Skip to content

Side-by-side comparison · Automation & Workflows

Make vs n8n vs Nanonets

Everything that matters when choosing between them, in one place: our rating, what each can do, what they cost, and the trade-offs.

Make

4.3

From From $9/mo

Best overall

n8n

4.5

From €20/mo

Nanonets

3.7

From $50 free credits

Comparing 3 tools, the maximum.

At a glance

Make4.3
Easiest to use

Pick it if: Marketers and operators who've outgrown simple automations and want to see what their workflows are doing.

n8n4.5
Best overallBest value

Pick it if: Teams that want full control of their data and automations, or anyone building AI agents on a budget who doesn't mind getting a bit technical.

Pick it if: Finance and operations teams buried in invoices, receipts and forms that someone still types into the books by hand.

Overview

AttributeMaken8nNanonets
In one lineDraw automations as a flowchart, with branches and loops, for less than Zapier charges.Build automations and AI agents on a visual canvas, then host them yourself for free.Pulls data out of invoices, receipts and forms and sends it into your accounting system.
Pricing modelFreemiumOpen sourcePaid
Starting priceFrom $9/mo€20/mo$50 free credits
Free plan Yes Yes No
Works with Claude Code Yes Yes Yes

Rating breakdown

Our scores out of 5. The higher bar in each row is highlighted.

AttributeMaken8nNanonets
Overall rating4.34.5Winner3.7
Ease of useHow quickly someone non-technical gets value from it.
4.0
3.5
3.5
FeaturesHow completely it covers its own job, and how well the pieces fit together.
4.5
5.0
4.5
Output qualityHow good the results are before you fix them.
4.5
4.5
4.0
Value for moneyWhat you get for the price, including the free plan.
4.5
5.0
3.0
Speed & reliabilityHow fast it is and how often it falls over.
4.0
4.5
3.5

Feature comparison

A tick means it does this today. A dash means we haven't checked.

AttributeMaken8nNanonets
Access & platform
Free plan Yes Yes No
Mobile app– No–
Desktop app No No–
Browser extension Yes No–
API access Yes Yes Yes
Teams & business
Team workspace Yes Yes Yes
Enterprise plan or SSO Yes Yes Yes
Connects to other apps Yes Yes Yes
Open source or self-hosted No Yes–
AI abilities
Works with your files Yes Yes Yes
Understands images– Yes Yes
Makes images No No No
Makes video No No No
Writes code No Yes–
Runs agents or automations Yes Yes Yes
Learns your brand or style No No–
Works in many languages Yes– Yes
Capabilities score9/ 1710/ 178/ 17

Pricing

Plans as listed on each vendor's site when we last checked. Confirm before you buy.

AttributeMaken8nNanonets
Plans

Free

Free

Learning the canvas and running a couple of light scenarios.

Community Edition

Free (self-hosted)

Anyone comfortable running software on a server.

StarterOur pick

$50 free credits, then pay as you go

Small teams testing it or running modest volumes.

CoreOur pick

From $9/mo billed yearly

One person automating a small business.

StarterOur pick

€20/mo billed yearly

A small business that wants n8n hosted for them.

Growth

Custom

Finance teams with steady monthly volume.

Pro

From $16/mo billed yearly

Anyone whose automations have become business-critical.

Pro

€50/mo billed yearly

Teams running several business-critical workflows.

Enterprise

Custom

Large or regulated organisations.

Teams

From $29/mo billed yearly

A team sharing scenarios and connections.

Business

€667/mo billed yearly

Larger teams that need SSO and version control, self-hosted.

Enterprise

Custom

Companies that need SSO, audit logs and an uptime guarantee.

Enterprise

Custom

Companies that need an SLA and dedicated support.

