Skip to content

Side-by-side comparison · Coding & Dev Tools

Google Antigravity vs Kiro vs OpenAI Codex

Everything that matters when choosing between them, in one place: our rating, what each can do, what they cost, and the trade-offs.

Google Antigravity

3.9

From $19.99/mo

Kiro

3.6

From $20/mo

Best overall

OpenAI Codex

4.2

From $8/mo

Comparing 3 tools, the maximum.

At a glance

Pick it if: Google AI Pro subscribers, and anyone who wants to try handing coding work to AI agents for free.

Kiro3.6
Easiest to use

Pick it if: Developers and technical founders who want a written plan before the AI builds anything, especially teams already on AWS.

Best overall

Pick it if: ChatGPT subscribers who want a coding agent without paying for a second subscription.

Overview

AttributeGoogle AntigravityKiroOpenAI Codex
In one lineGoogle's free coding app. You hand tasks to AI agents and review what they produce.Amazon's AI code editor that writes a plan and requirements before it writes any code.OpenAI's coding agent. Hand it a task and it works away while you do other things.
Pricing modelFreemiumFreemiumFreemium
Starting price$19.99/mo$20/mo$8/mo
Free plan Yes Yes Yes
Works with Claude Code No Yes No

Rating breakdown

Our scores out of 5. The higher bar in each row is highlighted.

AttributeGoogle AntigravityKiroOpenAI Codex
Overall rating3.93.64.2Winner
Ease of useHow quickly someone non-technical gets value from it.
3.5
4.0
3.5
FeaturesHow completely it covers its own job, and how well the pieces fit together.
4.0
4.5
4.5
Output qualityHow good the results are before you fix them.
4.0
3.5
4.5
Value for moneyWhat you get for the price, including the free plan.
4.5
3.0
4.5
Speed & reliabilityHow fast it is and how often it falls over.
3.5
3.0
4.0

Feature comparison

A tick means it does this today. A dash means we haven't checked.

AttributeGoogle AntigravityKiroOpenAI Codex
Access & platform
Free plan Yes Yes Yes
Mobile app No Yes Yes
Desktop app Yes Yes Yes
Browser extension Yes No No
API access Yes No Yes
Teams & business
Team workspace Yes Yes Yes
Enterprise plan or SSO Yes Yes Yes
Connects to other apps Yes Yes Yes
Open source or self-hosted No No Yes
AI abilities
Works with your files Yes Yes Yes
Understands images Yes Yes Yes
Makes images Yes No No
Makes video No No No
Writes code Yes Yes Yes
Runs agents or automations Yes Yes Yes
Learns your brand or style Yes Yes Yes
Works in many languages Yes Yes Yes
Capabilities score14/ 1712/ 1714/ 17

Pricing

Plans as listed on each vendor's site when we last checked. Confirm before you buy.

AttributeGoogle AntigravityKiroOpenAI Codex
Plans

IndividualOur pick

Free

Trying agent-based coding without paying.

Free

Free

Trying spec mode on a small project.

Free

Free

A quick look at what it can do.

Google AI Pro

$19.99/mo

People who already have or want the Google AI Pro bundle.

ProOur pick

$20/mo

Most individuals using it a few days a week.

Go

$8/mo

Occasional light tasks.

Google AI Ultra

From $99.99/mo

Developers who want Antigravity as a daily driver.

Pro+

$40/mo

Regular daily users.

PlusOur pick

$20/mo

Anyone who already pays for ChatGPT.

Business (via Google Cloud)

From $30/seat/mo

Companies already on Google Cloud.

Pro Max

$100/mo

Professionals in Kiro for hours each day.

Pro

From $100/mo

Developers who hit the Plus limits.

Power

$200/mo

The heaviest users.

Business

$20/user/mo billed yearly, or $25 monthly

Teams of 2 or more.

Enterprise

Custom

Companies that need SSO and central billing.

Enterprise

Custom

Large organisations.

