Skip to content

Side-by-side comparison · Presentations & Docs

Gamma vs Julius AI vs Pitch

Everything that matters when choosing between them, in one place: our rating, what each can do, what they cost, and the trade-offs.

Best overall

Gamma

4.5

Free to start

Julius AI

3.9

Free to start

Pitch

4.0

From €10/mo

Comparing 3 tools, the maximum.

At a glance

Best overallEasiest to use

Pick it if: Anyone who dreads building slides and would rather start from a finished draft than a blank template.

Pick it if: Business owners, marketers and analysts who have data in spreadsheets but no time to build reports by hand.

Pick it if: Startups and sales teams who build decks together and want to know what happens after they send them.

Overview

AttributeGammaJulius AIPitch
In one linePaste an outline and get a well-designed deck, doc or web page in minutes.Upload a spreadsheet and ask questions in plain English to get answers and charts.Collaborative deck builder for teams, with AI drafts, shared templates and view tracking.
Pricing modelFreemiumFreemiumFreemium
Starting priceFreeFree€10/mo
Free plan Yes Yes Yes
Works with Claude Code Yes No No

Rating breakdown

Our scores out of 5. The higher bar in each row is highlighted.

AttributeGammaJulius AIPitch
Overall rating4.5Winner3.94.0
Ease of useHow quickly someone non-technical gets value from it.
5.0
4.5
4.0
FeaturesHow completely it covers its own job, and how well the pieces fit together.
4.5
4.0
4.0
Output qualityHow good the results are before you fix them.
4.5
3.5
4.0
Value for moneyWhat you get for the price, including the free plan.
4.0
3.5
4.0
Speed & reliabilityHow fast it is and how often it falls over.
4.5
4.0
4.0

Feature comparison

A tick means it does this today. A dash means we haven't checked.

AttributeGammaJulius AIPitch
Access & platform
Free plan Yes Yes Yes
Mobile app Yes Yes Yes
Desktop app No– Yes
Browser extension No– No
API access Yes– No
Teams & business
Team workspace Yes Yes Yes
Enterprise plan or SSO Yes Yes Yes
Connects to other apps Yes Yes Yes
Open source or self-hosted No No No
AI abilities
Works with your files Yes Yes Yes
Understands images– Yes–
Makes images Yes No Yes
Makes video No No No
Writes code No Yes No
Runs agents or automations Yes– No
Learns your brand or style Yes– Yes
Works in many languages Yes– Yes
Capabilities score11/ 178/ 1710/ 17

Pricing

Plans as listed on each vendor's site when we last checked. Confirm before you buy.

AttributeGammaJulius AIPitch
Plans

Free

Free

Testing whether the output suits you.

Free

Free

Trying it on one or two files.

Free

Free

Individuals and teams of up to five trying it out.

PlusOur pick

See website

Individuals who make a few decks a month.

Plus

See website

Occasional analysis.

PlusOur pick

€10/mo billed yearly

One person who sends decks to clients.

Pro

See website

People who present weekly or want analytics and the API.

ProOur pick

See website

People analysing data every week.

Team

€15/seat/mo billed yearly

Small teams building decks together.

Ultra

See website

Heavy users running Gamma all day.

Business

See website

Teams sharing data and reports.

Business

€20/seat/mo billed yearly

Larger teams sending lots of decks.

Business

See website

Companies that need admin controls and single sign-on.

Enterprise

Custom

Large organisations.

Enterprise

Custom

Companies of 30 or more seats with security needs.

Which plan to pickUse the free credits to make two or three decks and judge the output. If you'll keep using it, Plus is the sensible step because it removes the badge and refreshes credits monthly. Only move to Pro if you want the API, custom domains or viewer analytics.Use Free to test it on your own data. If you analyse numbers most weeks, Pro is the plan most users land on because the cheaper tier's message cap runs out fast. Check the live pricing page, as plans and limits changed several times in 2026.Start on Free, which is enough to decide if the editor suits you. A solo consultant should move to Plus for clean PowerPoint exports. A sales team of three or more should go straight to Team for the shared credits and viewer tracking.

Key features

AttributeGammaJulius AIPitch
Standout features
  • Generate from anything
  • Cards, not slides
  • Gamma Agent
  • Themes and brand kit
  • Export anywhere
  • API and connectors
  • Chat with your data
  • Charts
  • Self-correcting code
  • Data connectors
  • Saved notebooks and reports
  • Live collaboration
  • AI first drafts
  • Custom templates
  • Pitch rooms and advanced links
  • Exports
  • Desktop and mobile apps

Pros and cons

AttributeGammaJulius AIPitch
Pros
  • Fastest route from notes to a presentable deck
  • Designs look polished without any design skill
  • One file works as a deck, document or web page
  • The agent makes rewrites and restyles painless
  • API and connectors mean it fits into automated workflows
  • Very easy for people who don't write formulas
  • Charts are clean and ready for a report
  • Fixes its own code errors
  • Saved notebooks make repeat reports quick
  • Best collaboration features in the category
  • Templates and brand controls that non-designers can follow
  • Viewer analytics tell you what happens after you hit send
  • Free plan is enough for small teams to work in
  • Desktop apps and a clean, fast editor
Cons
  • Free credits are a one-off, so the free plan runs out
  • Hard to keep strictly on brand across many decks
  • Credits drain quickly if you regenerate images often
  • Exports to PowerPoint don't always keep the layout intact
  • Vague questions give generic answers, and it sometimes does a different analysis than asked
  • Free plan is very small
  • Pricing and limits have changed often, which makes costs hard to plan
  • Overlaps heavily with file analysis in ChatGPT and Claude
  • AI credits are modest and the free batch never renews
  • Free plan exports carry Pitch branding and skip PowerPoint
  • Pricing is in euros, so your bill moves with the exchange rate
  • Fewer AI design flourishes than Gamma, so drafts need more hands-on work

Who each one is for

AttributeGammaJulius AIPitch
Best for
  • Pitch decks from notes
  • Internal updates and proposals
  • Turning a document into slides
  • Simple one-page websites
  • Quick answers from a spreadsheet
  • Charts for reports and decks
  • People who don't write formulas or code
  • Repeat reports on the same data
  • Fundraising and sales decks
  • Collaborative editing
  • Tracking who viewed a deck
  • Branded team templates
You'll find it used by
  • Founders
  • Marketers
  • Consultants
  • Sales teams
  • Educators
  • Business owners
  • Marketers
  • Analysts
  • Researchers
  • Students
  • Startups
  • Sales teams
  • Agencies
  • Marketers

Questions people ask

Which is better, Gamma, Julius AI or Pitch?

Gamma scores highest overall in our ratings (Gamma 4.5/5, Julius AI 3.9/5 and Pitch 4.0/5). Gamma is best for pitch decks from notes and internal updates and proposals. Julius AI is best for quick answers from a spreadsheet and charts for reports and decks. Pitch is best for fundraising and sales decks and collaborative editing.

Which is cheaper, Gamma, Julius AI or Pitch?

Gamma: It's free to use. Julius AI: It's free to use. Pitch: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at €10/mo.

Which is easier to use, Gamma, Julius AI or Pitch?

Gamma rates highest for ease of use in our scores. Anyone who dreads building slides and would rather start from a finished draft than a blank template.

How we compare

Ratings are our own, from using each tool, across ease of use, features, output quality, value for money, speed & reliability.

Swap in another tool

More tools from Presentations & Docs in the library.