Skip to content

Side-by-side comparison · Image, Logo & Design

Figma vs Nano Banana vs ChatGPT Images

Everything that matters when choosing between them, in one place: our rating, what each can do, what they cost, and the trade-offs.

Figma

4.1

From $16/mo per full seat

Best overall

Nano Banana

4.6

From $19.99/mo

ChatGPT Images

4.2

Free to start

Comparing 3 tools, the maximum.

At a glance

Figma

4.1

Pick it if: Founders and teams designing a website, app or product, or working closely with developers.

Nano Banana

4.6
Best overallBest value

Pick it if: Marketers, store owners and creators who need realistic images and edits that stay true to the original person or product.

ChatGPT Images

4.2
Easiest to use

Pick it if: Anyone who already uses ChatGPT and wants quick, accurate images without learning another tool.

Overview

AttributeFigmaNano BananaChatGPT Images
In one lineThe design tool product teams use, now able to turn a prompt into a working prototype.Google's image model. Describe an edit and it keeps faces and products looking the same.Make and edit images inside ChatGPT by describing what you want, words included.
Pricing modelFreemiumFreemiumFreemium
Starting price$16/mo per full seat$19.99/moFree
Free plan Yes Yes Yes
Works with Claude Code Yes Yes No

Rating breakdown

Our scores out of 5. The higher bar in each row is highlighted.

AttributeFigmaNano BananaChatGPT Images
Overall rating4.14.6Winner4.2
Ease of useHow quickly someone non-technical gets value from it.
3.0
4.5
5.0
FeaturesHow much it can do, and how well the pieces fit together.
5.0
4.5
4.0
Output qualityHow good the results are before you fix them.
4.5
5.0
4.5
Value for moneyWhat you get for the price, including the free plan.
4.0
4.5
4.0
Speed & reliabilityHow fast it is and how often it falls over.
4.0
4.5
3.5

Feature comparison

A tick means it does this today. A dash means we haven't checked.

AttributeFigmaNano BananaChatGPT Images
Access & platform
Free plan Yes Yes Yes
Mobile app Yes Yes Yes
Desktop app Yes No Yes
Browser extension No No Yes
API access Yes Yes Yes
Teams & business
Team workspace Yes No Yes
Enterprise plan or SSO Yes Yes Yes
Connects to other apps Yes Yes Yes
Open source or self-hosted No No No
AI abilities
Works with your files Yes Yes Yes
Understands images Yes Yes Yes
Makes images Yes Yes Yes
Makes video No No Yes
Writes code Yes No Yes
Runs agents or automations No No Yes
Learns your brand or style Yes No Yes
Works in many languages Yes Yes Yes
Capabilities score13/ 179/ 1716/ 17

Pricing

Plans as listed on each vendor's site when we last checked. Confirm before you buy.

AttributeFigmaNano BananaChatGPT Images
Plans

Starter

Free

One person learning or sketching a first product.

Free (Gemini app and AI Studio)

Free

Trying it and occasional images.

Free

Free

A few images a day.

ProfessionalOur pick

$16/mo per full seat

Small teams designing a real product.

Google AI ProOur pick

$19.99/mo

Marketers and creators making images every week.

Go

See website

Light users who hit the free limits.

Organization

$55/mo per full seat, billed yearly

Companies with several teams.

Google AI Ultra

From $99.99/mo

Heavy daily image and video makers.

PlusOur pick

See website

Most marketers and business owners.

Enterprise

$90/mo per full seat, billed yearly

Large organisations with security and governance needs.

Gemini API

From $0.034 per image

Developers and automated workflows.

Pro

See website

Heavy daily users.

Business

See website

Teams who need shared workspaces and admin.

Which plan to pickStart on Starter if it is just you. Move to Professional when you have a developer or second designer involved, and put them on a cheaper dev or collab seat rather than a full seat. Organization and Enterprise are for companies, not small businesses.Start free in the Gemini app to see if it suits your work. If you make images most weeks, Google AI Pro is the one to buy because it unlocks Nano Banana Pro and comes with Gemini, video credits and storage. Developers should use Nano Banana 2 on the API and save Pro for hero images.Free is enough to find out if the quality suits you. Plus is the one to buy if you make images most days, because the limits stop getting in the way and you get the whole assistant too. Pro is only for people living in ChatGPT all day.

Key features

AttributeFigmaNano BananaChatGPT Images
Standout features
  • Real-time collaboration
  • Figma Make
  • Dev Mode
  • Claude Code connection
  • Design systems
  • FigJam and Slides
  • Edit by describing
  • Consistent characters
  • Blend reference images
  • Sharp text and 4K
  • Grounded in Google Search
  • Gemini API
  • Edit by conversation
  • Accurate text
  • Reference images
  • Thinking mode
  • Lives inside ChatGPT
  • API as gpt-image-2

Pros and cons

AttributeFigmaNano BananaChatGPT Images
Pros
  • The industry standard, so designers and developers already know it
  • Collaboration is as easy as a Google Doc
  • Figma Make turns a brief into a testable prototype quickly
  • Official Claude Code connection for design-to-code
  • Starter plan is generous for a solo person
  • The best at editing a photo while keeping the person or product identical
  • Free to try in the Gemini app
  • Pro renders accurate text and up to 4K
  • Cheap, fast API with a half-price batch mode
  • Built into Canva, Photoshop and Higgsfield as well as Google's apps
  • No learning curve: describe it, then describe the fix
  • Reliable text and faithful use of your logo and product photos
  • Included in every ChatGPT plan, including Free
  • Handles many languages well
  • Thinking mode makes complex layouts and infographics workable
Cons
  • Steep learning curve for anyone who is not a designer
  • Seat types and per-seat pricing are confusing for small teams
  • AI features and the Claude connection are tightly limited on the free plan
  • Overkill for social posts and flyers
  • Less artistic flair than Midjourney
  • Free images carry a visible watermark, and every image has an invisible SynthID mark
  • Model names and plan limits change often
  • Safety filters can block harmless requests involving people
  • Slower than dedicated generators
  • Free plan limits run out quickly on a busy day
  • Less distinctive artistic style than Midjourney
  • Limited fine control over composition compared with a design tool
  • No vector output

Who each one is for

AttributeFigmaNano BananaChatGPT Images
Best for
  • Website and app design
  • Clickable prototypes
  • Handing designs to developers
  • Design systems and brand assets
  • Editing photos by describing the change
  • Product shots and lifestyle scenes
  • Consistent characters across images
  • Posters and graphics with readable text
  • Mockups and signage with real text
  • Editing an image by describing changes
  • Social tiles and quick marketing visuals
  • Multilingual text in images
You'll find it used by
  • Product teams
  • Founders
  • Developers
  • Agencies
  • UX designers
  • Marketers
  • Ecommerce store owners
  • Content creators
  • Designers
  • Developers
  • Small business owners
  • Marketers
  • Product teams
  • Anyone on ChatGPT

How we compare

Ratings are our own, from using each tool, across ease of use, features, output quality, value for money, speed & reliability. The "Visit" buttons may use affiliate links, which never affect a score.

Swap in another tool

More image, logo & design tools from the library.