Skip to content

Side-by-side comparison · Databases & Backend

Firebase vs Neon vs Supabase

Everything that matters when choosing between them, in one place: our rating, what each can do, what they cost, and the trade-offs.

Firebase

4.1

From Pay as you go

Neon

4.0

From Pay as you go

Best overall

Supabase

4.3

From From $25/mo

Comparing 3 tools, the maximum.

At a glance

Firebase

4.1

Pick it if: Teams building mobile or real-time apps, especially if you already live in Google's world.

Neon

4.0

Pick it if: Developers and Claude Code users who want a dependable Postgres database and nothing else.

Supabase

4.3
Best overallEasiest to use

Pick it if: Anyone building an app with AI tools who needs somewhere real to keep user accounts and data.

Overview

AttributeFirebaseNeonSupabase
In one lineGoogle's backend for mobile and web apps, with logins, data and hosting in one.A Postgres database that scales to zero when idle, so side projects cost nothing.A ready-made database, logins and file storage for apps you build with AI tools.
Pricing modelFreemiumFreemiumOpen source
Starting pricePay as you goPay as you goFrom $25/mo
Free plan Yes Yes Yes
Works with Claude Code Yes Yes Yes

Rating breakdown

Our scores out of 5. The higher bar in each row is highlighted.

AttributeFirebaseNeonSupabase
Overall rating4.14.04.3Winner
Ease of useHow quickly someone non-technical gets value from it.
3.5
3.5
4.0
FeaturesHow much it can do, and how well the pieces fit together.
4.5
3.5
4.5
Output qualityHow good the results are before you fix them.
4.0
4.5
4.5
Value for moneyWhat you get for the price, including the free plan.
4.0
4.5
4.5
Speed & reliabilityHow fast it is and how often it falls over.
4.5
4.0
4.0

Feature comparison

A tick means it does this today. A dash means we haven't checked.

AttributeFirebaseNeonSupabase
Access & platform
Free plan Yes Yes Yes
Mobile app No No No
Desktop app No No No
Browser extension No No No
API access Yes Yes Yes
Teams & business
Team workspace Yes Yes Yes
Enterprise plan or SSO Yes Yes Yes
Connects to other apps Yes Yes Yes
Open source or self-hosted No Yes Yes
AI abilities
Works with your files Yes No Yes
Understands images Yes No No
Makes images Yes No No
Makes video No No No
Writes code Yes Yes Yes
Runs agents or automations Yes No Yes
Learns your brand or style No No No
Works in many languages–––
Capabilities score10/ 177/ 179/ 17

Pricing

Plans as listed on each vendor's site when we last checked. Confirm before you buy.

AttributeFirebaseNeonSupabase
Plans

SparkOur pick

Free

Early projects and apps with a small audience.

FreeOur pick

Free

Side projects and learning.

Free

Free

Prototypes, side projects and seeing if it suits you.

Blaze

Pay as you go, no monthly fee

Anything that might grow past the free quotas.

Launch

Pay as you go, no monthly minimum

Small production apps.

ProOur pick

From $25/mo

Anything real people will use.

Scale

Pay as you go, higher rates

Teams needing an SLA and bigger databases.

Team

From $599/mo

Companies that need SSO and compliance paperwork.

Enterprise

Custom

Large products with uptime guarantees.

Which plan to pickSpark is enough until real users arrive. Move to Blaze when you need Cloud Functions or you're close to a quota, and set a budget alert the moment you do. There's no middle tier, so your bill goes straight from nothing to usage based.Free covers more than you'd expect, including several small live apps. Move to Launch when a project needs more than 100 compute hours a month or a longer restore window. Scale is for teams that need an SLA, not for individuals.Build on Free. Switch to Pro the day you share the app with anyone outside your team, mostly so the project stops pausing. Team is a big jump that only makes sense once a client or auditor asks for SSO or a SOC 2 report.

Key features

AttributeFirebaseNeonSupabase
Standout features
  • Firestore
  • Authentication
  • Hosting
  • Cloud Functions
  • Messaging and analytics
  • Firebase MCP server
  • Serverless Postgres
  • Branching
  • Point-in-time restore
  • Official MCP server
  • Neon Auth
  • Postgres database
  • Auth
  • Storage
  • Edge Functions
  • Realtime
  • Official MCP server

Pros and cons

AttributeFirebaseNeonSupabase
Pros
  • Battle-tested at huge scale for over a decade
  • The best mobile tooling in this category
  • Live sync and offline support built in
  • Generous free plan with no card required
  • Push notifications, analytics and hosting in one place
  • Real Postgres, no lock-in
  • Free plan allows 100 projects
  • Branching is genuinely useful, not a gimmick
  • No monthly minimum on paid plans
  • First-class Vercel integration
  • Standard Postgres underneath, so you can leave any time
  • Logins, storage, functions and live updates in one dashboard
  • The widest support across AI app builders and Claude Code
  • Generous free plan for trying things out
  • Open source, with self-hosting if you ever need it
Cons
  • Document storage makes reporting and complex queries awkward
  • Usage-based costs can spike with traffic
  • Hard to move off, since nothing else speaks Firestore
  • Google has retired products before, most recently Firebase Studio
  • Only the database; no storage, functions or mature auth
  • Cold starts add a delay after a project has been idle
  • Usage billing takes some learning to predict
  • Now owned by Databricks, so the direction could shift
  • Free projects pause after a week of inactivity
  • Usage charges on Pro can be hard to predict as traffic grows
  • Access rules and SQL still take some learning for non-technical people
  • The jump from Pro to Team is steep

Who each one is for

AttributeFirebaseNeonSupabase
Best for
  • Mobile app backends
  • Live-updating data and chat
  • Sign in with Google or Apple
  • Push notifications
  • Postgres for side projects
  • Safe database experiments with branching
  • Apps hosted on Vercel
  • Usage-based pricing
  • Backend for AI-built apps
  • User logins and permissions
  • File and image storage
  • Apps that need a real database
You'll find it used by
  • Mobile developers
  • Startups
  • Google shops
  • Hobbyists
  • Developers
  • Vercel users
  • Startups
  • Claude Code users
  • Indie builders
  • Startups
  • Developers
  • Agencies

How we compare

Ratings are our own, from using each tool, across ease of use, features, output quality, value for money, speed & reliability. The "Visit" buttons may use affiliate links, which never affect a score.

Swap in another tool

More databases & backend tools from the library.