Skip to content

Side-by-side comparison · Coding & Dev Tools

CodeRabbit vs Google Antigravity vs Kiro

Everything that matters when choosing between them, in one place: our rating, what each can do, what they cost, and the trade-offs.

CodeRabbit

3.9

From $24/dev/mo

Google Antigravity

3.9

From $19.99/mo

Kiro

3.6

From $20/mo

Comparing 3 tools, the maximum.

At a glance

Easiest to use

Pick it if: Teams and solo builders shipping code through GitHub or GitLab, especially those letting AI agents write most of it.

Best value

Pick it if: Google AI Pro subscribers, and anyone who wants to try handing coding work to AI agents for free.

Kiro3.6

Pick it if: Developers and technical founders who want a written plan before the AI builds anything, especially teams already on AWS.

Overview

AttributeCodeRabbitGoogle AntigravityKiro
In one lineAI that reviews every code change on GitHub and flags bugs before they go live.Google's free coding app. You hand tasks to AI agents and review what they produce.Amazon's AI code editor that writes a plan and requirements before it writes any code.
Pricing modelFreemiumFreemiumFreemium
Starting price$24/dev/mo$19.99/mo$20/mo
Free plan Yes Yes Yes
Works with Claude Code Yes No Yes

Rating breakdown

Our scores out of 5. The higher bar in each row is highlighted.

AttributeCodeRabbitGoogle AntigravityKiro
Overall rating3.93.93.6
Ease of useHow quickly someone non-technical gets value from it.
4.5
3.5
4.0
FeaturesHow completely it covers its own job, and how well the pieces fit together.
4.5
4.0
4.5
Output qualityHow good the results are before you fix them.
4.0
4.0
3.5
Value for moneyWhat you get for the price, including the free plan.
3.0
4.5
3.0
Speed & reliabilityHow fast it is and how often it falls over.
3.5
3.5
3.0

Feature comparison

A tick means it does this today. A dash means we haven't checked.

AttributeCodeRabbitGoogle AntigravityKiro
Access & platform
Free plan Yes Yes Yes
Mobile app No No Yes
Desktop app No Yes Yes
Browser extension No Yes No
API access Yes Yes No
Teams & business
Team workspace Yes Yes Yes
Enterprise plan or SSO Yes Yes Yes
Connects to other apps Yes Yes Yes
Open source or self-hosted– No No
AI abilities
Works with your files No Yes Yes
Understands images No Yes Yes
Makes images No Yes No
Makes video No No No
Writes code Yes Yes Yes
Runs agents or automations Yes Yes Yes
Learns your brand or style Yes Yes Yes
Works in many languages Yes Yes Yes
Capabilities score9/ 1714/ 1712/ 17

Pricing

Plans as listed on each vendor's site when we last checked. Confirm before you buy.

AttributeCodeRabbitGoogle AntigravityKiro
Plans

Free

Free

Open-source projects and trying it out.

IndividualOur pick

Free

Trying agent-based coding without paying.

Free

Free

Trying spec mode on a small project.

EssentialsOur pick

$24/dev/mo billed yearly, or $30 monthly

Small teams who want every pull request reviewed.

Google AI Pro

$19.99/mo

People who already have or want the Google AI Pro bundle.

ProOur pick

$20/mo

Most individuals using it a few days a week.

Team

$48/dev/mo billed yearly, or $60 monthly

Busier teams with many open pull requests.

Google AI Ultra

From $99.99/mo

Developers who want Antigravity as a daily driver.

Pro+

$40/mo

Regular daily users.

Advanced

$72/dev/mo billed yearly, or $90 monthly

Teams that want security monitoring.

Business (via Google Cloud)

From $30/seat/mo

Companies already on Google Cloud.

Pro Max

$100/mo

Professionals in Kiro for hours each day.

Enterprise

Custom

Large organisations.

Power

$200/mo

The heaviest users.

Enterprise

Custom

Companies that need SSO and central billing.

