Skip to content

Side-by-side comparison · AI Assistants & LLMs

LMArena vs Perplexity vs Qwen Chat

Everything that matters when choosing between them, in one place: our rating, what each can do, what they cost, and the trade-offs.

LMArena

3.8

Free to start

Best overall

Perplexity

4.2

From $17/mo

Qwen Chat

4.0

From $4/mo

Comparing 3 tools, the maximum.

At a glance

Best value

Pick it if: Anyone choosing between AI tools, and people who want to know which model is leading right now.

Best overallEasiest to use

Pick it if: Anyone who researches as part of their job and is sick of having ten tabs open.

Pick it if: Anyone after a capable free assistant with image, video, slides and website tools, and developers who want open models.

Perplexity scores highest overall, but LMArena gives you more for your money. Which one is right comes down to what you value most.

Overview

AttributeLMArenaPerplexityQwen Chat
In one lineFree site where you compare AI models side by side and see which ones people rate best.Ask a question and get a short answer from the web, with links to every source.Alibaba's generous free assistant for research, slides, websites, images and video.
Pricing modelFreeFreemiumFreemium
Starting priceFree$17/mo$4/mo
Free plan Yes Yes Yes
Works with Claude Code No Yes No

Rating breakdown

Our scores out of 5. The higher bar in each row is highlighted.

AttributeLMArenaPerplexityQwen Chat
Overall rating3.84.2Winner4.0
Ease of useHow quickly someone non-technical gets value from it.
3.5
4.5
4.0
FeaturesHow completely it covers its own job, and how well the pieces fit together.
4.0
3.5
4.0
Output qualityHow good the results are before you fix them.
3.5
4.5
4.0
Value for moneyWhat you get for the price, including the free plan.
5.0
4.0
4.5
Speed & reliabilityHow fast it is and how often it falls over.
3.0
4.5
3.5

Feature comparison

A tick means it does this today. A dash means we haven't checked.

AttributeLMArenaPerplexityQwen Chat
Access & platform
Free plan Yes Yes Yes
Mobile app No Yes Yes
Desktop app No Yes No
Browser extension No Yes No
API access No Yes Yes
Teams & business
Team workspace No Yes No
Enterprise plan or SSO No Yes No
Connects to other apps No Yes No
Open source or self-hosted No No Yes
AI abilities
Works with your files Yes Yes Yes
Understands images Yes Yes Yes
Makes images Yes Yes Yes
Makes video Yes Yes Yes
Writes code Yes Yes Yes
Runs agents or automations No Yes Yes
Learns your brand or style No No No
Works in many languages Yes Yes Yes
Capabilities score7/ 1715/ 1711/ 17

Pricing

Plans as listed on each vendor's site when we last checked. Confirm before you buy.

AttributeLMArenaPerplexityQwen Chat
Plans

FreeOur pick

Free

Everyone.

Free

Free

Everyday questions and quick fact-checks.

FreeOur pick

Free

Most people. The free limits are generous for chat and research.

ProOur pick

$17/mo billed yearly

Anyone who researches as part of their job.

Go

$4/mo

Regular users who want higher chat limits.

Max

$167/mo billed yearly

Power users running the Computer agent all day.

Plus

$19/mo

Creators making images and video most days.

Enterprise Pro

$34/seat/mo billed yearly

Teams that need admin controls and data protection.

Pro

$99/mo

Heavy video and image users who need priority.

Enterprise Max

$271/seat/mo billed yearly

Research teams working with large datasets and files.

Which plan to pickThere's nothing to buy. Use it free, and pay for whichever assistant comes out best for your work.Start free and see how often you hit the Pro search limit. If you research most days, Pro pays for itself in saved tabs. Its 4,000 bonus Computer credits are a one-off and run out after about 30 days, so don't count them as a monthly allowance. Max only makes sense if you're using the Computer agent heavily enough to burn through the credits.Start free; most people never need to pay. Go at $4 is cheap if you hit the chat limits. Prices are App Store prices, so check the in-app screen before you subscribe.