Which plan to pickStart on the free Individual tier; it is the whole point. If you hit the weekly limits and you also use Gemini for other things, Google AI Pro at $19.99 is a sensible step. Ultra only makes sense for full-time developers.Pro at $20 is the place to start, and you get $20 off your first paid month when you upgrade. Use the Auto model to make credits last, and only move up a tier once you know your monthly usage.If you already have ChatGPT Plus, you have Codex: just try it. If you are choosing between this and Claude Code with no existing subscription, Plus at $20 and Claude Pro at $20 cost the same, so pick whichever chat assistant you prefer. If you outgrow Plus, Pro starts at $100 and has no five-hour limit for now. The $200 tier gives new subscribers less usage than it used to, and Ultrafast mode is only on the $500 tier.

Key features

AttributeGoogle AntigravityKiroOpenAI Codex
Standout features
  • Agent manager
  • Artifacts you can check
  • Full editor and CLI
  • Browser agent
  • Gemini models
  • Agent kit
  • Specs
  • Vibe mode
  • Hooks
  • Workflows and Crew
  • Web and iPhone
  • Powers
  • Cloud tasks
  • Desktop app and CLI
  • Start from your phone
  • Automatic code review
  • AGENTS.md
  • Open source CLI

Pros and cons

AttributeGoogle AntigravityKiroOpenAI Codex
Pros
  • Free tier is good enough for real projects
  • Agent manager and verification artifacts make reviewing AI work easier
  • Browser agent tests your app, not just the code
  • Included with Google AI Pro, which many people already pay for
  • Spec mode makes the AI's plan easy to read and change before it builds
  • One subscription covers editor, terminal, web and iPhone
  • Good choice for businesses already on AWS
  • Hooks and Powers automate a lot of busywork
  • Included with every ChatGPT plan, so many people already have it
  • Cloud tasks let you start work from anywhere and come back later
  • Strong on tough, multi-file coding jobs
  • The CLI is open source and works with an API key
Cons
  • Free limits have been cut before and could change again
  • Capacity errors at busy times on the free tier
  • Tied to Gemini models, so you cannot bring Claude or OpenAI
  • The product has been renamed and reorganised more than once this year
  • Credits run out fast on the best models, and multipliers have gone up
  • Workflows are slow, ask for approval constantly and burn credits
  • Free plan's 50 credits a month is very small
  • History of pricing changes, including a botched launch in 2025
  • Some users say its agent uses more tokens than Claude Code or Codex for the same job
  • Five-hour and weekly limits bite on Plus if you use it seriously
  • Cloud tasks use more of your allowance than local ones
  • It asks fewer questions than Claude Code before changing things
  • Model names and limits change often, which makes it hard to plan costs
  • The $200 Pro tier now gives new subscribers less usage than before

Who each one is for

AttributeGoogle AntigravityKiroOpenAI Codex
Best for
  • Trying AI coding agents for free
  • Running several agents at once
  • Building with Gemini
  • Google AI Pro subscribers
  • Turning a rough idea into requirements and a plan
  • Bigger features you want planned before building
  • Teams already on AWS
  • Automating checks with hooks
  • Background tasks in the cloud
  • Starting a task from your phone
  • Developers already on ChatGPT Plus
  • Coding in the terminal
You'll find it used by
  • Google AI Pro subscribers
  • Developers
  • Students
  • Startups on Google Cloud
  • Developers
  • AWS teams
  • Technical founders
  • Students
  • ChatGPT subscribers
  • Developers
  • Startup teams
  • Solo founders

Questions people ask

Which is better, Google Antigravity, Kiro or OpenAI Codex?

OpenAI Codex scores highest overall in our ratings (Google Antigravity 3.9/5, Kiro 3.6/5 and OpenAI Codex 4.2/5). Google Antigravity is best for Trying AI coding agents for free and running several agents at once. Kiro is best for turning a rough idea into requirements and a plan and bigger features you want planned before building. OpenAI Codex is best for background tasks in the cloud and starting a task from your phone.

Which is cheaper, Google Antigravity, Kiro or OpenAI Codex?

Google Antigravity: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at $19.99/mo. Kiro: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at $20/mo. OpenAI Codex: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at $8/mo.

Which is easier to use, Google Antigravity, Kiro or OpenAI Codex?

Kiro rates highest for ease of use in our scores. Developers and technical founders who want a written plan before the AI builds anything, especially teams already on AWS.

How we compare

Ratings are our own, from using each tool, across ease of use, features, output quality, value for money, speed & reliability.

Swap in another tool

More tools from Coding & Dev Tools in the library.