Side-by-side comparison · Automation & Workflows
Activepieces vs Parseur vs Relevance AI
Everything that matters when choosing between them, in one place: our rating, what each can do, what they cost, and the trade-offs.
Comparing 3 tools, the maximum.
At a glance
Pick it if: Small teams who like how Zapier works but want to own their automations or avoid per-task pricing.
Pick it if: Small businesses and operations teams that copy details from the same kinds of email or PDF into spreadsheets or other apps.
Pick it if: Sales and revenue operations teams at growing companies who want AI agents doing research, prep and admin.
Parseur scores highest overall, but Activepieces gives you more for your money. Which one is right comes down to what you value most.
Overview
| Attribute | Activepieces | Parseur | Relevance AI |
|---|---|---|---|
| In one line | A Zapier-style automation builder that's open source and charges per run, not per step. | Pulls data out of emails and PDFs into your spreadsheets and apps. | Build a team of AI agents for sales, support and ops work, without writing code. |
| Pricing model | Open source | Freemium | Paid |
| Starting price | $20/mo flat | $49/mo | See website |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes | No |
| Works with Claude Code | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Rating breakdown
Our scores out of 5. The higher bar in each row is highlighted.
| Attribute | Activepieces | Parseur | Relevance AI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.0 | 4.1Winner | 3.7 |
| Ease of useHow quickly someone non-technical gets value from it. | 4.0 | 4.5 | 3.5 |
| FeaturesHow completely it covers its own job, and how well the pieces fit together. | 3.5 | 4.0 | 4.5 |
| Output qualityHow good the results are before you fix them. | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| Value for moneyWhat you get for the price, including the free plan. | 4.5 | 3.5 | 3.0 |
| Speed & reliabilityHow fast it is and how often it falls over. | 4.0 | 4.5 | 3.5 |
Feature comparison
A tick means it does this today. A dash means we haven't checked.
| Attribute | Activepieces | Parseur | Relevance AI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Access & platform | |||
| Free plan | Yes | Yes | No |
| Mobile app | No | – | – |
| Desktop app | No | – | – |
| Browser extension | No | – | – |
| API access | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Teams & business | |||
| Team workspace | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Enterprise plan or SSO | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Connects to other apps | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Open source or self-hosted | Yes | – | No |
| AI abilities | |||
| Works with your files | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Understands images | – | – | – |
| Makes images | No | No | No |
| Makes video | No | No | No |
| Writes code | Yes | No | – |
| Runs agents or automations | Yes | No | Yes |
| Learns your brand or style | No | – | – |
| Works in many languages | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Capabilities score | 10/ 17 | 7/ 17 | 7/ 17 |
Pricing
Plans as listed on each vendor's site when we last checked. Confirm before you buy.
| Attribute | Activepieces | Parseur | Relevance AI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Plans | Free Free Small teams getting started, or anyone who will self-host. | Free Free Trying it on a handful of documents. | EnterpriseOur pick Custom Teams rolling out agents across a department. |
PlusOur pick $20/mo flat A small business running automations every day. | Micro $49/mo, or $468/yr A small business with a trickle of documents. | ||
Team $200/mo flat A larger team that needs SSO and roles. | StarterOur pick $129/mo, or $1,188/yr Teams processing a few dozen documents a day. | ||
Ultimate Custom Companies with heavy volume or strict security needs. | Pro $499/mo, or $4,788/yr Operations teams with high volume. | ||
Enterprise Custom Very high volume or custom contract terms. | |||
| Which plan to pick | The Free plan is unusually generous, so start there. Move to Plus when you want monthly credits instead of a daily cap and the option to use your own AI keys. Self-host only if someone on the team is happy running a server. | Use Free to prove it can read your documents, then pick the plan that matches your monthly page count. Starter is where the cost per page becomes reasonable; yearly billing knocks roughly a quarter off. | There is only one public option now: talk to sales for an Enterprise quote. Ask for a usage cap and clear reporting on credit spend in the contract. |
Key features
| Attribute | Activepieces | Parseur | Relevance AI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standout features |
|
|
|
Pros and cons
| Attribute | Activepieces | Parseur | Relevance AI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pros |
|
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
|
Who each one is for
| Attribute | Activepieces | Parseur | Relevance AI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best for |
|
|
|
| You'll find it used by |
|
|
|
Questions people ask
Which is better, Activepieces, Parseur or Relevance AI?
Parseur scores highest overall in our ratings (Activepieces 4.0/5, Parseur 4.1/5 and Relevance AI 3.7/5). Activepieces is best for zapier-style automations on a budget and Giving AI assistants access to your apps. Parseur is best for order and booking emails into a spreadsheet and lead notification emails into a CRM. Relevance AI is best for sales research and meeting prep and post-call follow-ups and CRM updates.
Which is cheaper, Activepieces, Parseur or Relevance AI?
Activepieces: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at $20/mo flat. Parseur: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at $49/mo. Relevance AI: Pricing isn't published; check the vendor's site for a quote.
Which is easier to use, Activepieces, Parseur or Relevance AI?
Parseur rates highest for ease of use in our scores. Small businesses and operations teams that copy details from the same kinds of email or PDF into spreadsheets or other apps.
How we compare
Ratings are our own, from using each tool, across ease of use, features, output quality, value for money, speed & reliability.
Swap in another tool
More tools from Automation & Workflows in the library.