Key features

AttributeLMArenaPerplexityQwen Chat
Standout features
  • Battle mode
  • Side by side
  • Direct chat
  • Leaderboards
  • Agent mode
  • Early access
  • Cited answers
  • Deep research
  • Comet browser
  • Computer
  • Spaces
  • Choice of models
  • Deep Research
  • Web Dev
  • Slides
  • Image and video
  • Thinking mode
  • Open models

Pros and cons

AttributeLMArenaPerplexityQwen Chat
Pros
  • Free access to the leading models, often before release
  • Blind voting makes it easy to judge models on output alone
  • Leaderboards cover text, code, images, video and agents
  • Real people's preferences are harder to game than lab benchmarks
  • Sources on every answer make it the easiest assistant to fact-check
  • Short, direct answers instead of padded essays
  • Free plan is useful on its own and Comet is free
  • Lets you pick from the best models from several companies
  • Fast, and the mobile app is good
  • One of the most generous free plans in the category
  • Broad toolkit: research, slides, websites, images and video in one place
  • Top Qwen models rank near the best US models
  • Open models you can run yourself
  • International service is run from Singapore
Cons
  • Rankings favour answers that look good, and labs have been caught testing private versions to climb the board
  • Conversations are collected and partly shared with model makers, so keep private work out
  • Frequent "something went wrong" errors, captchas, logouts and models removed without notice
  • Direct chat is being narrowed, with newer models only available in random battles
  • The company now sells evaluations to the labs it ranks, which raises questions about neutrality
  • Weak for long writing, planning or creative work
  • Computer credits are confusing: Pro's bonus credits expire after about 30 days, and Comet's browser actions and Automations spend them
  • Sources are sometimes low quality, so you still need to read them
  • Max is expensive for what most businesses need
  • Avoids or slants topics sensitive to the Chinese government
  • Thinking mode on the newest models can be very slow
  • Paid plans are new and the free limits aren't published, so it's unclear how long the free plan stays this generous
  • Chats can be used, de-identified, to improve the service; you have to email to opt out of training
  • No connections to business apps

Who each one is for

AttributeLMArenaPerplexityQwen Chat
Best for
  • Choosing between AI models with your own prompts
  • Checking which model leads after a launch
  • Trying top models for free
  • Comparing image and video models
  • Fact-checking and quick research
  • Competitor and market research
  • Comparing products before you buy
  • Getting up to speed on a new topic
  • A free assistant that does a bit of everything
  • Quick webpages and slide decks from a prompt
  • Free image and short video generation
  • Deep research reports
  • Developers who want open models
You'll find it used by
  • AI enthusiasts
  • Developers
  • Product teams
  • Journalists
  • Researchers
  • Marketers
  • Consultants
  • Founders
  • Students
  • Developers
  • Budget-conscious founders
  • Content creators

Questions people ask

Which is better, LMArena, Perplexity or Qwen Chat?

Perplexity scores highest overall in our ratings (LMArena 3.8/5, Perplexity 4.2/5 and Qwen Chat 4.0/5). LMArena is best for choosing between AI models with your own prompts and checking which model leads after a launch. Perplexity is best for fact-checking and quick research and competitor and market research. Qwen Chat is best for A free assistant that does a bit of everything and quick webpages and slide decks from a prompt.

Which is cheaper, LMArena, Perplexity or Qwen Chat?

LMArena: It's free to use. Perplexity: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at $17/mo. Qwen Chat: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at $4/mo.

Which is easier to use, LMArena, Perplexity or Qwen Chat?

Perplexity rates highest for ease of use in our scores. Anyone who researches as part of their job and is sick of having ten tabs open.

How we compare

Ratings are our own, from using each tool, across ease of use, features, output quality, value for money, speed & reliability.

Swap in another tool

More tools from AI Assistants & LLMs in the library.