| Attribute | Amp | CodeRabbit | Warp |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.0 | 3.9 | 4.1Winner |
| Ease of useHow quickly someone non-technical gets value from it. | 3.0 | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| FeaturesHow completely it covers its own job, and how well the pieces fit together. | 4.5 | 4.5 | 4.0 |
| Output qualityHow good the results are before you fix them. | 4.5 | 4.0 | 3.5 |
| Value for moneyWhat you get for the price, including the free plan. | 4.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 |
| Speed & reliabilityHow fast it is and how often it falls over. | 4.0 | 3.5 | 4.5 |
Feature comparison
A tick means it does this today. A dash means we haven't checked.
| Attribute | Amp | CodeRabbit | Warp |
|---|---|---|---|
| Access & platform | |||
| Free plan | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile app | Yes | No | No |
| Desktop app | Yes | No | Yes |
| Browser extension | No | No | No |
| API access | Yes | Yes | – |
| Teams & business | |||
| Team workspace | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Enterprise plan or SSO | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Connects to other apps | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Open source or self-hosted | Yes | – | No |
| AI abilities | |||
| Works with your files | Yes | No | Yes |
| Understands images | Yes | No | – |
| Makes images | No | No | No |
| Makes video | No | No | No |
| Writes code | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Runs agents or automations | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Learns your brand or style | – | Yes | Yes |
| Works in many languages | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Capabilities score | 13/ 17 | 9/ 17 | 10/ 17 |
Pricing
Plans as listed on each vendor's site when we last checked. Confirm before you buy.
| Attribute | Amp | CodeRabbit | Warp |
|---|---|---|---|
| Plans | HobbyOur pick Free Developers with their own model subscription or keys. | Free Free Open-source projects and trying it out. | FreeOur pick Free Everyone who just wants a better terminal. |
Megawatt $20/mo Individuals who want Amp to host the machines. | EssentialsOur pick $24/dev/mo billed yearly, or $30 monthly Small teams who want every pull request reviewed. | Build $20/mo, or $18/mo billed yearly People who lean on the Warp agent daily. | |
Gigawatt $200/mo Heavy users running many big jobs. | Team $48/dev/mo billed yearly, or $60 monthly Busier teams with many open pull requests. | Max $200/mo, or $180/mo billed yearly Heavy agent users. | |
Enterprise Custom Large companies with security and compliance needs. | Advanced $72/dev/mo billed yearly, or $90 monthly Teams that want security monitoring. | Business $50/user/mo, or $45/user/mo billed yearly Teams that need SSO and usage metrics. | |
Enterprise Custom Large organisations. | Enterprise Custom Large organisations. | ||
| Which plan to pick | Start on Hobby and link a ChatGPT or Claude subscription you already pay for. Move to Megawatt at $20 a month only when you want Amp to host the machines so tasks run while you're away. Teams can create a workspace at no extra charge. | Start with the 14-day trial. Essentials is enough for most small teams; you only pay for developers who open pull requests. Turn on usage-based reviews ($0.25 a file) with a monthly cap if you keep hitting the hourly limit. | Stay on Free. The terminal is the product, and you can run Claude Code inside it on your Claude subscription without paying Warp anything. Only buy Build if you find yourself using Warp's own agent more than Claude Code. |
Key features
| Attribute | Amp | CodeRabbit | Warp |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standout features |
|
|
|
Pros and cons
| Attribute | Amp | CodeRabbit | Warp |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pros |
|
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
|
Who each one is for
| Attribute | Amp | CodeRabbit | Warp |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best for |
|
|
|
| You'll find it used by |
|
|
|
Questions people ask
Which is better, Amp, CodeRabbit or Warp?
Warp scores highest overall in our ratings (Amp 4.0/5, CodeRabbit 3.9/5 and Warp 4.1/5). Amp is best for running several coding tasks in the background at once and working on big, messy codebases. CodeRabbit is best for Reviewing AI-written code before it ships and small teams without a senior reviewer. Warp is best for A nicer home for Claude Code and commands in normal words.
Which is cheaper, Amp, CodeRabbit or Warp?
Amp: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at $20/mo. CodeRabbit: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at $24/dev/mo. Warp: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at $20/mo.
How we compare
Ratings are our own, from using each tool, across ease of use, features, output quality, value for money, speed & reliability.
Swap in another tool
More tools from Coding & Dev Tools in the library.
