Skip to content

Side-by-side comparison · AI Assistants & LLMs

Claude vs LMArena vs Perplexity

Everything that matters when choosing between them, in one place: our rating, what each can do, what they cost, and the trade-offs.

Best overall

Claude

4.6

From $20/mo

LMArena

3.8

Free to start

Perplexity

4.2

From $17/mo

Comparing 3 tools, the maximum.

At a glance

Best overall

Pick it if: Anyone who writes, researches or makes decisions for a living, plus anyone curious about Claude Code.

Best value

Pick it if: Anyone choosing between AI tools, and people who want to know which model is leading right now.

Pick it if: Anyone who researches as part of their job and is sick of having ten tabs open.

Claude scores highest overall, but LMArena gives you more for your money. Which one is right comes down to what you value most.

Overview

AttributeClaudeLMArenaPerplexity
In one lineAnthropic's chat assistant, at its best on careful writing and long documents.Free site where you compare AI models side by side and see which ones people rate best.Ask a question and get a short answer from the web, with links to every source.
Pricing modelFreemiumFreeFreemium
Starting price$20/moFree$17/mo
Free plan Yes Yes Yes
Works with Claude Code Yes No Yes

Rating breakdown

Our scores out of 5. The higher bar in each row is highlighted.

AttributeClaudeLMArenaPerplexity
Overall rating4.6Winner3.84.2
Ease of useHow quickly someone non-technical gets value from it.
4.5
3.5
4.5
FeaturesHow completely it covers its own job, and how well the pieces fit together.
4.5
4.0
3.5
Output qualityHow good the results are before you fix them.
5.0
3.5
4.5
Value for moneyWhat you get for the price, including the free plan.
4.5
5.0
4.0
Speed & reliabilityHow fast it is and how often it falls over.
4.5
3.0
4.5

Feature comparison

A tick means it does this today. A dash means we haven't checked.

AttributeClaudeLMArenaPerplexity
Access & platform
Free plan Yes Yes Yes
Mobile app Yes No Yes
Desktop app Yes No Yes
Browser extension Yes No Yes
API access Yes No Yes
Teams & business
Team workspace Yes No Yes
Enterprise plan or SSO Yes No Yes
Connects to other apps Yes No Yes
Open source or self-hosted No No No
AI abilities
Works with your files Yes Yes Yes
Understands images Yes Yes Yes
Makes images No Yes Yes
Makes video No Yes Yes
Writes code Yes Yes Yes
Runs agents or automations Yes No Yes
Learns your brand or style Yes No No
Works in many languages Yes Yes Yes
Capabilities score14/ 177/ 1715/ 17

Pricing

Plans as listed on each vendor's site when we last checked. Confirm before you buy.

AttributeClaudeLMArenaPerplexity
Plans

Free

Free

Trying it out and light daily use.

FreeOur pick

Free

Everyone.

Free

Free

Everyday questions and quick fact-checks.

ProOur pick

$20/mo, or $17/mo billed yearly

Anyone who uses it most days.

ProOur pick

$17/mo billed yearly

Anyone who researches as part of their job.

Max

From $100/mo

Heavy users and people living in Claude Code.

Max

$167/mo billed yearly

Power users running the Computer agent all day.

Team

From $20/seat/mo billed yearly

Businesses with 2 to 150 people.

Enterprise Pro

$34/seat/mo billed yearly

Teams that need admin controls and data protection.

Enterprise Max

$271/seat/mo billed yearly

Research teams working with large datasets and files.

Which plan to pickStart on Free to see if the writing suits you. Most people who stick with it move to Pro within a month; only go to Max if you hit the Pro limits every day or you're running Claude Code for hours at a time.There's nothing to buy. Use it free, and pay for whichever assistant comes out best for your work.Start free and see how often you hit the Pro search limit. If you research most days, Pro pays for itself in saved tabs. Its 4,000 bonus Computer credits are a one-off and run out after about 30 days, so don't count them as a monthly allowance. Max only makes sense if you're using the Computer agent heavily enough to burn through the credits.

Key features

AttributeClaudeLMArenaPerplexity
Standout features
  • Projects
  • Artifacts
  • Long documents
  • Web search and connectors
  • Tasks and Claude Code
  • Memory
  • Battle mode
  • Side by side
  • Direct chat
  • Leaderboards
  • Agent mode
  • Early access
  • Cited answers
  • Deep research
  • Comet browser
  • Computer
  • Spaces
  • Choice of models

Pros and cons

AttributeClaudeLMArenaPerplexity
Pros
  • Writing sounds like a person and needs the least editing of any assistant
  • Handles long documents and messy briefs without losing track
  • Projects and memory mean you stop repeating the same context
  • Artifacts turn answers into real documents, slides and small apps
  • One subscription covers Claude Code as well
  • The free plan now includes memory, connectors and Artifacts
  • Free access to the leading models, often before release
  • Blind voting makes it easy to judge models on output alone
  • Leaderboards cover text, code, images, video and agents
  • Real people's preferences are harder to game than lab benchmarks
  • Sources on every answer make it the easiest assistant to fact-check
  • Short, direct answers instead of padded essays
  • Free plan is useful on its own and Comet is free
  • Lets you pick from the best models from several companies
  • Fast, and the mobile app is good
Cons
  • Free and Pro usage limits can bite on a busy day
  • No image or video generation, which ChatGPT and Gemini both have
  • The free plan doesn't include the top Opus models
  • Fewer third-party connectors and plugins than ChatGPT
  • Rankings favour answers that look good, and labs have been caught testing private versions to climb the board
  • Conversations are collected and partly shared with model makers, so keep private work out
  • Frequent "something went wrong" errors, captchas, logouts and models removed without notice
  • Direct chat is being narrowed, with newer models only available in random battles
  • The company now sells evaluations to the labs it ranks, which raises questions about neutrality
  • Weak for long writing, planning or creative work
  • Computer credits are confusing: Pro's bonus credits expire after about 30 days, and Comet's browser actions and Automations spend them
  • Sources are sometimes low quality, so you still need to read them
  • Max is expensive for what most businesses need

Who each one is for

AttributeClaudeLMArenaPerplexity
Best for
  • Long-form writing and editing
  • Reading and summarising long documents
  • Thinking through a plan or decision
  • Pairing with Claude Code
  • Choosing between AI models with your own prompts
  • Checking which model leads after a launch
  • Trying top models for free
  • Comparing image and video models
  • Fact-checking and quick research
  • Competitor and market research
  • Comparing products before you buy
  • Getting up to speed on a new topic
You'll find it used by
  • Writers and marketers
  • Founders
  • Consultants
  • Developers
  • AI enthusiasts
  • Developers
  • Product teams
  • Journalists
  • Researchers
  • Marketers
  • Consultants
  • Founders

Questions people ask

Which is better, Claude, LMArena or Perplexity?

Claude scores highest overall in our ratings (Claude 4.6/5, LMArena 3.8/5 and Perplexity 4.2/5). Claude is best for long-form writing and editing and reading and summarising long documents. LMArena is best for choosing between AI models with your own prompts and checking which model leads after a launch. Perplexity is best for fact-checking and quick research and competitor and market research.

Which is cheaper, Claude, LMArena or Perplexity?

Claude: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at $20/mo. LMArena: It's free to use. Perplexity: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at $17/mo.

How we compare

Ratings are our own, from using each tool, across ease of use, features, output quality, value for money, speed & reliability.

Swap in another tool

More tools from AI Assistants & LLMs in the library.