Skip to content

Side-by-side comparison · AI Assistants & LLMs

LMArena vs Le Chat vs Perplexity

Everything that matters when choosing between them, in one place: our rating, what each can do, what they cost, and the trade-offs.

LMArena

3.8

Free to start

Le Chat

4.1

From $14.99/mo

Best overall

Perplexity

4.2

From $17/mo

Comparing 3 tools, the maximum.

At a glance

Best value

Pick it if: Anyone choosing between AI tools, and people who want to know which model is leading right now.

Pick it if: Teams that care where their data lives, and anyone after a capable assistant for less money.

Best overallEasiest to use

Pick it if: Anyone who researches as part of their job and is sick of having ten tabs open.

Perplexity scores highest overall, but LMArena gives you more for your money. Which one is right comes down to what you value most.

Overview

AttributeLMArenaLe ChatPerplexity
In one lineFree site where you compare AI models side by side and see which ones people rate best.Mistral's fast European assistant, with a usable free plan and a cheaper Pro plan.Ask a question and get a short answer from the web, with links to every source.
Pricing modelFreeFreemiumFreemium
Starting priceFree$14.99/mo$17/mo
Free plan Yes Yes Yes
Works with Claude Code No No Yes

Rating breakdown

Our scores out of 5. The higher bar in each row is highlighted.

AttributeLMArenaLe ChatPerplexity
Overall rating3.84.14.2Winner
Ease of useHow quickly someone non-technical gets value from it.
3.5
4.0
4.5
FeaturesHow completely it covers its own job, and how well the pieces fit together.
4.0
3.5
3.5
Output qualityHow good the results are before you fix them.
3.5
3.5
4.5
Value for moneyWhat you get for the price, including the free plan.
5.0
4.5
4.0
Speed & reliabilityHow fast it is and how often it falls over.
3.0
5.0
4.5

Feature comparison

A tick means it does this today. A dash means we haven't checked.

AttributeLMArenaLe ChatPerplexity
Access & platform
Free plan Yes Yes Yes
Mobile app No Yes Yes
Desktop app No Yes Yes
Browser extension No No Yes
API access No Yes Yes
Teams & business
Team workspace No Yes Yes
Enterprise plan or SSO No Yes Yes
Connects to other apps No Yes Yes
Open source or self-hosted No Yes No
AI abilities
Works with your files Yes Yes Yes
Understands images Yes Yes Yes
Makes images Yes Yes Yes
Makes video Yes No Yes
Writes code Yes Yes Yes
Runs agents or automations No Yes Yes
Learns your brand or style No Yes No
Works in many languages Yes Yes Yes
Capabilities score7/ 1715/ 1715/ 17

Pricing

Plans as listed on each vendor's site when we last checked. Confirm before you buy.

AttributeLMArenaLe ChatPerplexity
Plans

FreeOur pick

Free

Everyone.

Free

Free

Everyday questions and a look at the Work and Code modes.

Free

Free

Everyday questions and quick fact-checks.

ProOur pick

$14.99/mo

Anyone who wants a capable daily assistant for less.

ProOur pick

$17/mo billed yearly

Anyone who researches as part of their job.

Team

$24.99/user/mo

Small teams that want shared billing and higher limits.

Max

$167/mo billed yearly

Power users running the Computer agent all day.

Enterprise

Custom

Organisations with compliance and custom needs.

Enterprise Pro

$34/seat/mo billed yearly

Teams that need admin controls and data protection.

Enterprise Max

$271/seat/mo billed yearly

Research teams working with large datasets and files.

Which plan to pickThere's nothing to buy. Use it free, and pay for whichever assistant comes out best for your work.The free plan is enough to see if the speed and tone suit you. Pro is good value at $14.99 and a sensible second assistant next to Claude. Students can get Pro for $5.99 a month for up to 12 months.Start free and see how often you hit the Pro search limit. If you research most days, Pro pays for itself in saved tabs. Its 4,000 bonus Computer credits are a one-off and run out after about 30 days, so don't count them as a monthly allowance. Max only makes sense if you're using the Computer agent heavily enough to burn through the credits.

