Side-by-side comparison · Coding & Dev Tools
Amp vs CodeRabbit vs OpenAI Codex
Everything that matters when choosing between them, in one place: our rating, what each can do, what they cost, and the trade-offs.
Comparing 3 tools, the maximum.
At a glance
Pick it if: Developers and engineering teams working on large codebases who want agents running in the background, not tied to their laptop.
Pick it if: Teams and solo builders shipping code through GitHub or GitLab, especially those letting AI agents write most of it.
Pick it if: ChatGPT subscribers who want a coding agent without paying for a second subscription.
Overview
| Attribute | Amp | CodeRabbit | OpenAI Codex |
|---|---|---|---|
| In one line | A coding agent that keeps working on remote machines after you close your laptop. | AI that reviews every code change on GitHub and flags bugs before they go live. | OpenAI's coding agent. Hand it a task and it works away while you do other things. |
| Pricing model | Freemium | Freemium | Freemium |
| Starting price | $20/mo | $24/dev/mo | $8/mo |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Works with Claude Code | Yes | Yes | No |
Rating breakdown
Our scores out of 5. The higher bar in each row is highlighted.
| Attribute | Amp | CodeRabbit | OpenAI Codex |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.0 | 3.9 | 4.2Winner |
| Ease of useHow quickly someone non-technical gets value from it. | 3.0 | 4.5 | 3.5 |
| FeaturesHow completely it covers its own job, and how well the pieces fit together. | 4.5 | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Output qualityHow good the results are before you fix them. | 4.5 | 4.0 | 4.5 |
| Value for moneyWhat you get for the price, including the free plan. | 4.0 | 3.0 | 4.5 |
| Speed & reliabilityHow fast it is and how often it falls over. | 4.0 | 3.5 | 4.0 |
Feature comparison
A tick means it does this today. A dash means we haven't checked.
| Attribute | Amp | CodeRabbit | OpenAI Codex |
|---|---|---|---|
| Access & platform | |||
| Free plan | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile app | Yes | No | Yes |
| Desktop app | Yes | No | Yes |
| Browser extension | No | No | No |
| API access | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Teams & business | |||
| Team workspace | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Enterprise plan or SSO | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Connects to other apps | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Open source or self-hosted | Yes | – | Yes |
| AI abilities | |||
| Works with your files | Yes | No | Yes |
| Understands images | Yes | No | Yes |
| Makes images | No | No | No |
| Makes video | No | No | No |
| Writes code | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Runs agents or automations | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Learns your brand or style | – | Yes | Yes |
| Works in many languages | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Capabilities score | 13/ 17 | 9/ 17 | 14/ 17 |
Pricing
Plans as listed on each vendor's site when we last checked. Confirm before you buy.
| Attribute | Amp | CodeRabbit | OpenAI Codex |
|---|---|---|---|
| Plans | HobbyOur pick Free Developers with their own model subscription or keys. | Free Free Open-source projects and trying it out. | Free Free A quick look at what it can do. |
Megawatt $20/mo Individuals who want Amp to host the machines. | EssentialsOur pick $24/dev/mo billed yearly, or $30 monthly Small teams who want every pull request reviewed. | Go $8/mo Occasional light tasks. | |
Gigawatt $200/mo Heavy users running many big jobs. | Team $48/dev/mo billed yearly, or $60 monthly Busier teams with many open pull requests. | PlusOur pick $20/mo Anyone who already pays for ChatGPT. | |
Enterprise Custom Large companies with security and compliance needs. | Advanced $72/dev/mo billed yearly, or $90 monthly Teams that want security monitoring. | Pro From $100/mo Developers who hit the Plus limits. | |
Enterprise Custom Large organisations. | Business $20/user/mo billed yearly, or $25 monthly Teams of 2 or more. | ||
Enterprise Custom Large organisations. | |||
| Which plan to pick | Start on Hobby and link a ChatGPT or Claude subscription you already pay for. Move to Megawatt at $20 a month only when you want Amp to host the machines so tasks run while you're away. Teams can create a workspace at no extra charge. | Start with the 14-day trial. Essentials is enough for most small teams; you only pay for developers who open pull requests. Turn on usage-based reviews ($0.25 a file) with a monthly cap if you keep hitting the hourly limit. | If you already have ChatGPT Plus, you have Codex: just try it. If you are choosing between this and Claude Code with no existing subscription, Plus at $20 and Claude Pro at $20 cost the same, so pick whichever chat assistant you prefer. If you outgrow Plus, Pro starts at $100 and has no five-hour limit for now. The $200 tier gives new subscribers less usage than it used to, and Ultrafast mode is only on the $500 tier. |
Key features
| Attribute | Amp | CodeRabbit | OpenAI Codex |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standout features |
|
|
|
Pros and cons
| Attribute | Amp | CodeRabbit | OpenAI Codex |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pros |
|
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
|
Who each one is for
| Attribute | Amp | CodeRabbit | OpenAI Codex |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best for |
|
|
|
| You'll find it used by |
|
|
|
Questions people ask
Which is better, Amp, CodeRabbit or OpenAI Codex?
OpenAI Codex scores highest overall in our ratings (Amp 4.0/5, CodeRabbit 3.9/5 and OpenAI Codex 4.2/5). Amp is best for running several coding tasks in the background at once and working on big, messy codebases. CodeRabbit is best for Reviewing AI-written code before it ships and small teams without a senior reviewer. OpenAI Codex is best for background tasks in the cloud and starting a task from your phone.
Which is cheaper, Amp, CodeRabbit or OpenAI Codex?
Amp: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at $20/mo. CodeRabbit: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at $24/dev/mo. OpenAI Codex: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at $8/mo.
Which is easier to use, Amp, CodeRabbit or OpenAI Codex?
CodeRabbit rates highest for ease of use in our scores. Teams and solo builders shipping code through GitHub or GitLab, especially those letting AI agents write most of it.
How we compare
Ratings are our own, from using each tool, across ease of use, features, output quality, value for money, speed & reliability.
Swap in another tool
More tools from Coding & Dev Tools in the library.
