Side-by-side comparison · Automation & Workflows

Make vs Nanonets

Everything that matters when choosing between them, in one place: our rating, what each can do, what they cost, and the trade-offs.

Best overall

Make

4.3

From From $9/mo

Details Visit

Nanonets

3.7

From $50 free credits

Details Visit

Comparing 2 tools. Add one more if you like.

At a glance

Make4.3

Best overallBest valueEasiest to use

Pick it if: Marketers and operators who've outgrown simple automations and want to see what their workflows are doing.

Nanonets3.7

Pick it if: Finance and operations teams buried in invoices, receipts and forms that someone still types into the books by hand.

Overview

Attribute	Make	Nanonets
In one line	Draw automations as a flowchart, with branches and loops, for less than Zapier charges.	Pulls data out of invoices, receipts and forms and sends it into your accounting system.
Pricing model	Freemium	Paid
Starting price	From $9/mo	$50 free credits
Free plan	Yes	No
Works with Claude Code	Yes	Yes

Rating breakdown

Our scores out of 5. The higher bar in each row is highlighted.

Attribute	Make	Nanonets
Overall rating	4.3Winner	3.7
Ease of useHow quickly someone non-technical gets value from it.	4.0	3.5
FeaturesHow completely it covers its own job, and how well the pieces fit together.	4.5	4.5
Output qualityHow good the results are before you fix them.	4.5	4.0
Value for moneyWhat you get for the price, including the free plan.	4.5	3.0
Speed & reliabilityHow fast it is and how often it falls over.	4.0	3.5

Feature comparison

A tick means it does this today. A dash means we haven't checked.

Attribute	Make	Nanonets
Access & platform
Free plan	Yes	No
Mobile app	–	–
Desktop app	No	–
Browser extension	Yes	–
API access	Yes	Yes
Teams & business
Team workspace	Yes	Yes
Enterprise plan or SSO	Yes	Yes
Connects to other apps	Yes	Yes
Open source or self-hosted	No	–
AI abilities
Works with your files	Yes	Yes
Understands images	–	Yes
Makes images	No	No
Makes video	No	No
Writes code	No	–
Runs agents or automations	Yes	Yes
Learns your brand or style	No	–
Works in many languages	Yes	Yes
Capabilities score	9/ 17	8/ 17

Pricing

Plans as listed on each vendor's site when we last checked. Confirm before you buy.

Attribute	Make	Nanonets
Plans	Free Free Learning the canvas and running a couple of light scenarios.	StarterOur pick $50 free credits, then pay as you go Small teams testing it or running modest volumes.
	CoreOur pick From $9/mo billed yearly One person automating a small business.	Growth Custom Finance teams with steady monthly volume.
	Pro From $16/mo billed yearly Anyone whose automations have become business-critical.	Enterprise Custom Large or regulated organisations.
	Teams From $29/mo billed yearly A team sharing scenarios and connections.
	Enterprise Custom Companies that need SSO, audit logs and an uptime guarantee.
Which plan to pick	Core is enough for most small businesses, and 10,000 credits goes a long way when routers and error handlers are free. Move to Pro if a failed run costs you money and you want priority execution and better logs.	Start on Starter with the free credits and push a month's worth of your real invoices through it. Only talk to sales about Growth once you know your volume and which accounting system it has to feed.

Key features

Attribute	Make	Nanonets
Standout features	Visual canvas Routers, filters and iterators Run history you can replay AI Agents Make Grid HTTP and webhooks	AI data extraction Workflow blocks Human review Many ways in Accounting and ERP exports

Pros and cons

Attribute	Make	Nanonets
Pros	Much cheaper per step than Zapier Branching, loops and filters are built in, not bolted on Run history shows exactly what happened at every step Routers and error handlers do not use credits Generous free plan for learning	Reads messy scans and varied layouts without building templates Covers the whole flow: capture, checks, approval and export Free starting credits with no card Wide range of accounting and ERP connections Human review step keeps errors out of the books
Cons	Steeper learning curve than Zapier, especially around data mapping Credit usage is hard to predict until you have run a scenario for a while Fewer apps than Zapier, and some apps have thin coverage Pricing page is hard to read, and the headline prices assume yearly billing	Usage pricing per block makes the monthly bill hard to predict Some long-time users report accuracy dropping on new layouts and fiddly retraining Processing speed can vary a lot between batches Anything past the starter tier is a sales quote, and a few users report hard refund disputes

Who each one is for

Attribute	Make	Nanonets
Best for	Multi-step marketing workflows Branching logic and filters Processing batches of records Automation on a budget	Accounts payable invoice capture Receipts and expense documents Bank statements and financial forms Approval workflows with a human check Getting PDF data into Xero, QuickBooks or NetSuite
You'll find it used by	Marketers Ops teams Agencies Consultants	Accounts payable teams Bookkeepers Finance managers Operations teams Logistics companies

Questions people ask

Which is better, Make or Nanonets?

Make scores highest overall in our ratings (Make 4.3/5 and Nanonets 3.7/5). Make is best for multi-step marketing workflows and branching logic and filters. Nanonets is best for accounts payable invoice capture and receipts and expense documents.

Which is cheaper, Make or Nanonets?

Make: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at From $9/mo. Nanonets: There's no free plan. Paid plans start at $50 free credits.

Which is easier to use, Make or Nanonets?

Make rates highest for ease of use in our scores. Marketers and operators who've outgrown simple automations and want to see what their workflows are doing.

Ratings are our own, from using each tool, across ease of use, features, output quality, value for money, speed & reliability.

Swap in another tool

More tools from Automation & Workflows in the library.