Key features

AttributeLMArenaLe ChatPerplexity
Standout features
  • Battle mode
  • Side by side
  • Direct chat
  • Leaderboards
  • Agent mode
  • Early access
  • Fast answers
  • Work mode
  • Code mode
  • Documents and images
  • Memory
  • EU hosting and open models
  • Cited answers
  • Deep research
  • Comet browser
  • Computer
  • Spaces
  • Choice of models

Pros and cons

AttributeLMArenaLe ChatPerplexity
Pros
  • Free access to the leading models, often before release
  • Blind voting makes it easy to judge models on output alone
  • Leaderboards cover text, code, images, video and agents
  • Real people's preferences are harder to game than lab benchmarks
  • EU hosting by default and open-weight models
  • Fastest responses in the category
  • Pro is cheaper than the equivalent OpenAI or Anthropic plan
  • Work mode runs real multi-step jobs across your apps
  • Clear, less preachy answers
  • Sources on every answer make it the easiest assistant to fact-check
  • Short, direct answers instead of padded essays
  • Free plan is useful on its own and Comet is free
  • Lets you pick from the best models from several companies
  • Fast, and the mobile app is good
Cons
  • Rankings favour answers that look good, and labs have been caught testing private versions to climb the board
  • Conversations are collected and partly shared with model makers, so keep private work out
  • Frequent "something went wrong" errors, captchas, logouts and models removed without notice
  • Direct chat is being narrowed, with newer models only available in random battles
  • The company now sells evaluations to the labs it ranks, which raises questions about neutrality
  • Reasoning and long-document quality trail Claude and ChatGPT
  • Smaller ecosystem of guides, plugins and community help
  • Free plan limits aren't published in plain numbers
  • The rename to Vibe and the new modes make it harder to find your way around
  • Weak for long writing, planning or creative work
  • Computer credits are confusing: Pro's bonus credits expire after about 30 days, and Comet's browser actions and Automations spend them
  • Sources are sometimes low quality, so you still need to read them
  • Max is expensive for what most businesses need

Who each one is for

AttributeLMArenaLe ChatPerplexity
Best for
  • Choosing between AI models with your own prompts
  • Checking which model leads after a launch
  • Trying top models for free
  • Comparing image and video models
  • Fast everyday questions
  • Privacy-conscious organisations
  • A cheaper paid plan
  • Reading and summarising documents
  • Fact-checking and quick research
  • Competitor and market research
  • Comparing products before you buy
  • Getting up to speed on a new topic
You'll find it used by
  • AI enthusiasts
  • Developers
  • Product teams
  • Journalists
  • Privacy-conscious teams
  • European businesses
  • Solo founders
  • Developers
  • Researchers
  • Marketers
  • Consultants
  • Founders

Questions people ask

Which is better, LMArena, Le Chat or Perplexity?

Perplexity scores highest overall in our ratings (LMArena 3.8/5, Le Chat 4.1/5 and Perplexity 4.2/5). LMArena is best for choosing between AI models with your own prompts and checking which model leads after a launch. Le Chat is best for fast everyday questions and privacy-conscious organisations. Perplexity is best for fact-checking and quick research and competitor and market research.

Which is cheaper, LMArena, Le Chat or Perplexity?

LMArena: It's free to use. Le Chat: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at $14.99/mo. Perplexity: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at $17/mo.

Which is easier to use, LMArena, Le Chat or Perplexity?

Perplexity rates highest for ease of use in our scores. Anyone who researches as part of their job and is sick of having ten tabs open.

How we compare

Ratings are our own, from using each tool, across ease of use, features, output quality, value for money, speed & reliability.

Swap in another tool

More tools from AI Assistants & LLMs in the library.