Which plan to pickCore is enough for most small businesses, and 10,000 credits goes a long way when routers and error handlers are free. Move to Pro if a failed run costs you money and you want priority execution and better logs.If you have anyone technical on hand, self-host the Community Edition on a small server and pay nothing. Otherwise Starter on the cloud is the right place to begin, and 2,500 executions covers a lot when each run of a long workflow counts as one.Start on Starter with the free credits and push a month's worth of your real invoices through it. Only talk to sales about Growth once you know your volume and which accounting system it has to feed.

Key features

AttributeMaken8nNanonets
Standout features
  • Visual canvas
  • Routers, filters and iterators
  • Run history you can replay
  • AI Agents
  • Make Grid
  • HTTP and webhooks
  • AI agent nodes
  • Self-host for free
  • Code when you need it
  • Per-execution pricing
  • Thousands of templates
  • MCP support
  • AI data extraction
  • Workflow blocks
  • Human review
  • Many ways in
  • Accounting and ERP exports

Pros and cons

AttributeMaken8nNanonets
Pros
  • Much cheaper per step than Zapier
  • Branching, loops and filters are built in, not bolted on
  • Run history shows exactly what happened at every step
  • Routers and error handlers do not use credits
  • Generous free plan for learning
  • Free to self-host with no execution limits
  • The best tool here for AI agents and multi-step reasoning
  • Per-execution pricing on cloud is kind to long workflows
  • Huge template library and an active community
  • Code steps and the HTTP node mean you are rarely stuck
  • Reads messy scans and varied layouts without building templates
  • Covers the whole flow: capture, checks, approval and export
  • Free starting credits with no card
  • Wide range of accounting and ERP connections
  • Human review step keeps errors out of the books
Cons
  • Steeper learning curve than Zapier, especially around data mapping
  • Credit usage is hard to predict until you have run a scenario for a while
  • Fewer apps than Zapier, and some apps have thin coverage
  • Pricing page is hard to read, and the headline prices assume yearly billing
  • Steeper learning curve than Zapier or Make, with JSON everywhere
  • Self-hosting is a real job: updates, backups and security are on you
  • No free cloud plan, only a trial
  • The fair-code licence limits reselling it as a service
  • Business plan is self-hosted only and priced for larger companies
  • Usage pricing per block makes the monthly bill hard to predict
  • Some long-time users report accuracy dropping on new layouts and fiddly retraining
  • Processing speed can vary a lot between batches
  • Anything past the starter tier is a sales quote, and a few users report hard refund disputes

Who each one is for

AttributeMaken8nNanonets
Best for
  • Multi-step marketing workflows
  • Branching logic and filters
  • Processing batches of records
  • Automation on a budget
  • AI agents that act on email or chat
  • Self-hosted automation
  • Unlimited runs on your own server
  • Custom code steps when you need them
  • Accounts payable invoice capture
  • Receipts and expense documents
  • Bank statements and financial forms
  • Approval workflows with a human check
  • Getting PDF data into Xero, QuickBooks or NetSuite
You'll find it used by
  • Marketers
  • Ops teams
  • Agencies
  • Consultants
  • Developers
  • Ops teams
  • Agencies
  • Technical founders
  • Accounts payable teams
  • Bookkeepers
  • Finance managers
  • Operations teams
  • Logistics companies

Questions people ask

Which is better, Make, n8n or Nanonets?

n8n scores highest overall in our ratings (Make 4.3/5, n8n 4.5/5 and Nanonets 3.7/5). Make is best for multi-step marketing workflows and branching logic and filters. n8n is best for AI agents that act on email or chat and self-hosted automation. Nanonets is best for accounts payable invoice capture and receipts and expense documents.

Which is cheaper, Make, n8n or Nanonets?

Make: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at From $9/mo. n8n: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at €20/mo. Nanonets: There's no free plan. Paid plans start at $50 free credits.

Which is easier to use, Make, n8n or Nanonets?

Make rates highest for ease of use in our scores. Marketers and operators who've outgrown simple automations and want to see what their workflows are doing.

How we compare

Ratings are our own, from using each tool, across ease of use, features, output quality, value for money, speed & reliability.

Swap in another tool

More tools from Automation & Workflows in the library.