Side-by-side comparison · Automation & Workflows
Make vs Parabola vs Power Automate
Everything that matters when choosing between them, in one place: our rating, what each can do, what they cost, and the trade-offs.
Comparing 3 tools, the maximum.
At a glance
Pick it if: Marketers and operators who've outgrown simple automations and want to see what their workflows are doing.
Pick it if: Operations and finance teams at ecommerce and logistics businesses who live in spreadsheets.
Pick it if: Offices that already run on Microsoft 365 and want approvals, email handling and file admin to happen on their own.
Overview
| Attribute | Make | Parabola | Power Automate |
|---|---|---|---|
| In one line | Draw automations as a flowchart, with branches and loops, for less than Zapier charges. | Automates messy operations data jobs like reconciliations, reports and invoice audits. | Microsoft's automation tool: links Outlook, Teams, Excel and more so busywork runs itself. |
| Pricing model | Freemium | Freemium | Freemium |
| Starting price | From $9/mo | Free | Included in most business plans |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Works with Claude Code | Yes | No | Yes |
Rating breakdown
Our scores out of 5. The higher bar in each row is highlighted.
| Attribute | Make | Parabola | Power Automate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.3Winner | 4.0 | 3.8 |
| Ease of useHow quickly someone non-technical gets value from it. | 4.0 | 3.5 | 3.0 |
| FeaturesHow completely it covers its own job, and how well the pieces fit together. | 4.5 | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Output qualityHow good the results are before you fix them. | 4.5 | 4.5 | 4.0 |
| Value for moneyWhat you get for the price, including the free plan. | 4.5 | 3.5 | 4.0 |
| Speed & reliabilityHow fast it is and how often it falls over. | 4.0 | 4.0 | 3.5 |
Feature comparison
A tick means it does this today. A dash means we haven't checked.
| Attribute | Make | Parabola | Power Automate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Access & platform | |||
| Free plan | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile app | – | – | Yes |
| Desktop app | No | – | Yes |
| Browser extension | Yes | – | Yes |
| API access | Yes | – | Yes |
| Teams & business | |||
| Team workspace | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Enterprise plan or SSO | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Connects to other apps | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Open source or self-hosted | No | No | No |
| AI abilities | |||
| Works with your files | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Understands images | – | – | – |
| Makes images | No | No | No |
| Makes video | No | No | No |
| Writes code | No | – | No |
| Runs agents or automations | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Learns your brand or style | No | – | No |
| Works in many languages | Yes | – | Yes |
| Capabilities score | 9/ 17 | 6/ 17 | 11/ 17 |
Pricing
Plans as listed on each vendor's site when we last checked. Confirm before you buy.
| Attribute | Make | Parabola | Power Automate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Plans | Free Free Learning the canvas and running a couple of light scenarios. | BasicOur pick Free One person automating their own reports. | Included with Microsoft 365 Included in most business plans Offices that only need flows between Microsoft apps. |
CoreOur pick From $9/mo billed yearly One person automating a small business. | Business Custom Operations and finance teams. | PremiumOur pick $15 per user/mo, billed yearly People who need flows that reach apps outside Microsoft. | |
Pro From $16/mo billed yearly Anyone whose automations have become business-critical. | Process $150 per bot/mo, billed yearly Businesses running one key process all day without a person watching. | ||
Teams From $29/mo billed yearly A team sharing scenarios and connections. | Hosted Process $215 per bot/mo, billed yearly Teams that want the bot on a virtual machine Microsoft manages. | ||
Enterprise Custom Companies that need SSO, audit logs and an uptime guarantee. | |||
| Which plan to pick | Core is enough for most small businesses. 10,000 credits goes a long way, because the steps that split a scenario or catch errors don't use any. Move to Pro if a failed run costs you money, since it runs your scenarios first in the queue and keeps better logs. | Start on the free Basic plan to rebuild one report you do every week. If the team needs to share and govern Flows, ask for a Business proof of concept, which is free if it doesn't prove value. | Start with what your Microsoft 365 plan already gives you. Most small offices never need more. Buy Premium only for the people whose flows need an app outside Microsoft's standard list. Process and Hosted Process are for bigger companies running bots around the clock. Prices vary by country. |
Key features
| Attribute | Make | Parabola | Power Automate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standout features |
|
|
|
Pros and cons
| Attribute | Make | Parabola | Power Automate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pros |
|
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
|
Who each one is for
| Attribute | Make | Parabola | Power Automate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best for |
|
|
|
| You'll find it used by |
|
|
|
Questions people ask
Which is better, Make, Parabola or Power Automate?
Make scores highest overall in our ratings (Make 4.3/5, Parabola 4.0/5 and Power Automate 3.8/5). Make is best for multi-step marketing workflows and branching logic and filters. Parabola is best for inventory and order reconciliation and shipping and parcel invoice audits. Power Automate is best for approvals that run through Teams or Outlook and filing email attachments into OneDrive or SharePoint.
Which is cheaper, Make, Parabola or Power Automate?
Make: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at From $9/mo. Parabola: It's free to use. Power Automate: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at Included in most business plans.
Which is easier to use, Make, Parabola or Power Automate?
Make rates highest for ease of use in our scores. Marketers and operators who've outgrown simple automations and want to see what their workflows are doing.
How we compare
Ratings are our own, from using each tool, across ease of use, features, output quality, value for money, speed & reliability.
Swap in another tool
More tools from Automation & Workflows in the library.