Which plan to pickStart with the 14-day trial. Essentials is enough for most small teams; you only pay for developers who open pull requests. Turn on usage-based reviews ($0.25 a file) with a monthly cap if you keep hitting the hourly limit.Start on the free Individual tier; it is the whole point. If you hit the weekly limits and you also use Gemini for other things, Google AI Pro at $19.99 is a sensible step. Ultra only makes sense for full-time developers.Pro at $20 is the place to start, and you get $20 off your first paid month when you upgrade. Use the Auto model to make credits last, and only move up a tier once you know your monthly usage.

Key features

AttributeCodeRabbitGoogle AntigravityKiro
Standout features
  • Pull request reviews
  • One-click fixes
  • Learns your rules
  • Reviews before you commit
  • Pre-merge checks
  • Triage and security
  • Agent manager
  • Artifacts you can check
  • Full editor and CLI
  • Browser agent
  • Gemini models
  • Agent kit
  • Specs
  • Vibe mode
  • Hooks
  • Workflows and Crew
  • Web and iPhone
  • Powers

Pros and cons

AttributeCodeRabbitGoogle AntigravityKiro
Pros
  • Set up in minutes and reviews every pull request automatically
  • Catches real bugs, including ones the coding agent missed
  • Works with any coding agent or editor
  • Free for open-source projects
  • Learns your preferences when you reply to it
  • Free tier is good enough for real projects
  • Agent manager and verification artifacts make reviewing AI work easier
  • Browser agent tests your app, not just the code
  • Included with Google AI Pro, which many people already pay for
  • Spec mode makes the AI's plan easy to read and change before it builds
  • One subscription covers editor, terminal, web and iPhone
  • Good choice for businesses already on AWS
  • Hooks and Powers automate a lot of busywork
Cons
  • Marketed as unlimited, but hourly caps and fair-use throttling frustrate heavy users
  • Can be noisy, with nitpicks mixed in with real problems
  • Per-developer pricing adds up for bigger teams
  • Some users report billing mistakes, refund trouble and slow support
  • Free limits have been cut before and could change again
  • Capacity errors at busy times on the free tier
  • Tied to Gemini models, so you cannot bring Claude or OpenAI
  • The product has been renamed and reorganised more than once this year
  • Credits run out fast on the best models, and multipliers have gone up
  • Workflows are slow, ask for approval constantly and burn credits
  • Free plan's 50 credits a month is very small
  • History of pricing changes, including a botched launch in 2025
  • Some users say its agent uses more tokens than Claude Code or Codex for the same job

Who each one is for

AttributeCodeRabbitGoogle AntigravityKiro
Best for
  • Reviewing AI-written code before it ships
  • Small teams without a senior reviewer
  • Catching bugs and security issues in pull requests
  • Open-source projects (free)
  • Trying AI coding agents for free
  • Running several agents at once
  • Building with Gemini
  • Google AI Pro subscribers
  • Turning a rough idea into requirements and a plan
  • Bigger features you want planned before building
  • Teams already on AWS
  • Automating checks with hooks
You'll find it used by
  • Software teams
  • Open-source maintainers
  • Agencies
  • Solo founders
  • Google AI Pro subscribers
  • Developers
  • Students
  • Startups on Google Cloud
  • Developers
  • AWS teams
  • Technical founders
  • Students

Questions people ask

Which is better, CodeRabbit, Google Antigravity or Kiro?

They tie on our overall rating (CodeRabbit 3.9/5, Google Antigravity 3.9/5 and Kiro 3.6/5). CodeRabbit is best for Reviewing AI-written code before it ships and small teams without a senior reviewer. Google Antigravity is best for Trying AI coding agents for free and running several agents at once. Kiro is best for turning a rough idea into requirements and a plan and bigger features you want planned before building.

Which is cheaper, CodeRabbit, Google Antigravity or Kiro?

CodeRabbit: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at $24/dev/mo. Google Antigravity: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at $19.99/mo. Kiro: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at $20/mo.

Which is easier to use, CodeRabbit, Google Antigravity or Kiro?

CodeRabbit rates highest for ease of use in our scores. Teams and solo builders shipping code through GitHub or GitLab, especially those letting AI agents write most of it.

How we compare

Ratings are our own, from using each tool, across ease of use, features, output quality, value for money, speed & reliability.

Swap in another tool

More tools from Coding & Dev Tools in the library.